- Nov 19, 2001
- 30,322
- 4
- 0
Originally posted by: CPA
I'm at a loss for words.
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?
Originally posted by: jumpr
I can't believe the news station used the word "poop." That's despicable. They could have at least substituted it with "defecated."
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?
Kind of my thought also. How was this endangering anyone?
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?