53 year old man poops in diaper...held on child endangerment charges

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Yeh. Like trying to fine this guy $75,000 really does ANYONE any good. Laugh it up, and get on with your life.
 

cjchaps

Diamond Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,013
1
81
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?
 

Actaeon

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2000
8,657
20
76
I wonder if he still had poop in his pants when the police caught him in the super market.
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?

i don't understand what's going on either
 

beatle

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2001
5,661
5
81
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?

Kind of my thought also. How was this endangering anyone?
 

I can't believe the news station used the word "poop." That's despicable. They could have at least substituted it with "defecated."
 

shimsham

Lifer
May 9, 2002
10,765
0
0
hes obviously a mental case, and this is an excuse to get him off the streets. pink stretch pants with a diaper? no sane 55 year old man, or anyone of any age or sex for that matter, would wear that to try and get a job at a school, sh!t themselves, and then go wander around the super market. i would think crazy people could be seen as a danger to anyone, really.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,940
4,529
126
1) Why is this child endangerment? The news must have left something out.
2) By law you must give EVERYONE that asks a job application. It is your right to throw the completed application away, but you must allow people to fill one out. The school is probably looking at a lawsuit.
 

Ikonomi

Diamond Member
Dec 19, 2003
6,056
1
0
Originally posted by: jumpr
I can't believe the news station used the word "poop." That's despicable. They could have at least substituted it with "defecated."

Eh, seems like all the "Bizarre News" stories are written in the same sort of style, and it's all AP anyway.

I noticed the same thing, though. I liked it.
 

Gibson486

Lifer
Aug 9, 2000
18,378
2
0
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?

Kind of my thought also. How was this endangering anyone?

I am confused too. He was wearing a diaper because he was old, so he pooped in it. Isn't that what a diaper is for?
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
Yeah, there's something missing from the story. The guy's a wacko but at least he wore a diaper. Oh wait...I'm not sure what's worse...the guy sh!tting his pants without a diaper or wearing a diaper in anticipation of sh!tting in them.
 

PunDogg

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2002
4,529
1
0
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?

yeah i don't get it either