5000 fake Trump votes in Wisconsin?

[buckshot24]

Lets say Wisconsin flips to Hillary, she would still need Michigan and Pennsylvania to flip. Yeah liberals aren't gullible. These results aren't going to get overturned.

 

[Newbian]

I think so, they hacked the markers used to complete lines on Michigan ballots too.

Invisible ink?

 

[buckshot24]

Invisible ink?

Haha, hacked Russian invisible ink is the best.

 

[nickqt]

Well, it used to be fun poking at the miserable existence of partisan lefties on this forum. Now most of you are just turning downright pathetic. Enjoy your forum.

I get it. You're delusional. You project. You're a modern US conservative.

Thanks for the update, champ.

 

[buckshot24]

I get it. You're delusional. You project. You're a modern US conservative.

Thanks for the update, champ.

And liberals just spent 4 million plus to investigate "Russian hacked voting machine". haha The left is turning into Alex Jones.

 

[JSt0rm]

rr

And liberals just spent 4 million plus to investigate "Russian hacked voting machine". haha The left is turning into Alex Jones.

Well russians influenced the election already. We just want to see how far they went.

 

[leper84]

Given the massive amount of unfounded nonsense the media reported on during the election and how quickly they started right back up with it after, I think speculating before the recount is finished is wasting time.

 

[alan1476]

I get it. You're delusional. You project. You're a modern US conservative.

Thanks for the update, champ.

President Trump will be the best leader the USA has ever seen


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Well russians influenced the election already.

Prove it.

 

[buckshot24]

Well russians influenced the election already. We just want to see how far they went.

Russian invisible ink here in Michigan? How could they have hacked Michigan?

 

[speeder009]

Yeah sure keep believing that. Maybe UFOs or Bigfoot hacked the election results not to mention the thousands of retail workers from target and Walmart bused from the Boston area to Southern New Hampshire to vote multiple times

Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

 

[JSt0rm]

Prove it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html

 

[speeder009]

Yes, laughing at the fever delusions that are shit into your skull means I've fallen off the deep end. And stuff.

Enjoy Strongman Trump reneging on his promises to you, as he loots the US in the exact same manner he has looted the US over the past 50 years of his life.

The economy is very strong now. So far these predictions of doom and civil war after the election haven't happened only a bunch of coddled snowflakes protesting that everyone sees for who they are a bunch of criminal thugs who should have been locked up

Geez. I thought he was a disgusting Pig for a decade and half. Look at that photo!

As an American, I'm ashamed.

So -- Red State Trump voters! If you're visiting California by road trip, I refuse emergency assistance to Red Stater's whom I can identify with trick questions, until they produce a birth certificate. If I find you thirsty in Death Valley, I expectorate a lot for a respiratory condition. I charge a dollar a wad.

Or -- like the maid said in "The Help:" Eat my shit!

Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

 

[JSt0rm]

you guys don't care as long as your side, the russian side, wins.

 

[JSt0rm]

The economy is very strong now. So far these predictions of doom and civil war after the election haven't happened only a bunch of coddled snowflakes protesting that everyone sees for who they are a bunch of criminal thugs who should have been locked up



Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

spidey007 reinvented!

 

[alan1476]

Prove it.

Easy son he hasn't even taken office yet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nickqt]

The economy is very strong now. So far these predictions of doom and civil war after the election haven't happened only a bunch of coddled snowflakes protesting that everyone sees for who they are a bunch of criminal thugs who should have been locked up



Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

Nothing screams freedom like wanting people who you disagree with to be locked up.

Keep on keepin' on, chump.

 

[JSt0rm]

we have officially accused russia of doing ti. Through dipole channels and with the backing of our intel agencies. So you dummies on the internet with your fake news are somehow in a better position to know the truth then the full power of the federal intelligence agencies?

 

[HamburgerBoy]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html

That's proof that they were involved in the hacking of DNC emails. That's not proof that Wikileaks changed enough minds to swing the election.

 

[speeder009]

Nothing screams freedom like wanting people who you disagree with to be locked up.

Keep on keepin' on, chump.

Vandalism and inciting a riot not to mention assault which many of these protesters engaged in are class b-e felonies

Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

 

[buckshot24]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0b9654-8cbf-11e6-875e-2c1bfe943b66_story.html

The same intelligence agency that was sure there were WMDs in Iraq? This isn't proof of anything except the Obama admin accused the Russians of something.

 

[nickqt]

That's proof that they were involved in the hacking of DNC emails. That's not proof that Wikileaks changed enough minds to swing the election.

So Russia hacked the DNC emails to ostensibly have a role in the US elections, and by hacking the DNC, to throw its weight behind one candidate, or at least against one candidate. But, there isn't quantitative proof that MI, Wi, or Pa election results were directly affected by Russia's hacking of DNC emails. Is that a somewhat accurate description of what you think regarding Russia and DNC hacking?

 

[HamburgerBoy]

So Russia hacked the DNC emails to ostensibly have a role in the US elections, and by hacking the DNC, to throw its weight behind one candidate, or at least against one candidate. But, there isn't quantitative proof that MI, Wi, or Pa election results were directly affected by Russia's hacking of DNC emails. Is that a somewhat accurate description of what you think regarding Russia and DNC hacking?

How many voters do you think were swayed to not vote Clinton due to Wikileaks?

 

[buckshot24]

So Russia hacked the DNC emails to ostensibly have a role in the US elections, and by hacking the DNC, to throw its weight behind one candidate, or at least against one candidate. But, there isn't quantitative proof that MI, Wi, or Pa election results were directly affected by Russia's hacking of DNC emails. Is that a somewhat accurate description of what you think regarding Russia and DNC hacking?

I think his position is a bit absurd myself. What we know is that the US accused Russia of doing some hacking, not that the Russian government did some hacking.

 

[nickqt]

How many voters do you think were swayed to not vote Clinton due to Wikileaks?

I have no idea how many voters decided to stay home, vote third party, vote Trump, or vote Clinton, based on wikileaks, and to some extent, it doesn't really matter. The election is over, and even if Wi, or Mi flipped, Trump still wins. Pa is gone, so it's all moot. That said, I think all elections should have a recount - if the original count was legit, it won't really change, and if it wasn't, then at least you know that there are problems that obviously need addressed. I mean, if you really care about election results, counting the votes twice shouldn't upset you.

To answer your question, I don't think that wikileaks threw the election to anyone. Trump voters aren't going to get nervous about supporting Trump just because Russia may prefer him over Clinton. And Clinton voters who are aghast that the Democratic party colluded with Democrats to tip the scale to the Democratic candidate in the Democratic primary were probably going to stay home or vote for Mickey Mouse anyway, all things being equal.

My question was more of a gauging of whether or not you think that Russia had intent to meddle, rather than whether Russia actively changed the election.

My own opinion is that, of course Russia wants to play a role in US elections, just like the US wants to play a role in every election it can.

What I find interesting is how people can rationalize it away, as if it doesn't really matter what Russia did, if their preferred candidate benefited from it. And I use the term "rationalize" very loosely, as can be seen by the comments of many people in this very thread.