500 gb hard drive registers at 465 gb???Help

Nov 28, 2006
80
0
0
Hey guys!!!
I just bought 2 new hard drives:

a western digital 250 gig
a western digital 500gig

Here is the problem..

I installed both of them on my computer
And the 250 registers at 232 gigs???
and the 500 registers at 465 gigs????
Where the hell are the rest of my gigs???
I want what I payed for lol..

So far they have not been formatted with any operating systems...
I'm using them for back up.How do I get my extra gigs back?????
Any advice on what to do????
 

Matthias99

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2003
8,808
0
0
Hard drive "gigabyte" = 100,000,000,000 bytes.

Windows "gigabyte" is actually a "gibibyte" or 2^40 = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes.

If you look at the capacity in bytes of the drive, you'll see it has almost exactly 250,000,000,000/500,000,000,000 bytes.
 
Aug 10, 2001
10,420
2
0
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Hard drive "gigabyte" = 100,000,000,000 bytes.

Windows "gigabyte" is actually a "gibibyte" or 2^40 = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes.

If you look at the capacity in bytes of the drive, you'll see it has almost exactly 250,000,000,000/500,000,000,000 bytes.
I think you meant 2^30.

 

WiseOldDude

Senior member
Feb 13, 2005
702
0
0
I can see it now, in the year 2525, some fool will buy a 10 Gizzillion Terabyte microdrive, and some fool will be posting on a forum, "It only shows 9.45876 Gazzillion Terabytes, they cheated me"
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: WiseOldDude
I can see it now, in the year 2525, some fool will buy a 10 Gizzillion Terabyte microdrive, and some fool will be posting on a forum, "It only shows 9.45876 Gazzillion Terabytes, they cheated me"

It's worse, Maxtor and some others got sued over this from people claiming false advertising.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,890
1,090
126
Originally posted by: WiseOldDude
I can see it now, in the year 2525, some fool will buy a 10 Gizzillion Terabyte microdrive, and some fool will be posting on a forum, "It only shows 9.45876 Gazzillion Terabytes, they cheated me"

I think it really sucks how they advertise gigs, a 500 will always format to 465, it's not like he paid for a 500 gig and got 498. If you expect 500 and get 35 less, that's a lot of gigs. It's not like it differs from system to system, they should either make the drives bigger so it'll be 500 megs after formatting, or list the size as 465, it's not like anyone can use the drive unformatted. :)



 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
It's not about formatting. There's no space lost except in the advertising. 465GB is actually how much are on that drive, regardless of format.
 

JW310

Golden Member
Oct 30, 1999
1,582
0
0
Originally posted by: QueBert
Originally posted by: WiseOldDude
I can see it now, in the year 2525, some fool will buy a 10 Gizzillion Terabyte microdrive, and some fool will be posting on a forum, "It only shows 9.45876 Gazzillion Terabytes, they cheated me"

I think it really sucks how they advertise gigs, a 500 will always format to 465, it's not like he paid for a 500 gig and got 498. If you expect 500 and get 35 less, that's a lot of gigs. It's not like it differs from system to system, they should either make the drives bigger so it'll be 500 megs after formatting, or list the size as 465, it's not like anyone can use the drive unformatted. :)

It's not that formatting the drive causes the "loss" of capacity. It's due to the way the manufacturers label the drives, as the posters above have already stated.

To a manufacturer, one "GB" is 1,000,000,000 bytes. Operating systems see one "GB" as 1,073,741,824 bytes.
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Originally posted by: sm8000
It's not about formatting. There's no space lost except in the advertising. 465GB is actually how much are on that drive, regardless of format.

Well, some of that space is used by the OS for file system structures, and that space DOES come out of the 500gig. But the amount is minimal compared is fairly trivial to the 1000bytes vs 1024bytes issue.
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
I really hate how there are 2 different measurements. They should pick one and have it be universal. I don't care which.
 

WiseOldDude

Senior member
Feb 13, 2005
702
0
0
One thousand to us = 1,000

One thousand to a computer = 1,024

This is not 1960, it is past time that people learn some of the basics about computers.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
This is not 1960, it is past time that people learn some of the basics about computers.

Actually it should be the opposite, as computers progress they should get easier so people have to know less about them in order to use them.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
Originally posted by: bsobel
Originally posted by: WiseOldDude
I can see it now, in the year 2525, some fool will buy a 10 Gizzillion Terabyte microdrive, and some fool will be posting on a forum, "It only shows 9.45876 Gazzillion Terabytes, they cheated me"

It's worse, Maxtor and some others got sued over this from people claiming false advertising.

Just like the monitor manufacturers who were claiming 17" diagonal, when the viewable was 15.9 diagonal. It's a plot, I tell you.
 

Steve

Lifer
May 2, 2004
15,945
11
81
Originally posted by: Nothinman
This is not 1960, it is past time that people learn some of the basics about computers.

Actually it should be the opposite, as computers progress they should get easier so people have to know less about them in order to use them.

Apple has been doing this for years.
 

Matthias99

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2003
8,808
0
0
Originally posted by: WiseOldDude
One thousand to us = 1,000

One thousand to a computer = 1,024

This is not 1960, it is past time that people learn some of the basics about computers.

The "kilo-", "mega-", and "giga-" prefixes (from the metric system) have well-defined meanings -- 1,000, 1,000,000, and 1,000,000,000 respectively. A "megawatt" (random example unit) is 1,000,000 watts, not 1,024,768 watts, and any rational person who understood the metric system but not the innards of computers would expect a "megabyte" to be 1,000,000 bytes and not 1,024,768 bytes.

The 'binary' units (2^10 = 1024, 2^20 = 1024768, 2^30 = 1073741824) are 'kibibytes' or 'binary kilobytes' (KiB), 'mebibytes' or 'binary megabytes' (MeB), and 'gibibytes' or 'binary gigabytes' (GiB) -- but those formal units didn't exist until fairly recently, so most people in early computer science just used the metric terms improperly. Now they're stuck in everyone's heads (and a lot of programs), unfortunately.

Basically -- mathematically, Windows is wrong, but going by computer science 'tradition', the hard drive manufacturers are wrong (or at least misleading). IMO, Windows and other OSes and tools should change to use the right units, or show it both ways.
 

bsobel

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Dec 9, 2001
13,346
0
0
Basically -- mathematically, Windows is wrong, but going by computer science 'tradition', the hard drive manufacturers are wrong (or at least misleading). IMO, Windows and other OSes and tools should change to use the right units, or show it both ways.

I agree it should be shown one way, but I tend to lean more towards the current 'OS' version since we will continue to add power in ^2 moving forward. Everything else (video memory, main memory, etc) is referenced as MeB the HD manufactures should stop playing games and list capacities the same (especially now when the differences are getting so noticeable)

 

Seekermeister

Golden Member
Oct 3, 2006
1,971
0
0
It's not all in the fashion in which gigs are counted, because my Maxtor 80GB HDs have 2 more gigs than my WDC 80GB HD. Actually, Maxtor called 82GB as 80GB.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
It's not all in the fashion in which gigs are counted, because my Maxtor 80GB HDs have 2 more gigs than my WDC 80GB HD. Actually, Maxtor called 82GB as 80GB.

That's almost certainly not related to the 1000vs1024 issue and you probably just got some mislabled drives or something.
 
Nov 28, 2006
80
0
0
Thank you!!!!


All I have been doing for the past month is researching on the internet
and reading maximum pc and cpu magazines.unsatisfied with Dell and my 9150's
limitations....I decided that I was going to build my own computer....which I did all by myself....I returned my 9150(which was a long drawn out fight...but I won)and I used the money to buy parts for my new set up.......A new path of illumination has opened up and GOldlight was born!!!!!Lol

So I found anandtech.com and it was like a mouse in a room full of cheese...a gold mine!!!!

I have read about over clocking but I want to do it right=====anandtech!!!!!

I have used many security suites and adware,anti virus',and etc in the past but which ones use less memory,resources,and etc....oh let me look on =====anandtech!!!!!

I want to learn how to dual boot 2 operating systems on a hard drive======anandtech didnt help me with this one but I researched and found out any way...lol

Why does my 500 gig hard drive register at 465 gb instead of 500=======let me check on anandtech!!!!!!(I didnt know that I was going to be called dumb for this one...it was a honest noobie mistake lol)

So as you can see.....anandtech has become my new obsession.......
a weeks worth full of research can be shortened to a day.....well it depends on the answers that you get.......some answers are good and to the point.....
some people insult you for even asking a question(lol)......and some people have become so technical that their answers are not even human anymore..lol.Good or bad...I love it!!!!!!

Has anandtech spoiled me....yes!!
should I stop researching on my own???No, but there is always anandtech!!!lol
Do I feel bitter about giving Dell thousands of dollars over the years...yes!!!I'm
never going back..

So there you have it......
And remember before everyone of you became a platinum,diamond,elite member,and etc..
You were all newbies just like me!!!!!!!Lol

Happy New Year!!!!!Now I'm going to check out "Hot deals"..lol