50 Proprietary applications and their Open Source alternatives

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,417
4,186
75
Adobe Premiere to Avidemux
Ha. Ha! AHAHAHAHAHA! That's like going from a Buick to a bicycle - a bicycle with a bent wheel no less! The closest Windows equivalent to Avidemux is VirtualDub - except that Avidemux crashes more.

Skype to Wengophone
Why? I'm using Skype on Linux right now.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Ha. Ha! AHAHAHAHAHA! That's like going from a Buick to a bicycle - a bicycle with a bent wheel no less! The closest Windows equivalent to Avidemux is VirtualDub - except that Avidemux crashes more.

Don't shoot the messenger. :p

Why? I'm using Skype on Linux right now.

The list is for open source alternatives, not necessarily those that run on Linux. You can have proprietary code on an open source OS, its done all the time. Skype on Linux is proprietary code.
 

johnny.dacu

Member
Jul 6, 2010
54
0
0
Thx for the link... I did not know there is a Flash alternative.. Now i do:D... I've just start download OpenLaszlo to see what can it do
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Warning: Visiting this site may harm your computer!
The website at whdb.com contains elements from the site one.irvine-houses.net, which appears to host malware – software that can hurt your computer or otherwise operate without your consent. Just visiting a site that contains malware can infect your computer.
For detailed information about the problems with these elements, visit the Google Safe Browsing diagnostic page for one.irvine-houses.net.
Learn more about how to protect yourself from harmful software online.

I wonder if they hosted their website with CentOS or Windows Server....
 

PowerEngineer

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2001
3,570
738
136
Norton also warned me that it blocked an 'attack' when I followed the link to that site.
 

dguy6789

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2002
8,558
3
76
Pretty much all of that article reads like it was written by some 16 year old Linux fanboy who thinks it is cool to bash Microsoft. Many of those open source alternatives listed are an order of magnitude less functional than the proprietary ones they are compared to.
 

zerogear

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2000
5,611
9
81
Pretty much all of that article reads like it was written by some 16 year old Linux fanboy who thinks it is cool to bash Microsoft. Many of those open source alternatives listed are an order of magnitude less functional than the proprietary ones they are compared to.

Agreed. And also, this is partly why people who have CS degrees are getting paid less and less.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
2008 people...this article is from 2008!

So? Millions of Windows users are still using an OS from 2001...

Agreed.
People that purchased a computer do not often upgrade their OS.

Those that had XP were deluged with horror stories about Vista and then found out that their H/W would not support W7. So why upgrade?

Many will not upgrade to a newer OS unless there is a must have app and/or new hardware that will not work under the existing OS.

OVer the last eight years, ALL clients that I have had, use XP as there corporate OS.

People will stick with what they are familiar with and what works. Open Source may be great for those that want to experiment around; but if it can not do what one is expecting, the experienced/professional or novice user will have no qualms about going back to the familiar warmth of the commerical package that they are used to.