CakeMonster
Golden Member
- Nov 22, 2012
- 1,548
- 712
- 136
Now that 50 series looks to be on 4N which is not cutting edge, alternative processes can be viable performance wise. But ironically, 4N is probably not that expensive either compared to 3N which most people would have guessed would be used 1-2 years ago, so why multi source? I suspect they won't until there's heavy incentives. NV went for maximizing profit, 40 series seems to have been the exception, 30 series was on a cheap node, and 50 series is on semi cheap one.I'm surprised that Nvidia aren't looking at putting lower end parts on an Intel process. They used Samsung 14nm for the 1050 cards back in the day, they could put the 5050/5060 on Intel. Frees up more of their TSMC capacity for top end GPUs and AI parts, gives them more leverage next time they negotiate with TSMC, and helps cultivate a plan B in case they can't get TSMC capacity for whatever reason.