5,000% Price Increase For Daraprim

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
I 100% agree. I don't see other developed countries having this problem; I wonder how they handle drug approval?


The trade barriers we have for drug imports is an interesting thing. That these barriers were pushed forward by the very same folks promoting "free trade" in most other areas is quite interesting. This is true even when the drugs we wish to import are drugs made by US pharmaceuticals.

Me thinks the real reason behind this is the power the drug companies have in DC and the desire many on the right have to completely blow up the health care system.


Brian
 

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,757
619
121
Because no Republican candidate has ever and I mean EVER capitalized on an issue like this before.

This is not a partisan politics issue, this is a basic human morality issue. When does the amount of money made vs how many human lives are saved become important?

I'm curious since you are such a hard core conservative. Can give me one example of a major liberal legislation item that has been passed over the course of the last 100 years that you feel is acceptable? I promise you won't instantly burst into flames if you do, nor Jesus himself won't come off the cross and send you to hell for all eternity.


Look, it's not partisan and I did not say it was. It's just now all of a sudden Hillary is grabbing at what ever she can. Last time it was old photos of her self. She knows as well as her supports that she is in deep shit. Quite frankly I'm surprised she isn't in jail already. If this was a Republican I bet my bottom dollar their ass would already be in jail.

But, "what difference at this point does it make?"
 

Ham n' Eggs

Member
Sep 22, 2015
181
0
0
Hi, 1st post here.

I think some are making a mistake in this thread, and with this story in general.
This guy is not a pharmaceutical company by any real measure. His company is basically just an entity with a lot of money that chose to purchase rights to a drug and then crank the price into absurdity. It is legal and completely immoral a-hole profiteering but what can you do?

I would be very surprised if anyone who actually works for a pharmaceutical company that actually has R&D and develops and takes drug candidates to market believes a word of what this jerkoff is claiming about developing new treatments for anything. This guys is just covering his bad PR with some fluff to try and deflect the bad press.

The real travesty here is that people see what this a-hole is doing and think "see, I knew pharmaceutical companies are evil"... or something along those lines. This guy's lame maneuvers have nothing to do with what goes on at the big pharma companies that have serious R&D departments and that spend immense sums trying to take new drug candidates to the market. I read early on in this thread that it can cost a hundreds of millions to take a drug to market. Honestly that can be way off depending on what diseases/organs you are trying to treat.

New drugs for some very common life threatening neurological disorders (for example) can cost billions of dollars to try to take to market. This is just the costs that happen after the drug has been fully developed (i.e. not including R&D). Imagine what happens to a large company when multiple such trials fail to pass phase III. It is devastatingly expensive and extremely risky. Billions down the tube.
How do real pharma companies offset those extreme costs? Trials fail all-the-time. The costs are real and people just don't seem to have a clue how the industry functions.

It's really too bad and this douche nozzle with his 5000% increase antics is unfortunately covering the whole industry in bad PR.

----
tldr; don't conflate this guy's company with big pharma companies that actually develop the medicines that save & improve lives. the costs of bring a drug to market are phenomenal and when trials fail we don't want truly phenomenal pharmaceutical companies to disappear... thus prices can't be dirt cheap.
 

McLovin

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2007
1,915
58
91
Look, it's not partisan and I did not say it was. It's just now all of a sudden Hillary is grabbing at what ever she can. Last time it was old photos of her self. She knows as well as her supports that she is in deep shit. Quite frankly I'm surprised she isn't in jail already. If this was a Republican I bet my bottom dollar their ass would already be in jail.

But, "what difference at this point does it make?"

You eluded to that fact by bringing Hilary into the discussion. Bernie Sanders also made mention of a plan but you did not discuss him, so to me you are just trying to push your agenda.

Wrong. There are alternatives. It's just this idiot bought the patent that is 60 years old and wants to recoup his investment. But this is pretty much a gross misuse of Capitalism.

There are common sense ways to go about things.


You leave out just one sentence and by god you have something, and I can't believe I will say this, you and I can both agree on! :thumbsup:


I still would like to hear an answer to my question. :colbert:
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,249
55,799
136
Hi, 1st post here.

I think some are making a mistake in this thread, and with this story in general.
This guy is not a pharmaceutical company by any real measure. His company is basically just an entity with a lot of money that chose to purchase rights to a drug and then crank the price into absurdity. It is legal and completely immoral a-hole profiteering but what can you do?

I would be very surprised if anyone who actually works for a pharmaceutical company that actually has R&D and develops and takes drug candidates to market believes a word of what this jerkoff is claiming about developing new treatments for anything. This guys is just covering his bad PR with some fluff to try and deflect the bad press.

The real travesty here is that people see what this a-hole is doing and think "see, I knew pharmaceutical companies are evil"... or something along those lines. This guy's lame maneuvers have nothing to do with what goes on at the big pharma companies that have serious R&D departments and that spend immense sums trying to take new drug candidates to the market. I read early on in this thread that it can cost a hundreds of millions to take a drug to market. Honestly that can be way off depending on what diseases/organs you are trying to treat.

New drugs for some very common life threatening neurological disorders (for example) can cost billions of dollars to try to take to market. This is just the costs that happen after the drug has been fully developed (i.e. not including R&D). Imagine what happens to a large company when multiple such trials fail to pass phase III. It is devastatingly expensive and extremely risky. Billions down the tube.
How do real pharma companies offset those extreme costs? Trials fail all-the-time. The costs are real and people just don't seem to have a clue how the industry functions.

It's really too bad and this douche nozzle with his 5000% increase antics is unfortunately covering the whole industry in bad PR.

----
tldr; don't conflate this guy's company with big pharma companies that actually develop the medicines that save & improve lives. the costs of bring a drug to market are phenomenal and when trials fail we don't want truly phenomenal pharmaceutical companies to disappear... thus prices can't be dirt cheap.

I like to think (hope?) that people aren't so much angry at high drug prices intrinsically, they are against people like this asshole who are essentially parasites, and legislation that prohibits Medicare from bargaining for lower prices.

I think people underestimate the costs of drug development as you mention, but I think the Medicare prohibition is just a subsidy to the pharma industry.

Thanks for a pretty obviously informed and level headed post though! Good stuff.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
Apparently it's a new trend. Hedge funds are buying up medicines with expired patents and then jacking up the price to make a quick buck.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/tb-drug-price-cycloserine-1.3237868

Obviously drug companies aren't charities and aren't going to give the product away. But there's no way you can justify an overnight price increase of that amount without it being gouging. That level of greed would make even Gordon Gekko say "whoa, easy there".

I wonder if there's any way to criminally prosecute this, as the drugs are considered a necessary item.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
This guy is an asshole. No question.

But let's think down this road a little further rather than just THROW HIM IN JAIL!!!!11111ONEONEONE

We have a single source for this medication that is apparently absolutely necessary.

What if it wasn't this hedge fund guy jacking up prices on it, what if another company had purchased this company and just shut down that production line because it wasn't profitable?

What if this sole producer just went out of business?

What if the one plant where this was made was destroyed in a natural disaster?

There are any number of scenarios where having a single provider is bad. Throwing this guy in prison fixes none of them.

Everyone should try thinking with more than the reptilian revenge center of their brains.
 

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
I also think there is a good chance that this hedge fund guy is shorting big pharma on the side and is trolling the government to get it clamp down on the widespread gouging that's propping up pharma profits.


And, as a followup, there's a report in CNN Money about this guys past and the idea of shorting big pharma isn't a new one for him...

"He made a name for himself on Wall Street for shorting biotech stocks -- betting that shares would fall after the companies' drugs wouldn't work -- and being very vocal about companies he didn't like on social media."

So, your idea that he's looking to profit from bad PR is not beyond possible.


Brian
 

Brian Stirling

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2010
3,964
2
0
Hi, 1st post here.

I think some are making a mistake in this thread, and with this story in general.
This guy is not a pharmaceutical company by any real measure. His company is basically just an entity with a lot of money that chose to purchase rights to a drug and then crank the price into absurdity. It is legal and completely immoral a-hole profiteering but what can you do?

I would be very surprised if anyone who actually works for a pharmaceutical company that actually has R&D and develops and takes drug candidates to market believes a word of what this jerkoff is claiming about developing new treatments for anything. This guys is just covering his bad PR with some fluff to try and deflect the bad press.

The real travesty here is that people see what this a-hole is doing and think "see, I knew pharmaceutical companies are evil"... or something along those lines. This guy's lame maneuvers have nothing to do with what goes on at the big pharma companies that have serious R&D departments and that spend immense sums trying to take new drug candidates to the market. I read early on in this thread that it can cost a hundreds of millions to take a drug to market. Honestly that can be way off depending on what diseases/organs you are trying to treat.

New drugs for some very common life threatening neurological disorders (for example) can cost billions of dollars to try to take to market. This is just the costs that happen after the drug has been fully developed (i.e. not including R&D). Imagine what happens to a large company when multiple such trials fail to pass phase III. It is devastatingly expensive and extremely risky. Billions down the tube.
How do real pharma companies offset those extreme costs? Trials fail all-the-time. The costs are real and people just don't seem to have a clue how the industry functions.

It's really too bad and this douche nozzle with his 5000% increase antics is unfortunately covering the whole industry in bad PR.

----
tldr; don't conflate this guy's company with big pharma companies that actually develop the medicines that save & improve lives. the costs of bring a drug to market are phenomenal and when trials fail we don't want truly phenomenal pharmaceutical companies to disappear... thus prices can't be dirt cheap.


I'll just have to counter the love Esky has thrown your way. It may well cost hundreds of millions or even billions to develop a drug but how many years do they profit from that? There are all too many drugs that cost more than $100K/year and some that cost that much for a shorter interval. I think this schmuck is just doing what he sees the rest of the industry doing but doing it more blatantly.

Big pharma has lobbied, successfully, to prevent generics and even the same drugs made by the same company from being imported into the country in order to prop up insanely high prices.

And, as you're new here and have appeared to support the drug companies I have to directly ask you -- do you work for any drug companies in any capacity or are you associated with any of the trade groups that support and/or lobby for them?


Brian
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
So allow more than one manufacturer to make this drug. I'm sure many will jump into the market at well below this guys 5000% increase in price. Granting more power to central planners to regulate price is fucking stupid. They already fucked this one up to setup a situation like this. Why give them more opportunity to fuck it up more?

Fast track allowing more manufacturers. Watch as this guy crumbles under the weight of competition.
I think at this point, a bit stronger response is required to nip this in the bud. First, fix the damned FDA. NO drug should be limited to only one manufacturer, even under patent, if only because that company may well decide to not manufacture it in favor of a more profitable drug or, well, do what this guy did. And because one factory can always be taken out by terrorists. Homeland Security requires that we strip your monopoly. And while we're at it - random body cavity searches! For their own protection, natch.

Second, I'd like to see a multi-step federal response. First, give immediate federal grants to three different American companies to cover their cost of set-up to manufacture this drug. If it's useful for malaria, we can always buy it up and donate it to South and Central American nations, Asian nations, African nations, etc. after the bottom falls out.

Second, let's make sure this company is meeting all its societal obligations. Let's start with the workers and send a hundred OSHA inspectors to inspect literally every square inch of their facilities as well as every procedure. Damn it, we've got to protect these workers! Next, let's send in a hundred IRS auditors to make absolutely sure that this company is correctly reporting every transaction and is in compliance with every single applicable law, ordinance, and regulation. Third, let's send in a hundred FDA inspectors to inspect every single process. Gotta make sure such an expensive drug is manufactured with only the utmost in sanitary equipment, procedures, and practices. Fourth, let's send in a hundred custom agents to audit their exports and imports. Gotta make sure these are in line with the laws - ALL the laws. Now, each of these groups will need to interview every employee - and every recent ex-employee - as part of their investigation, but that's a small burden to pay for the manufacturer of such a profitable drug. Heck, I figure we could have the whole thing wrapped up in three months. Maybe six. Definitely under a year. Ish.

Third, let's make sure the CXOs are meeting all their societal obligations. For each, I think perhaps a dozen IRS auditors each should do the trick. Maybe a score - purely for the CXOs' benefit of course. I'm sure they have quite complicated tax filings; we need to help them make sure they are 100% in compliance, as far back as the law allows. For instance, are they actually including every possible taxable benefit they receive? Every time they travel, are they traveling with family members or other non-coworkers? If so, let's make sure they are paying taxes on the proper cash value of those benefits and that portion of the time spent on non-work. Are they paying state taxes for that portion of the year each spends in states with state income taxes? Did the company provide a limo or a cab? Taxable benefit. Airline tickets? Taxable benefit. Resort hotel? Sounds like a paid vacation. Charitable donations? Hmm, probably better check out that charity, just to make sure the donation actually happened and was properly valued. Penalties will of course accrue if discrepancies are found, but the execs are free to retain lawyers and plead their case.

If they're going to fuck the public, then let's all play. Hard.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
This guy is an asshole. No question.

But let's think down this road a little further rather than just THROW HIM IN JAIL!!!!11111ONEONEONE

We have a single source for this medication that is apparently absolutely necessary.

What if it wasn't this hedge fund guy jacking up prices on it, what if another company had purchased this company and just shut down that production line because it wasn't profitable?

What if this sole producer just went out of business?

What if the one plant where this was made was destroyed in a natural disaster?

There are any number of scenarios where having a single provider is bad. Throwing this guy in prison fixes none of them.

Everyone should try thinking with more than the reptilian revenge center of their brains.

I don't care if he is in jail or not, but the government should regulate prices so the company is profitable, but not gouging people. That's what the government already does with utilities.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Hi, 1st post here.

I think some are making a mistake in this thread, and with this story in general.
This guy is not a pharmaceutical company by any real measure. His company is basically just an entity with a lot of money that chose to purchase rights to a drug and then crank the price into absurdity. It is legal and completely immoral a-hole profiteering but what can you do?

I would be very surprised if anyone who actually works for a pharmaceutical company that actually has R&D and develops and takes drug candidates to market believes a word of what this jerkoff is claiming about developing new treatments for anything. This guys is just covering his bad PR with some fluff to try and deflect the bad press.

The real travesty here is that people see what this a-hole is doing and think "see, I knew pharmaceutical companies are evil"... or something along those lines. This guy's lame maneuvers have nothing to do with what goes on at the big pharma companies that have serious R&D departments and that spend immense sums trying to take new drug candidates to the market. I read early on in this thread that it can cost a hundreds of millions to take a drug to market. Honestly that can be way off depending on what diseases/organs you are trying to treat.

New drugs for some very common life threatening neurological disorders (for example) can cost billions of dollars to try to take to market. This is just the costs that happen after the drug has been fully developed (i.e. not including R&D). Imagine what happens to a large company when multiple such trials fail to pass phase III. It is devastatingly expensive and extremely risky. Billions down the tube.
How do real pharma companies offset those extreme costs? Trials fail all-the-time. The costs are real and people just don't seem to have a clue how the industry functions.

It's really too bad and this douche nozzle with his 5000% increase antics is unfortunately covering the whole industry in bad PR.

----
tldr; don't conflate this guy's company with big pharma companies that actually develop the medicines that save & improve lives. the costs of bring a drug to market are phenomenal and when trials fail we don't want truly phenomenal pharmaceutical companies to disappear... thus prices can't be dirt cheap.
I'm not conflating this guy with other pharma companies. On the contrary, I want government to focus like a fucking laser on this douchebag and people like him, to the point that he considers a rectal exam from Roto-Rooter to be the good old days.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,759
16,108
146
This guy is an asshole. No question.

But let's think down this road a little further rather than just THROW HIM IN JAIL!!!!11111ONEONEONE

We have a single source for this medication that is apparently absolutely necessary.

What if it wasn't this hedge fund guy jacking up prices on it, what if another company had purchased this company and just shut down that production line because it wasn't profitable?

What if this sole producer just went out of business?

What if the one plant where this was made was destroyed in a natural disaster?

There are any number of scenarios where having a single provider is bad. Throwing this guy in prison fixes none of them.

Everyone should try thinking with more than the reptilian revenge center of their brains.


While I get where you are coming from, this isn't an unforeseen consequence of being a drug developer the whole point is to buy up patents and make profit by inefficiently allocating resources by market manipulation.

It's similar to what Goldman Sachs was doing in the Aluminum commodities market.

Quite frankly after reading this article, (big grain of salt it's from Gawker), fuck this guy.

http://gawker.com/lawsuit-scumbag-pharma-price-gouger-stalked-and-harass-1732357240
Lawsuit: Scumbag Pill Price Gouger Stalked and Harassed Ex-Coworker's Entire Family

Even before he earned national infamy for jacking up the price of life-saving cancer and HIV meds and then being a general shit about it on Twitter, Turing Pharmaceuticals CEO Martin Shkreli was working hard on a toxic reputation. Court documents show Shkreli’s disturbing history of tormenting the wife and daughters of a business foe.

1442005327162421284.png
1442005327208790052.png


Timothy Pierotti was a colleague of Shkreli at his pervious biotech venture, Retrophin, before an alleged business deal gone awry created bad blood. From there, legal documents allege, Shkreli proceeded to harass and threaten Pierotti’s family via email, Facebook, LinkedIn, and text message. Pierotti says Shkreli—a one time Forbes “30 Under 30” honoree—even broke into various online accounts owned by his family:
 
Last edited:

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
This guy is an asshole. No question.

But let's think down this road a little further rather than just THROW HIM IN JAIL!!!!11111ONEONEONE

We have a single source for this medication that is apparently absolutely necessary.

What if it wasn't this hedge fund guy jacking up prices on it, what if another company had purchased this company and just shut down that production line because it wasn't profitable?

What if this sole producer just went out of business?

What if the one plant where this was made was destroyed in a natural disaster?

There are any number of scenarios where having a single provider is bad. Throwing this guy in prison fixes none of them.

Everyone should try thinking with more than the reptilian revenge center of their brains.
Well said. I don't want to throw him in jail - I just want him to discover that his modus operandi has suddenly become very, very unprofitable, so that on Wall Street he is a legendary example of what not to do if you want to remain rich.
 

Ham n' Eggs

Member
Sep 22, 2015
181
0
0
And, as you're new here and have appeared to support the drug companies I have to directly ask you -- do you work for any drug companies in any capacity or are you associated with any of the trade groups that support and/or lobby for them?
No.

As to the details of exorbitantly expensive drugs, which ones, what they cost etc. I don't claim to be an expert. What I do know is that the resources required to employ the expertise to R&D new drugs, and the costs to take candidates through phase I, II, III can be and often are stupendous. I know of one company which took a 3 billion dollar hit on failed trials within a 12 month period. That company and companies like it need to generate enough revenue to not only pay the full bill for past successes, but also for the inevitable future failures that can cost hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.

We would all be in a sad state if every time a major drug trial failed in phase III that pharma company that was developing the drug teetered on the brink of destruction. They need big profits. On the other hand I would not be surprised if the pricing of some drugs are excessive.

I don't think it's a simple problem.
 
Last edited:

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,868
6,397
126
Dude sees that the drug he acquired saved peoples lives for merely $1000. He sees other drugs that saves peoples lives cost $100k+, so clearly the logical conclusion is that his drug is Underpriced! Right?

Reminds me of the Minimum Wage discussions where people doing Task X don't deserve $15/hr(or whatever Min Wage is proposed)...due to some arbitrarily chosen standard pulled from someone's ass and conveniently ignores any other potential factor that might be important in the determination of a Wage.

This CEO is a psychopath that should be mopping the floors, not at the levers of power.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
Not really. Medical research should be done at the Annapolis Army Medical research city, offering lifetime support for all inhabitants based on qualifying exams. There, the citizens of the city would be supported by government military pay scale in return for lifetime service to the nation performing research into treating and curing diseases. Drugs could be sold at cost plus a small fee, manufactured in the US and sold world wide. A small fee could be used to cover hardship costs. For profit healing is a disease that needs to be cured. Money is of no importance to people who have the basics and are financially secure into the future. This system would attract people dedicated to healing.

hahahhahahahahahahahahahahah funniest thing I have read all month


Why are you laughing? There are plenty of scientists that would devote their lives to research and development who aren't looking to become billionaires, just take care of their basic needs, a pension and funding for their research and they would work harder than just for profit individuals.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Dude sees that the drug he acquired saved peoples lives for merely $1000. He sees other drugs that saves peoples lives cost $100k+, so clearly the logical conclusion is that his drug is Underpriced! Right?

Reminds me of the Minimum Wage discussions where people doing Task X don't deserve $15/hr(or whatever Min Wage is proposed)...due to some arbitrarily chosen standard pulled from someone's ass and conveniently ignores any other potential factor that might be important in the determination of a Wage.

This CEO is a psychopath that should be mopping the floors, not at the levers of power.

If you're the only person in the country who can do a particular job, then you're worth a lot of money.

If you're one of 300M people in the US who can empty a bag of pre-made french fries into a vat of oil and then lift a small basket, then you aren't worth $15/hr or whatever some hippy dippy "liberal" says you deserve to earn for simply not being brain dead.

The exact same market principles apply when you're the only company in the US who is allowed to produce a product. It's called supply and demand. Try thinking through your argument before you present it.
 

brianmanahan

Lifer
Sep 2, 2006
24,679
6,045
136
Obviously drug companies aren't charities and aren't going to give the product away. But there's no way you can justify an overnight price increase of that amount without it being gouging. That level of greed would make even Gordon Gekko say "whoa, easy there".

maybe they are just looking for the optimal point in supply/demand

i'd much rather sell 1000 pills for 1000$ each than 100,000 pills for 1$ each

of course it helps a lot when you are the only legal supply
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
maybe they are just looking for the optimal point in supply/demand

i'd much rather sell 1000 pills for 1000$ each than 100,000 pills for 1$ each

of course it helps a lot when you are the only legal supply
Evidently they are the only legal supply because of government making them the only legal supply. However, government will never do such things once they are in complete control, because France.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,249
55,799
136
Evidently they are the only legal supply because of government making them the only legal supply. However, government will never do such things once they are in complete control, because France.

That's not the case at all. Try again.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,138
8,731
136
If you're the only person in the country who can do a particular job, then you're worth a lot of money.

If you're one of 300M people in the US who can empty a bag of pre-made french fries into a vat of oil and then lift a small basket, then you aren't worth $15/hr or whatever some hippy dippy "liberal" says you deserve to earn for simply not being brain dead.

The exact same market principles apply when you're the only company in the US who is allowed to produce a product. It's called supply and demand. Try thinking through your argument before you present it.

In principle I agree. If it were for most other things that we want in life sure, why not. But we're talking about an essential drug that people's lives depend on. Surely that makes a difference, doesn't it?

We can go down that road that business is business and morality, compassion for others and simply "doing the right thing" doesn't matter when it comes to making a profit, but this guy, this heartless, greedy, take-no-prisoner apparition that is the quintessential product of the trade that molded his persona, he clearly stepped over the line that separates normal folks from the truly mentally deranged ones. It seems to me that if this guy could corner the market on air, he'd do it in less time than it takes a single synaptic firing off in Stephen Hawking's brain.

Just because he is legally allowed to prey on the sick and needy for fun and profit does not mean he is a perfectly fine human being that we should all just ignore or worse, hoist him up as a shining example of what a capitalistic society is capable of producing and someone our children should emulate right down to that sneering smirk of his.

His behavior should be severely restricted, whether by law or by social isolation just for the good of all mankind. Somewhere down the line he went off the reservation and came back hollowed out except for his myopic desire to "make a killing" any way he can.
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
I also think there is a good chance that this hedge fund guy is shorting big pharma on the side and is trolling the government to get it clamp down on the widespread gouging that's propping up pharma profits.

Trashing companies/sectors that he's shorted is apparently part of his MO. It wouldn't surprise me if that's what his purpose was here.

I don't think he's waiting for government action, though, because I doubt he wants or needs to wait that long. The bad PR and threats of government action alone already shaved a few percentage points off the stock prices of some of the biotechs. Given the volatility of the market lately, I'm surprised it wasn't worse than it was. He certainly succeeded in getting a ton of bad press with his ridiculous antics.
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,429
10,727
136
FDA approval process for manufacturing or importation should be fast tracked. afaik patents on this have run out. It is a really old drug. Should be sold as generic.

Congress and the President should immediately work together, or on their own if necessary, to move the FDA into taking this action.