• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

4GB to 8GB - Worth it?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: TLW
well, i made good on my threat and bought another 4GB - just installed and started up and apart from my windows experience going from 5.5 to 5.9 not much was different, restarted and now firefox starts instantly, and i mean instantly, under a second to clicking the quick launch icon to having google.co.uk fully loaded

currently sitting at 21% in use, will report back once it's settled in

See, to me it's funny that people complain about Vista's RAM usage when it utilizes your RAM to cache things. I'm glad Vista uses as much RAM to cache as it possibly can. I've had nothing but great experiences with Vista64 w/ 4GB ram.
 
Originally posted by: TLW
Update: Hit >50% usage playing Fallout 3 yesterday, loading times are definintely improved, especially the time it takes from clicking the desktop shortcut to programs actually starting

Glad to see 8 GB helps a good amount.
 
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: TLW
Update: Hit >50% usage playing Fallout 3 yesterday, loading times are definintely improved, especially the time it takes from clicking the desktop shortcut to programs actually starting

Glad to see 8 GB helps a good amount.

i know it's entirely subjective, but i'm sure Fallout 3 doesn't crash as frequently as it did before i added the memory...

it used to either CTD or simply freeze once every hour of play or so, with a 6:1 ratio of freezes to CTDs or so

since installing it's frozen once, and had about 3 CTD in 10hrs play or so

"idle" usage is now at 35-40% - but everything loads much faster, even my games like crysis and fallout load much faster, i think vista has pumped superfetch up on steroids and has decided to preload everything:laugh:
 
Originally posted by: Fallengod
All I have to say is, vista 64 must run horrible to notice an improvement from 4gb to 8gb. I do all kinds of crazy intensive applications on my xp 32bit, and I recently upgraded from 2gb to 4gb, and I dont even notice a difference.... Probably the main reason I will never run vista 64 😛

Uhm, does XP 32bit even recognize 4GB? I thought 3GB was the maximum for any 32 bit Windows OS.😕
 
i just ran out of ram today... all 4GB were in use and it was thrashing... time to upgrade to 8GB (and no i don't have "junk" running... i just have about 50 tabs in firefox and chrome open, and I was running vuze in the background and a password recovery tool in the foreground... i wasn't even trying to play games!)

Well, at 35$ shipped for an extra 2x2GB of Gskill DDR2-800 5-5-5-15 @1.8v, its really not bad.
 
Originally posted by: Woofmeister
Originally posted by: Fallengod
All I have to say is, vista 64 must run horrible to notice an improvement from 4gb to 8gb. I do all kinds of crazy intensive applications on my xp 32bit, and I recently upgraded from 2gb to 4gb, and I dont even notice a difference.... Probably the main reason I will never run vista 64 😛

Uhm, does XP 32bit even recognize 4GB? I thought 3GB was the maximum for any 32 bit Windows OS.😕

XP/Vista 32bit can recognize 4GB total for the system. The different installed devices hold open an amount of memory. Your video card has memory as well. In my case with XP and 2x2GB of ram XP saw 3.25GB of system memory. 512 of that missing ~775MB was my video card memory. I assume the missing ~250MB was various devices that are installed that keep certain memory addresses to themselves.

So if you upgrade from 2 to 4GB of memory with a 32 bit OS you'll get more useable memory, but you won't get all of the memory you paid for and installed.
 
Just a minor update.

I installed 2 more 2GB sticks yesterday. 4 matching sticks with their red head spreaders is a nice sight in my case. 🙂 In all honesty I notice no difference in gaming. It seems that Ago of Conan loads up quicker, the levels load quicker. But that's all subjective, I haven't tested 4GB vs. 8GB with a stop watch or anything. When I exit the game my desktop is instantly available for use, before the desktop had to reload. The icons were generic blank icons and would have to reload the correct icons as I left the game, now that's not the case. Also, apps *seem* to load up a bit quicker when I launch things, but again that's just my gut feeling, hardly scientifc.

So, all in all I doubt I'll see any real measureable performance increases, but I got the matching memory for $55 shipped, so if nothing else it may make my machine have a little longer usability before I have to upgrade, it may help with apps I run or games I play a year from now or so. So anyway, I'm satisfied, it was cheap to do and had some minor benefits it seems, though hardly a big deal if you currently have 4GB and were on the fence. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: saiga6360
Is it true that adding more RAM will slow down your boot up time drastically?

I did not notice a difference one way or another. It seems neither faster or slower going from 4GB -> 8GB as far as boot up time is concerned. If there is a change in boot up time it's minimal either way as I can't tell a difference.
 
Adding a faster source hdd will improve bootup time a lot more than adding ram. Especially if you already have 4 gigs.
 
one thing that is vastly under represented in the gaming community is MMO gamers. unlike FPS games, where you cant really do much outside the game, MMO gamers can play the game windowed had have browsers and other apps (such as Advanced Combat Tracker for Everquest2) open and running while they are gaming. when im raiding in everquest2, im generally using somewhere between 3.5 and 5gb total system memory in a comp that has 6GB of ram, though only 2.5GB at most is taken up by eq2. i have seen the combat tracker i run use up to a gig before, after parsing encounter data + custom triggers and graphing it all, a nights raiding can take its tole, but you want the parser open all raid to track things. then you can have your browser open, if you are off questing and want to look at guides, and then i run winamp with a 128kb/s WMA stream from ww.di.fm playing my goa/psy trance. gaming alone? 4gb will be fine. MMO gamer? i would recommend the extra memory. also, if you have multiple accounts, it helps a ton to have a quad core CPU, so you can run both accounts at once without system slowdown. eq2 just got an engine update which offloads some tasks onto a second CPU core (isnt perfect, second core doesnt go to 100% when it should be), so having a quad can be greatly beneficial, even if you play a game like WoW which is single threaded and has minimal system requirements, since running multiple clients at once can put a good bit of strain on a processor
 
Back
Top