WrongIf you thought the G2 was blue i'd hate to think what you'd say when you see a samsung AMOLED display, those are heavily blue compared to most displays.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7586/motorola-moto-g-review/5
WrongIf you thought the G2 was blue i'd hate to think what you'd say when you see a samsung AMOLED display, those are heavily blue compared to most displays.
size is not everything, and the G2's display, despite being smaller by half an inch, is also a pleasure to admire. In fact, we find the screen on LG's flagship slightly more detailed something that doesn't surprise us given its higher pixel density (423ppi vs 386ppi for the Note 3) and the fact that a standard RGB sub-pixel arrangement is in use, as opposed to the Note 3's Diamond sub-pixel panel.
However, as awesome as they may look, both displays have their flaws, and one of them is their not-so-ideal color representation. The typical for AMOLED panels pumped up colors are present on the Note 3 as well, while the LG G2 has its color temperature leaning towards the colder side. Nevertheless, these imperfections are so slight that they are likely to go unnoticed by most users and we don't think they spoil the overall user experience at all. Outdoor usability isn't an issue either. Both screens can be operated comfortably even on a sunny day thanks to their high brightness output and low reflectance.
In terms of display quality, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has better brightness, contrast and a bigger display and that is where its advantages end. In terms of viewing angles and white levels, the display on LG G2 is much better because of its True Full HD IPS+ display. The colors appear largely over-saturated on Galaxy Note 3 while they look quite natural on G2. Being a smaller display, G2 has sharper images.
Overall, the display on LG G2 is slightly better.
G2 has the overly blue tint. I am currently using a Note 3 which has a very well calibrated amoled screen. Unlike the S3 and older amoled, this one is fantastic. However, the best screen I have come across is still 2013 Nexus 7. iPhone 5S is well calibrated too.
Note 3 was bashed pretty hard for NOT being very well calibrated and have fairly noticeable supersaturation problems, like most AMOLED displays, so not sure what you really mean.
the problem is both displays tend to be so good that you probably can't by eye pick the best, you might pick what you THINK is the best, but in reality it would probably just be the over-saturation catching your eye over the cooler colours on the G2 which will seem very subdued when compared directly to the AMOLED, but in reality more colour accurate.
So you're saying this Note3 has less blue than this G2?
Note 3
![]()
G2
![]()
Most decent sites like Anandtech I believe did the review with the above settings. For sure in the default Standard setting with Adapt Display enabled, the display is quite oversaturated. Surprisingly, my sisters like it more saturated than I do.
If I change with the display settings i can make the G2 look better too, we are talking out of the box and how the average person would use it. 1/2 the people I know who have smartphones don't even change the brightness levels let alone care about contrast and colour accuracy.
The AMOLED display by default absolute shit for colour accuracy because of the over saturation, the G2 is slightly cooler, but wayyyyy more colour accurate.
G2 is bashed hard on XDA for the bluish tint but I dont see anyone complaining about Note 3 screen.
You are preaching to the choir here. I hate the typical Samsung bluish tint from the S3 days. Not on this Note 3. Better yet I have yet to see a tablet with a more pleasing screen than the IPS display in my 2013 Nexus 7.
Maybe I can tolerate AMOLED more due to my love for my Panasonic VT60 plasma. Who doesnt like the deep black and vibrancy of colors that pop.
However, as awesome as they may look, both displays have their flaws, and one of them is their not-so-ideal color representation. The typical for AMOLED panels pumped up colors are present on the Note 3 as well, while the LG G2 has its color temperature leaning towards the colder side.
In case people missed this, a colder temperature means a red/yellow tint, not blue. So this is in line with my experience and I don't know why some posters here mentioned a blue tint.