3x cores per CPU

Brian23

Banned
Dec 28, 1999
1,655
1
0
Why aren't people talking about the CPUs that are going to have 3 cores per chip? Everyone talks about the dual and quads, but no tripples. Why is that? 3 cpus should take less die space than 4 so it should be easyer to keep yeilds up.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Because everthing is done in powers of two in order to facilitate easy division of tasks. There are also some more practical issues on the engineering side with timing of 3 devices instead of just halving the timing of a 2 device setup to get the timings for a 4 device setup.
 

fstime

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2004
4,382
5
81
I think people should stop getting ahead of them selves.

Dual core just came out.
 

Brian23

Banned
Dec 28, 1999
1,655
1
0
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals
 

Brian23

Banned
Dec 28, 1999
1,655
1
0
Originally posted by: piroroadkill
Oh jesus.

The Pentium Extreme Edition does not have 4 cores.

It has two cores with HT enabled.

Thats what I said. It's like having 4 cores. That means it has HOT, I mean HT.... with crystals.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Originally posted by: Brian23
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals
Understand why you can't buy a 255MB stick of RAM, and you'll understand why you can't get 3 cores.
 

ai42

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2001
3,653
0
0
Umm like 2 extra logical cores per physical CPU? I suppose it would be possible to to have a hyperthreaded, hyperthreaded CPU. However, considering HT uses extra instructions on the clock cycle using a third logical processor would gain almost no real advantage since the third logical CPU would have almost nothing left on the clock left.

BTW ViRGE is correct on why they don't have 3 physical CPUs, or triple core for that matter.
 

Goi

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
6,771
7
91
This guy is obviously just joking. He can't be THAT stupid...or can he? ;)
 

imported_Tick

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
4,682
1
0
Well, 3 core might make sense, if you had asymetric cores. For instance, 1: 2ghz core, 2: 1 ghz cores. This would make sense if you wanted both single and multi thread preformance.
 

ai42

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2001
3,653
0
0
Originally posted by: Tick
Well, 3 core might make sense, if you had asymetric cores. For instance, 1: 2ghz core, 2: 1 ghz cores. This would make sense if you wanted both single and multi thread preformance.

The mobo would be incredibley complex, also for the fact that the Northbridge/Southbridge + memory controllers would be an absolute nightmare. Nobody in their right mind would even attempt to sell something like that.
 

imported_Tick

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
4,682
1
0
Originally posted by: ai42
Originally posted by: Tick
Well, 3 core might make sense, if you had asymetric cores. For instance, 1: 2ghz core, 2: 1 ghz cores. This would make sense if you wanted both single and multi thread preformance.

The mobo would be incredibley complex, also for the fact that the Northbridge/Southbridge + memory controllers would be an absolute nightmare. Nobody in their right mind would even attempt to sell something like that.

Well, the way to do it would be with a dedicated on-die memory controller for each half of the die, and perhaps a dual-core northbridge. But it could be done.
 

ai42

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2001
3,653
0
0
Originally posted by: Tick
Originally posted by: ai42
Originally posted by: Tick
Well, 3 core might make sense, if you had asymetric cores. For instance, 1: 2ghz core, 2: 1 ghz cores. This would make sense if you wanted both single and multi thread preformance.

The mobo would be incredibley complex, also for the fact that the Northbridge/Southbridge + memory controllers would be an absolute nightmare. Nobody in their right mind would even attempt to sell something like that.

Well, the way to do it would be with a dedicated on-die memory controller for each half of the die, and perhaps a dual-core northbridge. But it could be done.

Oh I'm sure its possible, heck pretty much anything is possible. I just don't see any company actually developing this as a widespread product because there would be very little demand for such a complex product. Also R&D would likely be 2-3 times that of a typical board.
 

imported_Tick

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
4,682
1
0
Originally posted by: ai42
Originally posted by: Tick
Originally posted by: ai42
Originally posted by: Tick
Well, 3 core might make sense, if you had asymetric cores. For instance, 1: 2ghz core, 2: 1 ghz cores. This would make sense if you wanted both single and multi thread preformance.

The mobo would be incredibley complex, also for the fact that the Northbridge/Southbridge + memory controllers would be an absolute nightmare. Nobody in their right mind would even attempt to sell something like that.

Well, the way to do it would be with a dedicated on-die memory controller for each half of the die, and perhaps a dual-core northbridge. But it could be done.

Oh I'm sure its possible, heck pretty much anything is possible. I just don't see any company actually developing this as a widespread product because there would be very little demand for such a complex product. Also R&D would likely be 2-3 times that of a typical board.

I never said it was PROBABLE. Just POSSIBLE.
 

kobymu

Senior member
Mar 21, 2005
576
0
0
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Originally posted by: Brian23
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals
Understand why you can't buy a 255MB stick of RAM, and you'll understand why you can't get 3 cores.

:thumbsup:
 

ai42

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2001
3,653
0
0
Originally posted by: Brian23
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals

BTW WTH is this thing with crystals?!
 

imported_Tick

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
4,682
1
0
Originally posted by: kobymu
Originally posted by: ViRGE
Originally posted by: Brian23
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals
Understand why you can't buy a 255MB stick of RAM, and you'll understand why you can't get 3 cores.

:thumbsup:

:roll:
 

imported_Tick

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2005
4,682
1
0
Originally posted by: ai42
Originally posted by: Brian23
But INtel has that EE version thats like having 4 cores. Why don't they have one with 3. Or you could put an Athlon X2 and a Pentium together to get the best of both worlds: a HOT, I mean HT core!

Edit: with crystals

BTW WTH is this thing with crystals?!


It's from a lamo thread.