3D MARK2003 Scores Please!!!

[AdamK47]

I used a special cheat driver that totally disables the display of anything rendered in 3DMark 2K3 and scored 14532102 3DMarks. Beat that ya bozos!

 

[Dack76]

6183...with Gainward FX 5900 Ultra

 

[BoomAM]

Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I used a special cheat driver that totally disables the display of anything rendered in 3DMark 2K3 and scored 14532102 3DMarks. Beat that ya bozos!

They arent special cheat drivers. They are the latest nVidia drivers. To make their cards seem better than they are
lol.

 

[AdamK47]

Originally posted by: BoomAM

Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I used a special cheat driver that totally disables the display of anything rendered in 3DMark 2K3 and scored 14532102 3DMarks. Beat that ya bozos!

They arent special cheat drivers. They are the latest nVidia drivers. To make their cards seem better than they are
lol.

True, true!

 

[dakels]

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

 

[dakels]

Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I used a special cheat driver that totally disables the display of anything rendered in 3DMark 2K3 and scored 14532102 3DMarks. Beat that ya bozos!

lol

Your card must be crappy cuz I ran that same driver for my geforce 2 mx and got a 24,965,980 in 3DMark! Why should I buy and FX? 3DMark says my comp already slaughters a SGI workstation so there!

 

[AdamK47]

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: AdamK47 - 3DS
I used a special cheat driver that totally disables the display of anything rendered in 3DMark 2K3 and scored 14532102 3DMarks. Beat that ya bozos!

lol

Your card must be crappy cuz I ran that same driver for my geforce 2 mx and got a 24,965,980 in 3DMark! Why should I buy and FX? 3DMark says my comp already slaughters a SGI workstation so there!

Awwwww shucks! You're right and 3DMark is right. There is no point in using my 9800 Pro anymore since it's obviously too slow. I better use it as excrement wipe since I find no other use for it. I just have to make sure not to rub the wrong way with all those pointy edges.

All hail 3DMark! Huzzah! Huzzah!

 

[LeeTJ]

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

3dmark 2003.

 

[5150Joker]

>6900 3dmark03 score..http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1024082

 

[5150Joker]

Originally posted by: videoclone
Thanks guys I see that even with the 3Dmark2003 Patch that is spoused to hurt the score of the FX 5900 card and with the poor performing first release drivers the FX 5900 Over Clocked is faster then 9800 Pro ? mind you it was a hard choice what card to get to finish off my system they both cost the same but the fact the the FX 5900 Card got twice the FPS in Beta DOOM 3 benchmarks was enough to make me think it will own in future games
And for anyone who?s played Homeworld you will know even the most powerful system on earth will slow down on that game due to the fact that theres no unit capping.

For those of you looking for a videocard check out this thing !! ? the Cooling system for the first time actually is COOL !!!!

Albatron Geforce FX 5900 Card Pic's of the beast ! ... Why cant all cards look this cool !

Glad you like your card but it is not as future proof as you may believe. The shader performance is horrible and when DX9 games like HL2 come out that automatically default to PS 2.0/VS 2.0 upon detecing a DX9 card, your 5900 ultra will likely fall quite a ways behind a 9700 pro/9800 pro class card unless nVidia pays off the developer to use special paths for their nv30/nv35 cards. Also, ultra shadow is just marketing not to mention the Doom 3 performance was better because the 5900 ultra uses fp16 for it's custom pathway unlike the radeons that use fp24 (higher quality). As for 3dmark2003, nVidia likely just re-enabled the cheats with their latest drivers in another form and since they encrypt their drivers now, I doubt anyone will be able to catch them doing it.

 

[dakels]

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

3dmark 2003.

YOU GUYS ARE ALL CHEATERSSSS!!!!

 

[LeeTJ]

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

3dmark 2003.

YOU GUYS ARE ALL CHEATERSSSS!!!!

HEY, don't call everyone cheaters. it was my poor memory. i hadn't run the bench in a while.

i reran the 3dmark 2003 and here are the results: NOT 5503 but 5030. Ok so i misremembered. it wasn't a cheat.

 

[lotust]

daym I ran it on my system


XP1900
512mb DDR
Geforce 4 ti4200 or 4600 128mb


and got only 13XX Does that seem right

 

[billyjak]

Thats right for a GF4 Ti 4200, see my score above for my GF4 ti 4200

 

[Stephan28]

5220

Athlon 1700 XP
512 MB 2100 RAM
9800 Pro:beer:

 

[dakels]

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

3dmark 2003.

YOU GUYS ARE ALL CHEATERSSSS!!!!

HEY, don't call everyone cheaters. it was my poor memory. i hadn't run the bench in a while.

i reran the 3dmark 2003 and here are the results: NOT 5503 but 5030. Ok so i misremembered. it wasn't a cheat.

maybe you didnt catch the sarcasm. It was just a joke. I could care less what people get in 3DMark. Now show me some fast render times and framerates and I will care.

 

[Jadow]

Barton 2500 (running at 11.5 X 202) (2334 mhz reported in Windows) 1g of PC3200 Kinston Value Ram at 7333, and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro at 345/345 - 5395 3DMarks.

 

[Wag]

I just purchased a FIC 9700np refurb and flashed it to Pro. What I find particularly interesting is my mid-range setup smacks almost every config that comes close to it.

5402

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1578 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series
392 MHz / 338 MHz

This is on a FIC AU11 (8RDA+) w/PC2100@150 FSB.

 

[LeeTJ]

Originally posted by: Wag
I just purchased a FIC 9700np refurb and flashed it to Pro. What I find particularly interesting is my mid-range setup smacks almost every config that comes close to it.

5402

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP/MP/4 1578 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series
392 MHz / 338 MHz

This is on a FIC AU11 (8RDA+) w/PC2100@150 FSB.

AFAIK you don't flash the 9700 np to pro, you just OC it to pro. the only diff between 9700 np and 9700 pro is the clock speed.


also, it's your clock speeds that give you the 5400, i'm running mine at 325/300.

 

[LeeTJ]

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ

Originally posted by: dakels

Originally posted by: LeeTJ
5503 with my soft modded 9500 (oc'd to 300/325 also)

AXP 2700+
512 3200 OCZ Ram

what!!!! in 3Dmark 2003? :Q

3dmark 2003.

YOU GUYS ARE ALL CHEATERSSSS!!!!

HEY, don't call everyone cheaters. it was my poor memory. i hadn't run the bench in a while.

i reran the 3dmark 2003 and here are the results: NOT 5503 but 5030. Ok so i misremembered. it wasn't a cheat.

maybe you didnt catch the sarcasm. It was just a joke. I could care less what people get in 3DMark. Now show me some fast render times and framerates and I will care.

W/E

i'm just happy with my results. i paid for a 9500 np and ended up getting 9700 pro speeds. not bad. 138 shipped netted me a pretty nice vid card.

 

[Wag]

AFAIK you don't flash the 9700 np to pro, you just OC it to pro. the only diff between 9700 np and 9700 pro is the clock speed.

There are more differences than just that as certain BIOS overclock better than others. I could barely o/c at all on the NP bios, but got a huge stable overclock on the Pro bios.

 

[edmundoab]

just got a new score for 3dmark 03,
now at

5069

instead of the previous 5041
manage to up the FSB from 204 to 211
seems fine for now.... might need a better cooling solution of the summer gets warmer

 

[videoclone]

i used the old 44.03 drivers to test my Geforce ... and the thing about poor shadier Performance is only because of infantile drivers !! .. its been stated in loads of review ... by the time the new games come out new drivers should have fixed these problems with performance.


Remember the ATI 9800 Pro is just a 9700 Pro with a few tweaks so the drivers running the 9700 pro just got ported over and changed to 9800 Pro ... either way it means the 9800 Pro has 1 year of driver maturity over the Geforce FX

 

[mindwreck]

Originally posted by: Falcon2k
My score: 150

P4 1.7Ghz
384mb Ram
Geforce 4 MX440 at 270/405

All stock speeds
Getting old...

150??? whoa thats low

i get 790 on this:
Athlon tbird 1.2ghz
768mb
geforce 2 gts stock
with a geforece 2 mx400 i get ~500

 

[Chu]

Allright, you guys are forcing me to do it Next time I am home i'll see what type of marks I get on my PII 266 /w a Riva128. I am pretty curious actuially ...

-Chu