I agree Deeko that you can not compare different setups.
That is why I specifically said "compare similiar" setups.
With similiar setups, score is accurate, and should be within 5% to 10% or less.
Most that don't like 3dmark, are owners of cards that score poorly. That is not the issue. If you score 1000 and others score 1100, or if you score 9000 and others score 9200, that is the issue.
I don't care what you use for benchmarks, you can not compare different setups. Using Q3, a Celeron at 700, a PIII at 700, and a Duron at 700, would all yield different results, even if they used the same video card. 3DMark is no different.
That is why I specifically said "compare similiar" setups.
With similiar setups, score is accurate, and should be within 5% to 10% or less.
Most that don't like 3dmark, are owners of cards that score poorly. That is not the issue. If you score 1000 and others score 1100, or if you score 9000 and others score 9200, that is the issue.
I don't care what you use for benchmarks, you can not compare different setups. Using Q3, a Celeron at 700, a PIII at 700, and a Duron at 700, would all yield different results, even if they used the same video card. 3DMark is no different.
