37lbs Woman gives birth to child

[Baked]

Whoever got her pregnant must've thought he's humping a giant stuffed animal.

 

[RaistlinZ]

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
My first thought was - 'Who would get in on with a 3" chick in the first place?'

Maybe someone who isn't shallow and sees their is more to beauty than physical apearence.

BUWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH! :laugh: You had me going with that one.

 

[DVK916]

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

 

[DaShen]

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

Again, then. Why be selfish and take the risk instead of adopting? I know it is a hard decision, but anything else is just selfish.

 

[DVK916]

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

Again, then. Why be selfish and take the risk instead of adopting? I know it is a hard decision, but anything else is just selfish.

Do you think people with Huntingtons disease who choose to have children are selfish?

 

[JDrake]

Originally posted by: RaistlinZ

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
My first thought was - 'Who would get in on with a 3" chick in the first place?'

Maybe someone who isn't shallow and sees their is more to beauty than physical apearence.

BUWAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH! :laugh: You had me going with that one.

ROFL :thumbsup:

 

[HermDogg]

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

Again, then. Why be selfish and take the risk instead of adopting? I know it is a hard decision, but anything else is just selfish.

Do you think people with Huntingtons disease who choose to have children are selfish?

Yes.

 

[lederhosen]

Wow. I didn't even know Lindsay Lohan was pregnant. 🙂

 

[DaShen]

Originally posted by: HermDogg

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

Again, then. Why be selfish and take the risk instead of adopting? I know it is a hard decision, but anything else is just selfish.

Do you think people with Huntingtons disease who choose to have children are selfish?

Yes.

QFT

I mean it is hard not to give in to your biological tendencies. But anything other than adoption when it comes down to this is selfish. Why take the risk of having your children suffer, when there is no need? + You would be giving someone who needed the chance to be a great person a chance by adopting.

**EDIT**

I realize that some people have made this choice before and chosen to have kids anyways, and I hope their kids are great. But the initial choice was selfish nonetheless.

 

[Remy XO]

Originally posted by: leftyman
how do you have sex with a 37 lb women, and why would you want to...

WHO WOULD'NT !!!????


:laugh:

 

[BW86]

Originally posted by: ManSnake
I am 6'2", 96lbs.

:shocked:

 

[Rudee]

At first I thought you were talking about her

Also, I've had bowel movements that weighed more than the said women.

 

[BrokenVisage]

Who knocked up Lindsy Lohan?

 

[Rudee]

Originally posted by: ManSnake
I am 6'2", 96lbs.

If they ever make a Schindlers List II, you're certain to find work in the movies.

 

[DrPizza]

Originally posted by: joedrake

Originally posted by: leftyman
how do you have sex with a 37 lb women, and why would you want to...

:beer: For having enough balls to say it

🙂 Well, one of the people replying in this thread posted several times the other day that he saw nothing wrong with a 25 year old getting it on with a 14 year old... Strangely, this thread attracted him too. :shocked: 😉

 

[Bartolo]

i read about this in the Toronto Star

 

[thelanx]

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: HermDogg

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen

Originally posted by: DVK916

Originally posted by: DaShen
great pass on the genetic defect to your kid. :roll:

The kid doesn't have the defect.

Quite a high chance it is recessive and it gets passed on to the kid's kid.

Plus, there was a high chance of it actually being passed on to the kid, she just got lucky (although her other kids who miscarried weren't). Better to just adopt in her case.

1) you are helping out a kid in need
2) you are respecting the fact that you shouldn't pass on that defect, or hurting your biological kids in the first place

Actually the trait is dominant. Type 3 Osteogenesis Imperfecta is a dominant disorder caused by a spontanious gene mutation.

Again, then. Why be selfish and take the risk instead of adopting? I know it is a hard decision, but anything else is just selfish.

Do you think people with Huntingtons disease who choose to have children are selfish?

Yes.

QFT

I mean it is hard not to give in to your biological tendencies. But anything other than adoption when it comes down to this is selfish. Why take the risk of having your children suffer, when there is no need? + You would be giving someone who needed the chance to be a great person a chance by adopting.

**EDIT**

I realize that some people have made this choice before and chosen to have kids anyways, and I hope their kids are great. But the initial choice was selfish nonetheless.

I don't believe it is so clear cut as that. Would you deny your child good food, a big house, a nice environment to grow up in, in order to save a random starving child? In other words, would you give your child the minimum he needs and use the money to save other kids? Probably not, because you wish to maximize the chances of your genes being passed on. I'm not saying that natural pressures are ethically or morally correct. I'm just saying that what you are criticizing these people of happens all the time in our society.

On a related note, there was a story in the Washington Post in which a lesbian couple who were both born deaf decided to have a baby. They got sperm from a donor who had five generations of deafness in his family, with the intent of siring a deaf child. They believed that deaf people were capable of living a complete life, and being deaf was part of their identity. Also, they believed they were better able to raise a deaf child because they were both deaf. This case is bit different in that they could have gotten a normal donor and drastically reduced the child's chances of being deaf without losing any transmission of their own genes. Also, in this case the couple intentionally tried to have a deaf child. (They ended up with two deaf kids)

 

[Fenixgoon]

you people realize that it is just a physical defect, not mental.. hell, her kid could be the next einstein for all we know