Originally posted by: AdamDuritz99
is there really much performance difference between a 3200+ and a 3500+?
peace
sean
Originally posted by: slash196
If you're not gaming or overclocking, even the 3200 might be overkill. I'd go with the 3000+ winchester. If you eventually decide to do some oc'ing, it's a beast, and it'll clean up in games with even a remedial OC.
Originally posted by: LED
Originally posted by: AdamDuritz99
is there really much performance difference between a 3200+ and a 3500+?
peace
sean
Not if you're OCing 😛
Originally posted by: jvarszegi
Originally posted by: LED
Originally posted by: AdamDuritz99
is there really much performance difference between a 3200+ and a 3500+?
peace
sean
Not if you're OCing 😛
Really? With the 3200+ running at 2.4Ghz to provide less performance than the 3500+ running at 2.2GHz? I mean, are these actually the same chip, or can the 3500+ be safely overclocked further? I already expect that both of them are great chips, I'm just curious... Thanks.
Originally posted by: Regs
OCz EB is a start.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Regs
OCz EB is a start.
I was looking at this Corsair 1GB 3200 XMS XL Here
How is that in comparison?
Originally posted by: Regs
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: Regs
OCz EB is a start.
I was looking at this Corsair 1GB 3200 XMS XL Here
How is that in comparison?
Nothing compared to this.
Received Anandtech.com's Editors choice award acheiving 10% more of an overclock than any other RAM in the round up. Not unless you want to spend more on PC4400.
http://www.anandtech.com/memor...c.aspx?i=2145&p=20