350 miles Airplane, Train, or Bus

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
The airport blows the most out of anything.

Driving 350 miles isn't fun, but maybe you can make it a road trip with a few stops. I just got back last week from 24 hours of driving over a week. Didn't feel a thing.
 

Carson Dyle

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2012
8,173
524
126
What are the two cities we're talking about? If you're trying to get the best rate, you don't often have much (if any) choice of airline.
 

Kazukian

Platinum Member
Aug 8, 2016
2,034
650
91
I like using all 3, my favorite is the train, bring along some electronic toys, iPad, etc, and I'm golden.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,600
1,005
126
If train is an option I'd probably do that. By the time you factor in pre/post flying bullshit the train might not be any slower.

A 350 mile flight should take about an hour so I'm going to assume he's factoring in all the TSA and travel to the airport bullshit.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
if train service didn't blow in this country i'd take the train over most everything. bigger seats, bar car, see the countryside, etc.

amazed people don't have their luggage stolen all the time on trains, though.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,600
1,005
126
The airport blows the most out of anything.

Driving 350 miles isn't fun, but maybe you can make it a road trip with a few stops. I just got back last week from 24 hours of driving over a week. Didn't feel a thing.

My wife and I drove 300 miles in some nebulous but comfortable car back in June. 300 miles up to some destination in the middle of the state and 300 miles back 2 days later. The drive up took 7 hours because we took the scenic route. The drive back took about 5.

Anyway, it really depends on the car. If you're driving some little shit box I'd pass on driving.
 
Last edited:

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,672
136
Flying can be exhilarating
2A26537B00000578-3145477-image-a-1_1435771794024.jpg
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,612
3,834
126
Considering 4 out of my 4 flights on my trip to Europe were all Delta, and 4 out of 4 flights were delayed, I could in no way recommend someone use Delta..

Oddly enough Delta operated more than 4 flights during that time period so you might want to rely on over all statistics as opposed to individual anecdotes. They've been leading the majors for a while now on on time performance - often by a huge margin considering the volume of flights (Delta had ~875,000 flights in 2015)

On time performance so far this year:
Delta: 86.99%
United: 82.88%
Southwest: 81.42%
AA: 79.92%

2015 stats:
Delta: 86.14%
Southwest: 79.09%
AA: 76.14%
United: 75.43%

In 2014 Delta was sitting at ~84% while the others were in the mid 70s. (Southwest was last at 72.34%)

http://www.transtats.bts.gov/ot_delay/OT_DelayCause1.asp?pn=1

Related side note - Spirit airlines has an on time rating of just 70% for the year so far. If you look at total minutes delayed for flights Delta has 3x as many minutes delayed as Spirit despite having
 

WiseUp216

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2012
2,251
51
101
www.heatware.com
Anything 400 miles or less, I prefer to drive and get a nice rental car.

Flying is OK but I abhor the airport. Even a 1 hour flight still takes up half your day.

I'd rather walk than take a bus.

In your situation, I'd probably take the train if I didn't want to drive.
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,710
136
With those prices, fly. I haven't flown enough recently to gauge the pervasiveness of power plugs.
flew last week on 3 different planes and none had ports, the the airports did have a limited number and the united flight from chicago to charlotte had in flight wifi.

and flying wasn't as bad as it was a few years ago.