$30k OTD budget

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TraumaRN

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2005
6,893
63
91
Originally posted by: Arkaign
^^ Yeah I'm not sure what's up with Acura of late. Their interiors and technology are still very very good, but they are becoming somewhat bizarre, from the styling to the lukewarm performance. My extremely modestly modded Focus hits 60 in about 7 seconds, with a 1/4 in 15.2, and of course I consider this Focus to be very slow. 8.6 seconds? Holy crap.

My fusion hybrid will do 0-60 faster than that....
 

TechBoyJK

Lifer
Oct 17, 2002
16,699
60
91
Originally posted by: DVad3r
I wouldn't touch that Genesis crap, it's going to be another Tiburon lol.

Did you ever drive the Genesis Sedan? It's hardly a tiburon. I was doing valet one night in St. Louis, and I parked one. I thought I was moving some kind of Mercedes at first. I parked bmw's, benz's, lexus's, etc. and the Genesis was the nicest car. I couldn't believe it was a Hyundai.
 

vshah

Lifer
Sep 20, 2003
19,003
24
81
Originally posted by: Knavish
I'm not sure why people keep bringing up the TSX. I heard good things about the pre-2009 model, but reviews of the latest one sound just plain boring. Here's some quotes from edmund's. As I recall, Road & Track had a similar opinion of the car:

Previously a taut sport sedan offering enthusiasts a lively, communicative driving experience along with Acura quality, the Acura TSX has become more of a luxury sedan for 2009 ... Enthusiasts, however, will likely consider it watered down and boring.

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.

At 22.1 mpg, our fuel economy didn't quite match up to EPA estimates of 21 city, 30 highway and 25 combined.

A stopping distance of 133 feet from 60 mph is respectable?for a big SUV.

The next bummer came upon turning the steering wheel, when we wondered "where did the feel go?" ... The suspension does a respectable job of keeping the car composed in the turns, yet it also seems to have lost the taut, athletic nature of the prior system. Whereas the previous car felt small and nimble, the new one feels still capable but every bit its size.

...you might as well get a Buick.


and now they've stuck the v6 in it.....for almost the price of a TL
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: Arkaign
^^ Yeah I'm not sure what's up with Acura of late. Their interiors and technology are still very very good, but they are becoming somewhat bizarre, from the styling to the lukewarm performance. My extremely modestly modded Focus hits 60 in about 7 seconds, with a 1/4 in 15.2, and of course I consider this Focus to be very slow. 8.6 seconds? Holy crap.

My fusion hybrid will do 0-60 faster than that....

But the TSX will last twice as long; and it's more refined than your ford

The TSX isn't a rocket. It's a nice entry-level luxury car, thats very reliable, and isn't boring to drive.

 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
the TSX was never fast, but the previous version was at least a good drive. when i was testing one out back to back with a V6 accord i was wishing that i could get the TSX's steering and suspension with the accord's drive train. TSX had to shift shift shift to do anything. with the V6 available for 2010 it's finally got the power it needs but it sounds like they've buick'd up the driving.

and isn't boring to drive.
apparently it is, now.


edit: V6 tsx is way too expensive. 35K to start and the only real option is a 'tech package' at 3K. rather get a G37 for that.
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the TSX was never fast, but the previous version was at least a good drive. when i was testing one out back to back with a V6 accord i was wishing that i could get the TSX's steering and suspension with the accord's drive train. TSX had to shift shift shift to do anything. with the V6 available for 2010 it's finally got the power it needs but it sounds like they've buick'd up the driving.

and isn't boring to drive.
apparently it is, now.


edit: V6 tsx is way too expensive. 35K to start and the only real option is a 'tech package' at 3K. rather get a G37 for that.

compared to what though? I haven't driven the new version of the TSX, but I can't imagine it being "boring" to drive. They might have softened the car up a bit, but I'm certain it's still a fine car and far from a buick. I wouldn't spend the extra money and get the V-6 TSX; but I think it's well worth the <$30K price tag the OP is looking for.
 

Funyuns101

Platinum Member
Jun 15, 2002
2,849
0
0
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Originally posted by: ElFenix
the TSX was never fast, but the previous version was at least a good drive. when i was testing one out back to back with a V6 accord i was wishing that i could get the TSX's steering and suspension with the accord's drive train. TSX had to shift shift shift to do anything. with the V6 available for 2010 it's finally got the power it needs but it sounds like they've buick'd up the driving.

and isn't boring to drive.
apparently it is, now.


edit: V6 tsx is way too expensive. 35K to start and the only real option is a 'tech package' at 3K. rather get a G37 for that.

compared to what though? I haven't driven the new version of the TSX, but I can't imagine it being "boring" to drive. They might have softened the car up a bit, but I'm certain it's still a fine car and far from a buick. I wouldn't spend the extra money and get the V-6 TSX; but I think it's well worth the <$30K price tag the OP is looking for.

I have an 07 TSX and had an 09 as loaner for about a week. The new one feels more like a luxury-sporty car than the last gen which was more of a sports-luxury car. If that makes sense - just more emphasis on the lux now than before.
It feels bigger and less nimble. The steering isn't as tight and I was overwhelmed by the amount of buttons at first.
Overall feels more like what I would expect from a Lexus type of car (read: softer). Nevertheless, it's still a very decent car and my opinion is definitely a bit bias.

The TSX can't really fight against the G37 and 335i... but would probably do okay against an IS250 or A4, but with much less torque. I suppose the V6 will improve the power, but I don't know how much torque-steer and weight will be added to it. Sadly, V6 is auto only.
The 2.3L I4 turbo from the RDX might've been a better choice for the TSX.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: Knavish

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.


Holy shit, seriously?

My fucking Tacoma goes 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, and all I've added was cold air and cat-back (so far...) - stock is 7.4

Granted, the Taco is fast for a truck, but still...there's no excuse for a sedan with a 0-60 time above 8 seconds...especially not from a luxury marque.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Originally posted by: jinduy
Let's scratch 4 runners, vans, etc

i'm looking for a car - preferably a 2 door. scratch out hybrids (don't like how it takes up an entire trunk).

ease of maintenance is high on my list... for example, they made it kind of a pain to change the oil on my civic (you pretty much have to go under the car).

currently driving a 2k2 civic and just want some ideas of what you folks would recommend with a 30k budget. if you know of upcoming new models that are hot within the next 3 years, you can count that.

I'm a bit weary of honda cars due to my experience with the civic... i've had a lot of dinky things that cost me a pretty penny just after i was out of warranty (door lock breaking, power window not working, steering wheel issues, etc).

however, i love the practicality of my civic. the trunk and backseat space is pretty good for a small coupe, imo.

with what little you know about me, what do you recommend?

edit:

- new only. when i buy a car, i plan to drive it for at least 7 years. 10+ years would be great!

Not trying to troll here but you pretty much have to go under all cars to change the oil/filter. That being said, I always took my car to the dealer for oil changes while it was under warranty, I figured if anything major broke they couldn't argue that I'd had it properly serviced..
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,350
17,546
126
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Knavish

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.


Holy shit, seriously?

My fucking Tacoma goes 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, and all I've added was cold air and cat-back (so far...) - stock is 7.4

Granted, the Taco is fast for a truck, but still...there's no excuse for a sedan with a 0-60 time above 8 seconds...especially not from a luxury marque.

My wife's MB E350 4Matic does it in 6.5 seconds... There is absolutely no reason for TSX to be slower than that boat.
 

Dman877

Platinum Member
Jan 15, 2004
2,707
0
0
2010 Legacy GT if you like the new style. 28.5k for 265 hp AWD goodness. If I could have waited a year, I would probably have one this fall :)

As for the TSX, the 2004 I had was a lot of fun and pretty nice. They really screwed up with the new one though. It should of had a small V6 or Turbo 4 from the beginning. Now they release a bloated (3700 lbs?!!) V6 at a price competing with RWD sports sedans from Audi, BMW, and Infiniti... good luck.

Hell, Hyundai just gave us a RWD coupe, how many people here would be all over a coupe built on the S2000 platform with a turbo 4 and an Integra or RSX nameplate?
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Subaru makes a good car, but Always-On AWD systems are just fucking expensive to manufacture, hence the high price of Subies compared to competitors.

I admire the company though - they get better and better with every generation of redesigns and no one seems to notice. They're flying entirely under the public radar, and it's paying off for their company.

Originally posted by: DVad3r
I wouldn't touch that Genesis crap, it's going to be another Tiburon lol.

...Try again. The Genesis has gotten nothing but praise from pretty much everyone that matters. The only knock people seem to be able to bring against it is "it's a Hyundai".

Time will tell on reliability, but they seem to have gotten everything else right with the Genesis. Much like Subaru, Hyundai has been steadily getting better without anyone noticing. Stigmas take a long time to shake in the auto industry, mainly because people are ill informed.

Mark my words, quote it, whatever you want....Hyundai will be the first Korean vehicle manufacturer that the Euros and Japanese have to take seriously as competition...if they haven't already.
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Knavish

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.


Holy shit, seriously?

My fucking Tacoma goes 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, and all I've added was cold air and cat-back (so far...) - stock is 7.4

Granted, the Taco is fast for a truck, but still...there's no excuse for a sedan with a 0-60 time above 8 seconds...especially not from a luxury marque.

My wife's MB E350 4Matic does it in 6.5 seconds... There is absolutely no reason for TSX to be slower than that boat.

Guys, the Tacoma and the MB E350 have 6 cylinder engines. Compare the MB E350 to the TL or the RL.

Squeezing 200hp-205hp out of a naturally aspired 4 banger is pretty good.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,350
17,546
126
Originally posted by: krunchykrome

Guys, the Tacoma and the MB E350 have 6 cylinder engines. Compare the MB E350 to the TL or the RL.

Squeezing 200hp-205hp out of a naturally aspired 4 banger is pretty good.

The ES350 is also close to 4000lbs. My point is, for a car that is supposed to be a sports sedan, it should not be slower than a car that is designated landboat.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Knavish

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.


Holy shit, seriously?

My fucking Tacoma goes 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, and all I've added was cold air and cat-back (so far...) - stock is 7.4

Granted, the Taco is fast for a truck, but still...there's no excuse for a sedan with a 0-60 time above 8 seconds...especially not from a luxury marque.

My wife's MB E350 4Matic does it in 6.5 seconds... There is absolutely no reason for TSX to be slower than that boat.

Guys, the Tacoma and the MB E350 have 6 cylinder engines. Compare the MB E350 to the TL or the RL.

Squeezing 200hp-205hp out of a naturally aspired 4 banger is pretty good.


Numbers on paper don't mean shit. The Tacoma has significantly lower hp and torque ratings than the Nissan Frontier, the closest thing it has to a competitor (there really isn't one), but it spanks the Frontier in pretty much every real world test because the majority of the engine's power is available earlier in the band. No one drives their car 200 RPM below redline during real-world use.

The number that matters more is powertrain efficiency. Engine power ratings come from the manufacturer as measured at the crankshaft, not the tires. A lower rated, more efficient powertrain could very well be delivering more scoot to the wheels than a higher rated engine with a less efficient tranny. The Tacoma has a masterfully efficient drivetrain, losing only about 12% of its power between the crankshaft and the wheels in stock configurations. Most vehicles lose somewhere from 15 to 20%. This is what accounts for its un-trucklike abilities in areas like acceleration and top speed.

The point is, the Tacoma and E350 may have 6 cylinders, but they're also MUCH heavier than the TSX. Both are close to 4000lbs. They should, given lower power to weight ratios, be slower than the TSX.

Having a vehicle move that slowly, especially in the luxury marque market, is just shitty engineering, and Honda should know better. They're certainly capable of better. They mated an engine and transmission that apparently just don't work well together.

 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: ja1484
Originally posted by: Knavish

We clocked the 0-60-mph sprint at 8.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile run taking 16.3 seconds ... most V6-equipped family sedans would still have no trouble showing their taillights to the TSX, beating it to 60 by 1 or 2 seconds.


Holy shit, seriously?

My fucking Tacoma goes 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, and all I've added was cold air and cat-back (so far...) - stock is 7.4

Granted, the Taco is fast for a truck, but still...there's no excuse for a sedan with a 0-60 time above 8 seconds...especially not from a luxury marque.

My wife's MB E350 4Matic does it in 6.5 seconds... There is absolutely no reason for TSX to be slower than that boat.

Guys, the Tacoma and the MB E350 have 6 cylinder engines. Compare the MB E350 to the TL or the RL.

Squeezing 200hp-205hp out of a naturally aspired 4 banger is pretty good.


Numbers on paper don't mean shit. The Tacoma has significantly lower hp and torque ratings than the Nissan Frontier, the closest thing it has to a competitor (there really isn't one), but it spanks the Frontier in pretty much every real world test because the majority of the engine's power is available earlier in the band. No one drives their car 200 RPM below redline during real-world use.

The number that matters more is powertrain efficiency. Engine power ratings come from the manufacturer as measured at the crankshaft, not the tires. A lower rated, more efficient powertrain could very well be delivering more scoot to the wheels than a higher rated engine with a less efficient tranny. The Tacoma has a masterfully efficient drivetrain, losing only about 12% of its power between the crankshaft and the wheels in stock configurations. This is what accounts for its un-trucklike abilities in areas like acceleration and top speed.


The point is, the Tacoma and E350 may have 6 cylinders, but they're also MUCH heavier than the TSX. Both are close to 4000lbs.

Having a vehicle move that slowly, especially in the luxury marque market, is just shitty engineering, and Honda should know better. They're certainly capable of better. They mated an engine and transmission that apparently just don't work well together.

Honda/Acura have never been horsepower showboaters; they're more concerned with reliability, refinement, and efficient high-reving engines

For $30k, you can't have everything. Name a competitor to the TSX (with the exception of a fully loaded Accord) that provides reliability, a fun driving experience, and entry-level luxury....?

Just look at this
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Ok, just looked up the curb weight on the Acura TSX: 3400+ lbs.

That explains the problem. It should never have even been offered with a 4 cylinder. That sucker is heavy for the size, and 4 bangers aren't going to make enough torque to get it moving off the line with alacrity.

Probably does fine in the top end, but acceleration = fun to drive, not top speed.


Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Honda/Acura have never been horsepower showboaters; they're more concerned with reliability, refinement, and efficient high-reving engines

For $30k, you can't have everything. Name a competitor to the TSX (with the exception of a fully loaded Accord) that provides reliability, a fun driving experience, and entry-level luxury....?

Just look at this


You're switching to a different argument and getting off topic. I'm not questioning Honda's reliability or build quality. I'm saying the current-gen TSX's acceleration is shit and inexcusable in a luxury brand, and that Honda fucked up and can damn well do better.

It's disappointing really, because Honda's line of vehicles under their Honda marque are pretty much all best-in-class with the exception of the Ridgeline (that thing is a joke). If I were looking for a sedan or coupe right now it would be a Honda, no question.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,350
17,546
126
Originally posted by: krunchykrome

Honda/Acura have never been horsepower showboaters; they're more concerned with reliability, refinement, and efficient high-reving engines

For $30k, you can't have everything. Name a competitor to the TSX (with the exception of a fully loaded Accord) that provides reliability, a fun driving experience, and entry-level luxury....?

Just look at this

Subaru Legacy? Mazda RX-8? Mazda 6? Mazdaspeed 3?


No one mentioned HPs, just the fact that a sport sedan in this day and get should not put out 8.6s.

I think my 02 Protege5 does it in 10.5 seconds...And that is an econobox...
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: krunchykrome

Honda/Acura have never been horsepower showboaters; they're more concerned with reliability, refinement, and efficient high-reving engines

For $30k, you can't have everything. Name a competitor to the TSX (with the exception of a fully loaded Accord) that provides reliability, a fun driving experience, and entry-level luxury....?

Just look at this

Subaru Legacy? Mazda RX-8? Mazda 6? Mazdaspeed 3?


No one mentioned HPs, just the fact that a sport sedan in this day and get should not put out 8.6s.

I think my 02 Protege5 does it in 10.5 seconds...And that is an econobox...

Legacy :thumbsup:

Mazda :thumbsdown: I don't consider Mazda to be up to par with Subaru and Acura's reliablity

Hmm, I wonder what my 04 TSX does in 0-60....It's definetly not a fast car, but it moves fast enough.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,350
17,546
126
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: krunchykrome

Honda/Acura have never been horsepower showboaters; they're more concerned with reliability, refinement, and efficient high-reving engines

For $30k, you can't have everything. Name a competitor to the TSX (with the exception of a fully loaded Accord) that provides reliability, a fun driving experience, and entry-level luxury....?

Just look at this

Subaru Legacy? Mazda RX-8? Mazda 6? Mazdaspeed 3?


No one mentioned HPs, just the fact that a sport sedan in this day and get should not put out 8.6s.

I think my 02 Protege5 does it in 10.5 seconds...And that is an econobox...

Legacy :thumbsup:

Mazda :thumbsdown: I don't consider Mazda to be up to par with Subaru and Acura's reliablity

Hmm, I wonder what my 04 TSX does in 0-60....It's definetly not a fast car, but it moves fast enough.

I don't really care much about the statistical reliability method. Bottom line, if you are unlucky, you are going to get a lemon, no matter who you buy it from.

And the Ford Fusion = Mazda 6, so their reliability should be on par. Speed 3 and RX8 are probably more finicky but that comes with the territory of enthusiast cars.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,350
17,546
126
To op, seriously consider an off lease. You can definitely get 7 years out of a slightly used E350 :)


Back in Dec08/Jan 09 I was shopping for a car. Instead of getting a new Camry/Altima/6/Accord, I got an 06 E350 4Matic with 42,000 km on it.


PS I got it off a Ford dealership in Peoria of all things...


here is an 07 CLK350 with 32k asking 27k

07 MB CLK350


shit, screw that, here is an 07 SLK280 with 24k mi asking 29k

07 SLK280


Just noticed you are in california. There is a lot of good deals in Cali.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: Arkaign
^^ Yeah I'm not sure what's up with Acura of late. Their interiors and technology are still very very good, but they are becoming somewhat bizarre, from the styling to the lukewarm performance. My extremely modestly modded Focus hits 60 in about 7 seconds, with a 1/4 in 15.2, and of course I consider this Focus to be very slow. 8.6 seconds? Holy crap.

My fusion hybrid will do 0-60 faster than that....

Eh? Apparently, the Fusion Hybrid 0-60 time is 8.7 seconds.
 

ja1484

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2007
2,438
2
0
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: DeathBUA
Originally posted by: Arkaign
^^ Yeah I'm not sure what's up with Acura of late. Their interiors and technology are still very very good, but they are becoming somewhat bizarre, from the styling to the lukewarm performance. My extremely modestly modded Focus hits 60 in about 7 seconds, with a 1/4 in 15.2, and of course I consider this Focus to be very slow. 8.6 seconds? Holy crap.

My fusion hybrid will do 0-60 faster than that....

Eh? Apparently, the Fusion Hybrid 0-60 time is 8.7 seconds.

He said "his" fusion hybrid. Key difference.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,393
8,552
126
Originally posted by: krunchykrome
compared to what though? I haven't driven the new version of the TSX, but I can't imagine it being "boring" to drive. They might have softened the car up a bit, but I'm certain it's still a fine car and far from a buick. I wouldn't spend the extra money and get the V-6 TSX; but I think it's well worth the <$30K price tag the OP is looking for.

road & track said it was boring to drive. the blurbs were posted yesterday morning.