The NRA has done its best to fuel paranoia to gun nuts from the second Sandy Hook happened, and that increased gun sales enormously. Fueling paranoia amongst the craziest is a good way to make money if you sell something that caters to them. You have NRA brainwashed nutsos sit here and call background checks unconstitutional when the NRA themselves was all for them up until someone actually tried to do it.
As far as my "worst of society" comment. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying they're worse than rapists and murderers and what have you. Those people have chosen to violate the rules of society and can no longer be considered part of it. However the NRA makes money off of violence in society. Anyone that profits from violence deserves to be called the worst of society.
So if taggants are a good idea, why don't any other countries use them besides Switzerland? Do the paranoid idiots bashing the NRA think that the NRA controls all the world's governments?
Why don't our own military and police use them?
The liberals have fueld that fear by enacting insane legislation taking away the ability to purchase or own guns. Holy fuck when are you going to understand that?
If By asking to have a public discourse is insane by your definition then you need to reexamine your command of the English language.
If by enact you mean propose then that's a another word you need to research. I recommend remedial English.
Those laws in NY, Conn, Colorado that were passed and proposed laws in Cal have been fueling the frenzy. It is difficult to blame the NRA for fueling paranoia when the left is actually implementing their dire predictions.
I suggest to stop dragging your knuckles and get out of the cave you have been living within.
I'd rather drag my knuckles in a cave than live in a society obsessed with killing machines that has the highest gun related violence of all first world countries..
That's pure bullshit. Gun sales increased once Obama became president (actually its been growing since 2000) and no gun legislation was being pushed or even mentioned other than Obama signing a law allowing people to bring firearms into national parks.
Those laws in NY, Conn, Colorado that were passed and proposed laws in Cal have been fueling the frenzy. It is difficult to blame the NRA for fueling paranoia when the left is actually implementing their dire predictions.
I suggest to stop dragging your knuckles and get out of the cave you have been living within.
... It's a slimy attempt to shut down the debate before it ever happens.
Why would you be scared of nuclear weapons being in private hands?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the correct scorecard for people murdered by nuclear weapons is:
Government: ~250,000
Private citizen: 0
I'd rather drag my knuckles in a cave than live in a society obsessed with killing machines that has the highest gun related violence of all first world countries..
The frenzy you describe isnt rooted in fact or reality. All we hear is infantile slippery slope arguments. What you have to realize is most of us lawful gun owners like myself are capable of a rational discussion on registration to try to address problems.
I may have taken the thread a bit off topic so I apologize.
Again can you refute my assertion most of the frenzy is not proportional to reality?
It is like you live within an alternate reality where gun bans and new laws werent enacted since Sandy Hook. How can anybody claim the NRA is fueling the paranoia when democrats are doing what the NRA and gun rights supported said they would do? Feeding frenzy not proportional to reality is if the NRA said bans and restrictions were coming and they never happened. This feeding frenzy is directly proportional to democrats restricting and banning guns. The democrats are the source of the feeding frenzy, not the NRA.
As a Democrat, I have no problem debating these gun laws. Though, as a math & science person, I understand the "Republican" side perfectly well. These new laws do absolutely nothing to curb violence.Like I said, they attempt to shut down the debate before it gets started. Debating laws with a Democrat is like trying to tell them that the parrot they sold you is nailed to its perch.
Everything is relative. Even our "highest gun related violence" is relatively low. Furthermore, the gun related violence attributed to hot-button "killing machines" like "assault rifles" and "high-capacity magazines" is almost non-existent.I'd rather drag my knuckles in a cave than live in a society obsessed with killing machines that has the highest gun related violence of all first world countries..
As a Democrat, I have no problem debating these gun laws. Though, as a math & science person, I understand the "Republican" side perfectly well. These new laws do absolutely nothing to curb violence.
I'd rather drag my knuckles in a cave than live in a society obsessed with killing machines that has the highest gun related violence of all first world countries..