• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

'30-a-day smoker' plans a smokers' airline

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
 
wow...there are some huge fcking bastards in here. Why do people hate smokers SO much? There are plenty of harmful things people do to themselves that can harm others too....i think if you have SUCH a bad attitude for it...go start smoking yourself...give it a week or two and see the other side...i admit, it isnt the best habbit, but its my ****** right to do it and i enjoy it so why the hell not? I figure people should have the freedom to do what they please, so long as it doesnt infringe on someone else's rights. Ex. I dont smoke pot, or do any other drugs, and i think they are extremely bad for someones physical and mental health. But, should someone be able to smoke pot so long as they arent endangering someone? Sure! Why the hell not. If someone wants to ****** i nthere basement and blaze up for a while, let them! Its such a waste of money to keep fighting all these drugs wars...why not go the way of alchohol? Legalize it, but restrictions on it, tax it, and be done. Tons of people die over alcohol, let them die over drugs.

However, it is the countries duties to protect its citizens, but should it be protecting us from ourselves? Hmmmmm....
 
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !

you're such a dumbass...all that would do is piss people off even more and further segregate everyone. We would start to have huge ass fights just like gay marriage and all hell would break loose...

Go to the store, buy some camels and smoke for a week or two. You CAN NOT appreciate the other side and have all your bogus views unless you have experienced it.
 
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: xrax
don't all you smokers get the point. Smoking is bad for you and us non-smokers end up paying the bill for your medical treatment when you get sick.

Ok, here is a thought...

How about we take all the taxes we pay on smokes and use it to pay for our own medical treatment?

Instead of doing that, lets raise the taxes on cigarettes so that they actually pay for the cost of smoking in healthcare costs, welfare costs, and lost productivity ?

Cig taxes are higher than any other product in the country. And the amount of money that actually goes on medical care for smokers in tiny by comparison.

We are already paying almost $7.50 a pack here in NJ. How much of that do you think goes to treat smokers medical conditions?


I don't think it should go for treating medical conditions of smokers. I think it should go to directly to non-smokers.
edit: nevermind.
:roll:
 
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Tom

I don't think it should go for treating medical conditions of smokers. I think it should go to directly to non-smokers.
Wait... you are saying that the government should take the money that smokers pay in taxes and then refuse to treat smokers, instead giving it to non smokers?

That's exactly what he's saying.
 
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.


 
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.

It's a bad idea to start drinking this early in the day.
 
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.

why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?
 
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.

why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?


It's called a meritocracy.
 
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.

why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?


It's called a meritocracy.

Your idea of a meritocracy is a far cry from what one actually is.
 
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?

After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.

Brilliant !
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.

how old are you, 12?


I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.

why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?


It's called socialism.

Fixed.
 
Back
Top