Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
edit: nevermind.Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: xrax
don't all you smokers get the point. Smoking is bad for you and us non-smokers end up paying the bill for your medical treatment when you get sick.
Ok, here is a thought...
How about we take all the taxes we pay on smokes and use it to pay for our own medical treatment?
Instead of doing that, lets raise the taxes on cigarettes so that they actually pay for the cost of smoking in healthcare costs, welfare costs, and lost productivity ?
Cig taxes are higher than any other product in the country. And the amount of money that actually goes on medical care for smokers in tiny by comparison.
We are already paying almost $7.50 a pack here in NJ. How much of that do you think goes to treat smokers medical conditions?
I don't think it should go for treating medical conditions of smokers. I think it should go to directly to non-smokers.
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Wait... you are saying that the government should take the money that smokers pay in taxes and then refuse to treat smokers, instead giving it to non smokers?Originally posted by: Tom
I don't think it should go for treating medical conditions of smokers. I think it should go to directly to non-smokers.
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.
why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.
why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?
It's called a meritocracy.
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Originally posted by: Tom
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Under that genius logic we can tax quite a bit of stuff. Basically anything YOU personally dont agree with should be taxed heavily and the revenues go to you.Originally posted by: Tom
I thought the taxes were there to discourage smoking ?
After thinking about it, i think my idea is perfect. Give the tax revenues directly to non-smokers. Any smoker who doesn't like it can stop smoking, and then they'll get cash too.
Brilliant !
how old are you, 12?
I'm glad you agree. It's just like the lottery tax. I don't pay it, because I don't play it.
why are you the only one entitled to the tax revenue if you're the one not paying?
It's called socialism.
Originally posted by: Garth
I understand that LAX is now selling a nicotine-infused water drink that is supposedly equivalent to 2 cigarettes per bottle. I'll see if I can find a link.
EDIT:
http://xo.typepad.com/blog/2006/06/company_develop.html