And then you could have a 8-core 14nm die that is smaller than Broadwell Quad Core + GT3 iGPU next year. Do you push enthusiasts to HEAD platform and make more profit or stay at mainstream and keep the GPU market share ??
Before this happens though, I would like to see Intel go all out with various unlocked dual cores. (Celeron, Pentium, Core i3, etc.)
Before this happens though, I would like to see Intel go all out with various unlocked dual cores. (Celeron, Pentium, Core i3, etc.)
But not on the HEDT platform, because that would make no sense. Cheap chips, with the packaging and chipset price overhead of 2011-3 and X99?
Oh yes, I definitely agree with you. Quad core minimum for the future "cost reduced" Big socket stuff.
With respect to unlocked Celeron, Pentium, i3 dual cores, I was meaning what we now call the mainstream socket, before they become obsolete for LGA desktop.
Oh, mainstream socket? That would be cool, before the low-end gets completely replaced by Atom CPUs on the desktop.
At the present time, a hexcore with per-core performance inferior to a mainstream i7 carries a substantial price premium. The 4930K is about $96 per core compared to $85 per core for the 4790K. I expect this to continue, though to a lesser extent, since this time octacores will be in the mix, garnering the highest per-core premiums overall.
Setting up my G3258 + GA-B85M-DS3H. Came with F3 BIOS, dated 4/9/14 and doesn't let me overclock yet. Currently updating to BIOS F6b. Under load my vid is 1.053v. Idles at 24w (2x4GB G.Skill Sniper Low Voltage 1600, Coolermaster GX-450w, only 1 SSD), loads at 48w.
VCore only goes up to 1.2v on this board, sad. I can hit 3.9GHz 1.048vcore with this batch 3412B733 chip, using the iGPU. 4GHz needs a big jump using 1.2v (Nevermind, just froze during Prime95). Looks like I'm limited with this certain CPU + mobo combo.
I agree, but I think the price premium will continue, though to a lesser extent as stated. I think it would be weird for Intel to suddenly decide to give away high performance technology at mainstream prices when there is nobody that can touch then performance-wise. I can't think of any vendor I do business with that would do that. If you want the best, you have to pay, no matter what it is.But in order for that to not change, they'd have to make the entry-level HEDT CPU cost more than $510 dollars. I don't see them doing that just to keep the cost per core high. That would do them more harm than good.
I agree, but I think the price premium will continue, though to a lesser extent as stated. I think it would be weird for Intel to suddenly decide to give away high performance technology at mainstream prices when there is nobody that can touch then performance-wise. I can't think of any vendor I do business with that would do that. If you want the best, you have to pay, no matter what it is.
I don't see any evidence that Intel considers other components of HEDT systems when determining their price premiums. Seriously, in a way high costs for these bleeding-edge systems may eventually spur a competitor to enter the HEDT arena, or whatever it shall be called once that happens. Until then it's Intel calling the shots, unfortunately or not.Again, you still need to buy a more expensive board and DDR4 RAM for it. $350-400 seems reasonable.
I don't see any evidence that Intel considers other components of HEDT systems when determining their price premiums. Seriously, in a way high costs for these bleeding-edge systems may eventually spur a competitor to enter the HEDT arena, or whatever it shall be called once that happens. Until then it's Intel calling the shots, unfortunately or not.
I'm more than willing to learn those views, but if they involve irrational altruism in regard to a luxury item, I may not be terribly receptive.I was looking at it in terms of market segmentation, actually. We just have different views on this.
VCore only goes up to 1.2v on this board, sad. I can hit 3.9GHz 1.048vcore with this batch 3412B733 chip, using the iGPU. 4GHz needs a big jump using 1.2v (Nevermind, just froze during Prime95). Looks like I'm limited with this certain CPU + mobo combo.
Currently priming (about 1 hour into the run) at 4.5 Ghz with 1.3 volts vcore and 1.25 cpu ring voltage.
Ambient: ~20C
Open Air
There was no throttling of any sort at the beginning of the test like the first one.
CPU temps are currently high 60s.
The above run was successful with no throttling throughout the test.
=============================================================
Currently priming at 4.6 Ghz (stock cooler) with 1.3 volts vcore and 1.25 cpu ring voltage.
Ambient: ~ 18C
Open Air
CPU temps are currently high 60s.(sometimes hitting 70 or 71C)
