2nd Amendment rights?

[Matthiasa]

Hate to tell you this but the Supreme Court could could just as easily say otherwise if a shift in political leanings of the Supreme Court were to change.

OH and a question to you, should convicted murderers be allowed to have guns?

 

[shortylickens]

Wrong forum newb!

 

[HannibalX]

[FONT=&quot]I was wondering if the people on this forum are pro 2nd Amendment rights?

Also do you think it is right for people to openly carry a gun in public? As long as they are abiding by all the laws?[/FONT]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRuUEDfVdm4

 

[nick1985]

Hate to tell you this but the Supreme Court could could just as easily say otherwise if a shift in political leanings of the Supreme Court were to change.

OH and a question to you, should convicted murderers be allowed to have guns?

You didnt answer my question. Its post #25 in this thread in case you missed it.

 

[marvdmartian]

The problem is that the writers of the Constitution knew this as a gun:

And had no idea this would turn out to be a gun:

Would those be the same people who knew that in recent historical times (to them), armies fought with long bows, pikes and swords? And that those same armies fought with black powder muskets during their time?

Wow.....those guys must have been pretty short-sighted, to not be able to figure out that technological advances might some day take armies past the use of muskets!!

 

[Matthiasa]

That had been stuck at musket level technology for hundreds of years though.

You didnt answer my question. Its post #25 in this thread in case you missed it.

Well yeah It would, they would have to be part of said association to be well regulated.

 

[HannibalX]

Well yeah It would, they would have to be part of said association to be well regulated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRuUEDfVdm4

 

[Matthiasa]

So do you get all your knowledge from stage personalities?

 

[HannibalX]

So do you get all your knowledge from stage personalities?

Go ahead, you know your wrong, attack the presentation, it's what a coward would do.

 

[Proprioceptive]

Would those be the same people who knew that in recent historical times (to them), armies fought with long bows, pikes and swords? And that those same armies fought with black powder muskets during their time?

Wow.....those guys must have been pretty short-sighted, to not be able to figure out that technological advances might some day take armies past the use of muskets!!

The sad part is that you have to actually spell it out...

 

[clamum]

Would those be the same people who knew that in recent historical times (to them), armies fought with long bows, pikes and swords? And that those same armies fought with black powder muskets during their time?

Wow.....those guys must have been pretty short-sighted, to not be able to figure out that technological advances might some day take armies past the use of muskets!!

No shit. Trolls ftl.

 

[shortylickens]

Go ahead, you know your wrong, attack the presentation, it's what a coward would do.

 

[Matthiasa]

Go ahead, you know your wrong, attack the presentation, it's what a coward would do.

If you are trying to back up your side with links to things done by other people, at least link to stuff from people knowledgeable with in the subject at hand, and not people that do (or did) stage acts, and are at best simple entertainers.

 

[HannibalX]

If you are trying to back up your side with links to things done by other people, at least link to stuff from people knowledgeable with in the subject at hand, and not people that do (or did) stage acts, and are at best simple entertainers.

Again, attack the presentation because you know you're wrong, that's all you can do.

 

[Matthiasa]

Umm if that's what you want to believe. Delusion is such a wonderful thing.
(read you missed the whole point of the post)

 

[Proprioceptive]

If you are trying to back up your side with links to things done by other people, at least link to stuff from people knowledgeable with in the subject at hand, and not people that do (or did) stage acts, and are at best simple entertainers.

...who have the ability to think for themselves, right? Cause in your state, simple entertainers can't think or be knowledgeable about a simple amendment?

 

[HannibalX]

Umm if that's what you want to believe. Delusion is such a wonderful thing.
(read you missed the whole point of the post)

It has nothing to do with that I believe, it is what you have done in this thread and it's plain to see. You didn't attack the content you attacked the presentation, twice. Why? Because you have no argument against their message only them individually. Pathetic.

 

[Matthiasa]

I'm saying it is better to link to people whose knowledge in more then just based on a simple opinion on the subject at hand.

To put it more simply you wouldn't ask an entertainer to be your source for lets say a paper your doing when the subject it is about is not their specialty.

 

[HannibalX]

read you missed the whole point of the post

Uhh, no. If you want to say you do not support 2nd amendment protection of gun rights that's fine but you can't deny that the protections exist which is what you are doing.

 

[Proprioceptive]

I'm saying it is better to link to people whose knowledge in more then just based on a simple opinion on the subject at hand.

To put it more simply you wouldn't ask an entertainer to be your source for lets say a paper your doing when the subject it is about is not their specialty.

I guess this is where I leave and let the troll starve.

 

[HannibalX]

I'm saying it is better to link to people whose knowledge in more then just based on a simple opinion on the subject at hand.

To put it more simply you wouldn't ask an entertainer to be your source for lets say a paper your doing when the subject it is about is not their specialty.

No, you're simply attacking the presenters of a message because you can't find fault in the message, that's it right there. You know that you're wrong and are trying to discredit the message because you have no alternative. Pathetic.

 

[Proprioceptive]

Uhh, no. If you want to say you do not support 2nd amendment protection of gun rights that's fine but you can't deny that the protections exist which is what you are doing.

Troll is troll. Let's let him starve. Clearly he doesn't get it.

 

[HannibalX]

I guess this is where I leave and let the troll starve.

Agreed. :thumbsup:

 

[Matthiasa]

Uhh, no. If you want to say you do not support 2nd amendment protection of gun rights that's fine but you can't deny that the protections exist which is what you are doing.

Okay let me spell it out for you, since you're having issues understanding it.

That is their opinion on it, their interpretation of it. That's the fun part about the English language, and well language in general, it is up to individual interpretation, especially when imprecise language is used.

 

[Slew Foot]

Some people love America. Other are communists who want to take away others rights.