• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2900 3dmark05 points for X1300LE

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
English: We found out many english sites are linking us. We don't have this video card, we just found this information in a Chinese forum and now the link is broken.

:roll:
 
it'll be 100-120 at launch but this card is supposed to be sub 100, its replacing the x300se, i could have gotten one on ebay last month for 15 bucks
 
garrr more speculation!!! Its killing me. Why doesn't ATI just release the cards tommorow so we can see what all the fuss is about!
 
LOL, they're trying to manufacture alot to get some available for shelves so it's not only a paper launch... at least for the mid range.
 
Nvidia is going to have to bring out their mid and low 7 series pretty soon, or ATI will have the advantage in the mid and low range arena, which is a much more profitable arena than the high end. This x1300 series gets about what my x700pro gets in 2k5, which shows that the architecture has been drastically improved, considering my x700pro has twice the pipelines. If these results are true, I think this performance leap could be greater than the 9800-x800 series leap. All just speculation though.
 
Am I the only person who notices that there's no way of telling what video card they put in there AT ALL? For reasons unknown they blurred the core number on their "close up" and then none of the other SS's have anything on them, except one that says "Radeon X....." with the rest blocked off. So how are we supposed to know that it's an X300SE?
 
Does anyone know what this means when it pertains to memory?

256Mbit DDR2 Addressing
and
16x16 addressing?

Well anyway, here is a link to the exact memory pictured in the article.
The thing is, I cant find whether it is 64,128, or 256-bit memory. Since the core numbers were blurred out for no apparent reason other than to hide something, (what for?) I think we should use what we do have (memory numbers) to at least see if this is a 256-bit card or not.

Infineon memory link HYB18T256161AF-25
 
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Does anyone know what this means when it pertains to memory?

256Mbit DDR2 Addressing
and
16x16 addressing?

Well anyway, here is a link to the exact memory pictured in the article.
The thing is, I cant find whether it is 64,128, or 256-bit memory. Since the core numbers were blurred out for no apparent reason other than to hide something, (what for?) I think we should use what we do have (memory numbers) to at least see if this is a 256-bit card or not.

Infineon memory link HYB18T256161AF-25

It says right in the article that this is a 128-bit card. These are low-end cards, they only come in 64 or 128-bit versions.

Looking for some way to discredit the benchmarks, are we?
 
I find 2900 in '05 hard to believe.

4pp 450/400... the clockspeeds don't even match a 9600XT. And that scores around 2000 in '05. Can the new architecture really boost scores by such a large amount?
 
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Does anyone know what this means when it pertains to memory?

256Mbit DDR2 Addressing
and
16x16 addressing?

Well anyway, here is a link to the exact memory pictured in the article.
The thing is, I cant find whether it is 64,128, or 256-bit memory. Since the core numbers were blurred out for no apparent reason other than to hide something, (what for?) I think we should use what we do have (memory numbers) to at least see if this is a 256-bit card or not.

Infineon memory link HYB18T256161AF-25

It says right in the article that this is a 128-bit card. These are low-end cards, they only come in 64 or 128-bit versions.

Looking for some way to discredit the benchmarks, are we?

I'm willing to be its 256bit addressing internally and 128bit externally.
 
Originally posted by: Sc4freak
I find 2900 in '05 hard to believe.

4pp 450/400... the clockspeeds don't even match a 9600XT. And that scores around 2000 in '05. Can the new architecture really boost scores by such a large amount?

yes, same idea comparing a 1.8 ghz duron vs a 1.8 ghz venice :Q
 
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Does anyone know what this means when it pertains to memory?

256Mbit DDR2 Addressing
and
16x16 addressing?

Well anyway, here is a link to the exact memory pictured in the article.
The thing is, I cant find whether it is 64,128, or 256-bit memory. Since the core numbers were blurred out for no apparent reason other than to hide something, (what for?) I think we should use what we do have (memory numbers) to at least see if this is a 256-bit card or not.

Infineon memory link HYB18T256161AF-25

It says right in the article that this is a 128-bit card. These are low-end cards, they only come in 64 or 128-bit versions.

Looking for some way to discredit the benchmarks, are we?

Actually Morphypoo, I'm looking for a way to credit them, or discredit them. Which means, if it is 256-bit memory, then it cant be a X1300 correct? If it is 128-bit or 64-bit, then it can be a X1300 correct? I know what the article says, but I also see a blurred out core. Doesn't sit well with me even if it's peachy and rosy red for you.

Luv ya. BTW: It looks like your buddy turtle got the boot after all. I knew it was intelia.

 
Originally posted by: Yanagi
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Does anyone know what this means when it pertains to memory?

256Mbit DDR2 Addressing
and
16x16 addressing?

Well anyway, here is a link to the exact memory pictured in the article.
The thing is, I cant find whether it is 64,128, or 256-bit memory. Since the core numbers were blurred out for no apparent reason other than to hide something, (what for?) I think we should use what we do have (memory numbers) to at least see if this is a 256-bit card or not.

Infineon memory link HYB18T256161AF-25

It says right in the article that this is a 128-bit card. These are low-end cards, they only come in 64 or 128-bit versions.

Looking for some way to discredit the benchmarks, are we?

I'm willing to be its 256bit addressing internally and 128bit externally.

Appreciate your input and all, but was looking for something a little more "solid".

 
Back
Top