256 mb ram $59 after rebate plus shipping

laker482

Member
Feb 2, 2001
121
0
0
Seems like a pretty good deal to me
Link

**256MB 32x64 PC133 Non-Parity Unbuffered 3.3V SDRAM-Additional $10 off from list price with rebate

theres $10 shipping fee so final price comes back to $69, still good deal though,

found on jumpondeals.com

 

rarebear

Senior member
Dec 11, 2000
450
0
71
I had a friend buy a bunch of this RAM and it ran just as fast as my Mushkin Rev2 CAS2 Hi Pro ram would not run at cas2 but just as fast..
 

SinfulWeeper

Diamond Member
Sep 2, 2000
4,567
11
81


<< I had a friend buy a bunch of this RAM and it ran just as fast as my Mushkin Rev2 CAS2 Hi Pro ram would not run at cas2 but just as fast. >>



That is not possible, take for example this.

Two 100% indentical computers, same memory, same video card, same cpu, same everything, except CAS latency. Both set to 150MHz FSB.

The computer with the CAS settings at 2-2-2 will run circles around the computer if its memory timing is set to 3-3-3. CAS3 memory in my book is buying that old s*it Dell, HP, Compaq has laying around. The only thing they are good for is... having more programs run with the added memory with no performance gain.

However at $69 I am sure this can run at 2-2-2 with a 100MHz FSB. A good deal if you ask me. Be just right for those OC'ed celery's at the right price.
 

Cherrypez

Member
Jan 10, 2001
168
0
0
Yes, this RAM works with Intel chipsets too. I bought one of these the other day before the price went up a couple bucks. :cool:

This is a hot deal for people that want a lot of RAM for cheap... Just make sure your motherboard can handle such big sticks.
 

djdh1

Junior Member
Feb 25, 2001
3
0
0
hey guys, i bought this ram and received it a few days ago and my motherboard only reads it as 128 MB only. my chipset is Intel 82443BX. can anyone resolve why it is not reaidng 256???
 

mrVW

Senior member
May 18, 2000
992
0
0
djdh1 - is it 32x4 -- older chipsets recognize these as only 128MB... just like the UpgradePlanet RAM. You have to have a newer Via or Serverworks board (haven't heard about the SiS).
 

barawn

Junior Member
Oct 20, 2000
3
0
0
Yuckysgf: CAS2 is maximally 33% faster than CAS3, but you'll never see this in real-world performance, as the system bottleneck is almost never solely the memory timings. Honestly, work out the math yourself: you have at least 2+N clock cycles per N transfers saved with CAS2 over CAS3. A single CAS2 transfer takes 4+2N clock cycles (I think! someone correct me here if I'm wrong) and a single CAS3 transfer takes 6+3N clock cycles. CAS2, then, will be maximally 50% faster (6 clock cycles vs. 9 clock cycles) over CAS3. In an infinite length transfer, CAS2 will be 33% faster than CAS3.

Bottom line: If you commonly do tasks which stress all aspects of the computer (games, office apps) then yes, CAS isn't that important - 5%, maybe 10% at best. However, if you commonly do tasks which stress the memory bus (numerical simulations, or 3D rendering on a system with huge amounts of RAM - and not displaying it to screen) then you will see a massive difference between CAS2 and CAS3. Granted - a lot of people in here don't do numerical sims or massive 3D rendering, but I just wanted to remind all of the techies out there, if you recommend a computer system to a friend who works in engineering/science fields, try to maximize the memory and cache speeds.