24% of Americans believe Secession should be legal.

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/poll-24-percent-americans-believe-states-have-right-secede

While I was disappointed that it's not an absolute majority, it's still quite a bit higher than it was just two years ago.

Rombama would turn into an Assad/Colonel Ghadafi in a heartbeat if any State tried to secede though.

I personally think that it would be better if people knew that Hitler made the same argument that Lincoln did in favor of union. That would boost the number of people who favored the right to secede, wouldn't it?

If America is to be restored, then States need to start seceding.
 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
There's no reason to secede. The same people who claim a desire to secede are the ones yelling "God Bless America" at the top of their lungs. Secession is just a large group of people having the same attitude as a spoiled child with the "I'll hold my breath until!" line.

Secession didn't work out so well last time.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,485
9,707
136
Just keep the federal government gridlocked, unable to act. Failure there will lead to states stepping up to the task of solving their own problems. Then they'll each have unique solutions and when the Feds finally get their act together to impose "comprehensive solutions' we can tell them to f' off.

No group needs to impose on another. One size solutions DO NOT fit all.
 

nehalem256

Lifer
Apr 13, 2012
15,669
8
0
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/poll-24-percent-americans-believe-states-have-right-secede

While I was disappointed that it's not an absolute majority, it's still quite a bit higher than it was just two years ago.

Rombama would turn into an Assad/Colonel Ghadafi in a heartbeat if any State tried to secede though.

I personally think that it would be better if people knew that Hitler made the same argument that Lincoln did in favor of union. That would boost the number of people who favored the right to secede, wouldn't it?

If America is to be restored, then States need to start seceding.

It seems like it would be legally complicated to secede, but I think that states should have that right.

What is the difference between Lincoln and Assad/Ghadafi. Other than that Lincoln won.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
The point Anarchist420 is that a state like say, Texas, what would it do once gone from the Union? All benefits of government the Fed provides would be gone. The world as we know it is not like it was in Civil War days, just saying Bye doesn't cut it anymore (not that it was that simple then, but it'd be far harder now).

As much as I'd like to see Fed be radically scaled back, and even dreamily wondering just how much better IL would be jettisoning off Chicago and Crook Co., it's not going to happen. Things are no where remotely close to bad enough for that to happen, and almost no Politicians/Leadership now a days have the stones to carry through with such a task.

My advice is to just not worry about it. In 100-200 years or so, we'll have Mexican rule and be so F'd as far as population density and resources scarcity goes, the problems we have today will seem truly inconsequential...

Chuck
 

Theb

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,533
9
76
Hitler and Lincoln? That'd be adorable if it wasn't so fucking stupid.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I don't think there is a clause binding states to the Union perpetually in the Constitution, but the latter has more guns. Real politik
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
A rebellion is always legal when it's our rebellion. It's only in the third person that it is illegal.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
I don't think there is a clause binding states to the Union perpetually in the Constitution, but the latter has more guns. Real politik
The word "perpetual" isn't in the U.S. Federal Constitution but it was in the u.S. Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.

The supremacy clause is an issue, as is the necessary and proper clause, but the statists will eventually lose.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,704
54,699
136
The word "perpetual" isn't in the U.S. Federal Constitution but it was in the u.S. Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.

The supremacy clause is an issue, as is the necessary and proper clause, but the statists will eventually lose.

You have a time frame for this 'eventual' loss?
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
wow, hitler reference from post 1. usually it takes a few pages...
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
You cant blame these people since the government is so huge and wastes too much money

Adjusted for population the federal government is actually smaller then since the 60s outside of defense spending. We pay less taxes also, you all are so lost in the lala land of corporate PR doublespeak its pathetic.

When will you all think for yourselves? Oh well, carry on acting a fool.
 
Last edited:

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
Do Americans really know what they want?

Everyone voted for the Iraq war because they thought they wanted that, but they changed their mind later.

This is why in marketing, you watch what people purchase not what they say they like.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Do Americans really know what they want?

Everyone voted for the Iraq war because they thought they wanted that, but they changed their mind later.

This is why in marketing, you watch what people purchase not what they say they like.

In general people were against the war and in the streets worldwide by the millions, it's the fraction of Americans who still used the USA corporate mass media as a information source that got lied to and bought into its own PR to justify the war.