Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Originally posted by: Dari
What could she be hiding?
http://politicalticker.blogs.c...ical-records/#comments
Originally posted by: techs
There are several websites dedicated to the mystery behind Palin's medical history, and they appear to raise legitimate questions about her motives for not releasing her medical records. Those who have researched her recent history are convinced that the infant with Down Syndrome which Palin has been dragging from city to city is not her child, but her daughter's first child. Her medical records would make it clear that she hasn't been pregnant in the last several years, and that's why she doesn't want them released. Palin has been aware of the controversy surrounding her pregnancy since before "Trig" was born, yet she has done NOTHING to address it satisfactorily. Her refusal to release medical records just adds credibility to these suspicions. Even if she is this infant's mother, she is guilty of exploiting the child for political gain while exposing him to the disorienting travel and extreme noise of her political campaign.
Originally posted by: Dari
What could she be hiding?
http://politicalticker.blogs.c...ical-records/#comments
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: Dari
What could she be hiding?
http://politicalticker.blogs.c...ical-records/#comments
Has Obama released his? I thought he had only gotten a 1 page letter from his doctor released? Am I wrong?
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records? The only way it would matter is if she had some terminal illness. And I really dont see McCain choosing somebody who may die before him lol
It is only of those things candidates do as a matter of courtesy.
Otherwise I have personally viewed it as meh.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
apparently she believes her medical records has something a lot of people would care about. Otherwise she would've complied and released them by now
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
apparently she believes her medical records has something a lot of people would care about. Otherwise she would've complied and released them by now
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
Originally posted by: Genx87
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
/facepalmOriginally posted by: techs
There are several websites dedicated to the mystery behind Palin's medical history, and they appear to raise legitimate questions about her motives for not releasing her medical records. Those who have researched her recent history are convinced that the infant with Down Syndrome which Palin has been dragging from city to city is not her child, but her daughter's first child. Her medical records would make it clear that she hasn't been pregnant in the last several years, and that's why she doesn't want them released. Palin has been aware of the controversy surrounding her pregnancy since before "Trig" was born, yet she has done NOTHING to address it satisfactorily. Her refusal to release medical records just adds credibility to these suspicions. Even if she is this infant's mother, she is guilty of exploiting the child for political gain while exposing him to the disorienting travel and extreme noise of her political campaign.
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
apparently she believes her medical records has something a lot of people would care about. Otherwise she would've complied and released them by now
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
She promised she'd release them two weeks ago. That time went by and not a peep. Clearly she's a liar.
So you are OK with Obama's lie about public financing, but not this one. Gotchya.Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
apparently she believes her medical records has something a lot of people would care about. Otherwise she would've complied and released them by now
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
She promised she'd release them two weeks ago. That time went by and not a peep. Clearly she's a liar.
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
everyone has their right to privacy, i'd agree with that. and honestly, i hadn't heard about this issue until this thread came up. But now Im curious as to why she hasnt disclosed when everyone else has. Also is this required, or is it something candidates are expected to disclose voluntarily? Have all candidates in previous elections disclosed their medical records?
Originally posted by: alchemize
So you are OK with Obama's lie about public financing, but not this one. Gotchya.Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Genx87
Is it really a big deal?
Are you really asking that question? Yes, of course it's a big deal. Voters need to know her medical conditions, if any, to see if she'll be inhibited from doing her job fully.
You really believe people put a whole lot of stock in medical records?
apparently she believes her medical records has something a lot of people would care about. Otherwise she would've complied and released them by now
Or she is using her right of privacy and not releasing them. You are using the same logic people use when allowing the govt to break the 4th amendment. If you have nothing to hide then why are not letting us into your home?
She promised she'd release them two weeks ago. That time went by and not a peep. Clearly she's a liar.