22" LCD & 1g 4670 or 512mb 4830

teddyv

Senior member
May 7, 2005
974
0
76
Hi Folks,

I originally started another thread trying to find a nice ~$100 card to replace my dying x800-128 and have settled on either the 4670 or 4830. I know the 4830 is faster/deeper/wider/etc. but the last question I had revolves around the 1g versus 512mb - which would be a better choice for driving an Acer AL2216WBD 22" LCD at 1680 x 1050 resolution for mostly non-gaming purposes? I am using this system currently for a lot of office work, some web dev/photoshop, some online gaming (mostly Ultima Online some WoW), and things like editing and watching video. The system is currently a 939/AMD 3000 with a monster 1g or RAM, plans to update to an e8400-based system with 4g sometime in the next month or two.

Any thoughts appreciated-

Thanks!

PS - The two cards are:
SAPPHIRE 100265L Radeon HD 4830 512MB 256-bit GDDR3
and
SAPPHIRE 100256L Radeon HD 4670 1GB 128-bit GDDR3
 

Qbah

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2005
3,754
10
81
For non gaming get what's cheaper. Also, 1GB on that HD4670 is overkill, find one with 512MB. It's like tanking V-Power 100 Racing gasoline and wearing a special suit for high speed motorbike driving and using a scooter that goes 30km/h tops downhills :p

However, if you plan on doing some gaming other than WoW (which I would strongly advise :)), spend a few more bucks for the HD4830. Well worth it over the HD4670.

But be sure not to get a card with 1GB of memory in that performance bracket.
 

error8

Diamond Member
Nov 28, 2007
3,204
0
76
For your needs, that 4830 is the choice to make. Like Qbah said, 1gb of Vram on an 4670 is a total waste. It's just a marketing scam, that fools you to pay extra money for a card that has more ram then usual, but it performs exactly the same as the stock normal card.