- Nov 10, 2003
- 17,986
- 1,388
- 126
Agree, disagree, don't care. Discuss.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/erinlarosa/things-you-didnt-know-about-in-n-out?bffb
http://www.buzzfeed.com/erinlarosa/things-you-didnt-know-about-in-n-out?bffb
11. In-N-Out has one of the lowest turnover rates in the fast food industry.
LOL that's right although INO employees are some of the best paid in fast food so it kind of figures.Something something entitled McDonalds employees something.
LOL that's right although INO employees are some of the best paid in fast food so it kind of figures.
Good point then, well playedThat exactly the point. A fast food place can pay its employees well and still be profitable and a success.
10. A manager at In-N-Out makes at least $100,000 a year.
That exactly the point. A fast food place can pay its employees well and still be profitable and a success.
Wonder how much a McD manager does.
LOL that's right although INO employees are some of the best paid in fast food so it kind of figures.
But then if everybody was paid the same as INO, it wouldn't be special and those seeking careers in FF wouldn't seek them out. There is a slippery slope about the idea of just flatly paying everyone the same. Any time value for work is artificially adjusted there are repercussions, it's common sense not a right v left issue.And yet the company still manages to make money and stay competitive. How is this possible? It flies in the face of the bullshit conservatives spew.![]()
But then if everybody was paid the same as INO, it wouldn't be special and those seeking careers in FF wouldn't seek them out. There is a slippery slope about the idea of just flatly paying everyone the same. Any time value for work is artificially adjusted there are repercussions, it's common sense not a right v left issue.
Something something entitled McDonalds employees something.
But then if everybody was paid the same as INO, it wouldn't be special and those seeking careers in FF wouldn't seek them out. There is a slippery slope about the idea of just flatly paying everyone the same. Any time value for work is artificially adjusted there are repercussions, it's common sense not a right v left issue.
In-N-Out also manufacturers real food too. They make all the fries and press all the burger patties right on premises.
McDonald's scientifically manufactures their food to resemble something of which you are familiar, including taste, smell and texture. All of their money goes to scientists and advertising agencies with very little left over for the actual food ingredient or the grunts who serve them. Poor little ole Donald's.![]()
There is no reason why other fast food retailers can't do the same thing and provide a better product and still be profitable... and, gasp, they may even make people happy and stimulate the economy.
The artificial adjustment would be forcing other chains to pay the same as INO, then it would not be set apart from the rest therefore the workers would not be as happy working at INO unless they again raised wages against their calculated value of the labor. It may surprise you which way INO leans...In-N-Out isn't artificially adjusting anything. They pay more because they want to retain good people and provide a superior product. There is no reason why other fast food retailers can't do the same thing and provide a better product and still be profitable... and, gasp, they may even make people happy and stimulate the economy.
I'm going to go to In-N-Out for lunch today and support their socialist agenda.
They should do as I did when I worked retail and the pay was not sufficient. Get a second job and quit whining.What the fuck are you talking about? Minimum wage hasn't kept pace with the price of goods. People working at McDonald's aren't trying to buy Ferraris, they're trying to pay rent.
The distribution system is more than a tad different. All Inn and Outs need to be within a days drive from a distribution center.
Yes because a chain with 290 locations is obviously an example of how a chain with 35,000 locations should work. Good luck locating a distribution center with in a single day's delivery radius of every single McDonalds on earth.
In-N-Out isn't artificially adjusting anything. They pay more because they want to retain good people and provide a superior product. There is no reason why other fast food retailers can't do the same thing and provide a better product and still be profitable... and, gasp, they may even make people happy and stimulate the economy.
I'm going to go to In-N-Out for lunch today and support their socialist agenda.
Actually you're missing the entire point. In-N-Out *chooses* quality over quantity and is still turning a profit enough to pay their workers a living wage without *any* government interference. Let that sink in for a while. Again, they are making a conscious economic choice to have that fresh vs. frozen lab experiment distribution system.
In-N-Out isn't artificially adjusting anything. They pay more because they want to retain good people and provide a superior product. There is no reason why other fast food retailers can't do the same thing and provide a better product and still be profitable... and, gasp, they may even make people happy and stimulate the economy.
I'm going to go to In-N-Out for lunch today and support their socialist agenda.
A meal at McDonalds runs at about $8-9. A meal at In-N-Out is about $5-6. Just a little note, the most expensive item at In-N-Out would be their animal style fries.
Actually you are missing the point I was making. I completely understand it is a choice that In-N-Out burger makes. However, In-N-Out should not be used as a direct example of how a large burger chain (Lets say McDonalds) can offer a higher quality product yet this is what was done. This is not to say they can't provide some better quality but to use a company of 290 stores that was built around the idea that they are all 1 day from a distribution center and then point to McDonalds or Burger King which are all over the place and say 'they can do the same thing' is absurd. There is no current way McDonalds can construct a distribution system mimic the distribution system that In-N-Out has in order to get the same quality.
Your blathering about choice and living wage has nothing to do with whether In-N-Out can be used as an example of what a company with 35,000 stores is capable of doing.
