2025 EV & self-driving news

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,542
6,634
136
Is VW really this far along???



I didn't even know they were working on a system!


1750724279312.png

1750724382234.png
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,542
6,634
136
I know what you're thinking: a used & depreciated one in about 5 years would be amazballs! :p

A lady in my town got a yellow EV bus & I REALLY like it! But 234 miles for $70k is NUTS lol. #Ecoboost4lyfe lol

The new 2026 Silverado EV Max has an absolutely massive 493-mile range, but I'm not really interested in it tbh. I liked the Cybertruck because it was so weird (crazy design, stainless steel panels, 4-wheel steering, etc.); regular-looking trucks in general aren't really all that appealing to me personally. I'd definitely go for a 500-mile VW Bus tho!! Crazy that they didn't fit a larger battery in it!
 
Dec 10, 2005
27,805
12,293
136
A lady in my town got a yellow EV bus & I REALLY like it! But 234 miles for $70k is NUTS lol. #Ecoboost4lyfe lol

The new 2026 Silverado EV Max has an absolutely massive 493-mile range, but I'm not really interested in it tbh. I liked the Cybertruck because it was so weird (crazy design, stainless steel panels, 4-wheel steering, etc.); regular-looking trucks in general aren't really all that appealing to me personally. I'd definitely go for a 500-mile VW Bus tho!! Crazy that they didn't fit a larger battery in it!
Considering that most people don't drive that far on a daily basis, 234 miles is fine. You are an extreme outlier to need such a high level of range.

And people spend all sorts of bs amounts of money on things they don't really fit their needs. Look at all the pickup trucks on the road that are just pavement princesses.
 

96Firebird

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 2010
5,738
334
126
Considering that most people don't drive that far on a daily basis, 234 miles is fine. You are an extreme outlier to need such a high level of range.

However, that bigger battery also (presumably) equates to further distance while towing/hauling. I think this is where the real win of the "long range" truck is.

Edit - After looking at the electrek article, I don't understand the pricing.

478mi LT Max is $91,295, while the 478mi Trail Boss Max is $88,695?

Also, +$16k-$20k for 68 miles more of range?

Edit2 - Looks like the numbers are messed up in the chart for the LT Extended/Max MSRP, as the paragraph below it says $68,95 and $76,295 respectively.
 
Last edited:
Dec 10, 2005
27,805
12,293
136
However, that bigger battery also (presumably) equates to further distance while towing/hauling. I think this is where the real win of the "long range" truck is.

Edit - After looking at the electrek article, I don't understand the pricing.

478mi LT Max is $91,295, while the 478mi Trail Boss Max is $88,695?

Also, +$16k-$20k for 68 miles more of range?

Edit2 - Looks like the numbers are messed up in the chart for the LT Extended/Max MSRP, as the paragraph below it says $68,95 and $76,295 respectively.
Yes, longer hauling, but that's almost certainly a niche thing for most truck buyers. There are also diminishing returns to stacking more heavy batteries into a vehicle to extend range.

It's just a relatively crazy thing that people complain about vehicle prices, range, and towing capabilities when they aren't using the range or bed space more than once a year. Financially speaking, they'd be better off buying a cheaper and lighter vehicle, and using the money saved to just renting or pa for delivery for the rare times they need something different.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,542
6,634
136
Yes, longer hauling, but that's almost certainly a niche thing for most truck buyers. There are also diminishing returns to stacking more heavy batteries into a vehicle to extend range.

It's just a relatively crazy thing that people complain about vehicle prices, range, and towing capabilities when they aren't using the range or bed space more than once a year. Financially speaking, they'd be better off buying a cheaper and lighter vehicle, and using the money saved to just renting or pa for delivery for the rare times they need something different.

That's my take too:

The average round-trip commute in the U.S. is about 40 miles.

1. Buy a cheap EV
2. Rent an ICE for trips (car, truck, RV)

I was excited about the prospect of the Cybertruck. I wanted the 500-mile version for work & my wife was going to get to get the base. $39k with a bed was a bonkers deal for how little maintenance would be required!

The estimated maintenance cost for a Tesla Cybertruck over 5 years is $1,986.

As both turned out to be vaporware (among other issues lol), we switched to a 240-mile Slate EV for her & I'm sticking with #EcoboostPowa for now lol. There are a LOT of options in the 400+ mile range now tho!

1750884332606.png

1750884399510.png

1750884472312.png
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,542
6,634
136
Tesla Robotaxi command center:

* View the live cameras of the Teslas
* See all the rides
* Monitor the weather
* etc.

If they can crack this code, their profits will be CRAZY due to the vertical integration...build the cars, the FSD software, build the fuel network, the AI, and the taxi service...

1751122446365.png

 
  • Like
Reactions: Brovane

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,542
6,634
136
‘Lidar is lame’: why Elon Musk’s vision for a self-driving Tesla taxi faltered:


My thoughts:

1. Tesla Autopilot is fantastic for what is is
2. However, for progress towards FSD, there are simply hardware limitations with using a vision-only system
3. Curious about how Cybertaxis are going to handle bad whether & how remote operators are going to take over if they can't see...

Musk’s insistence on camera-only technology has landed Tesla in hot water over fatal crashes involving drivers using the full self-driving feature. The company is now the focus of government investigations and civil lawsuits, which allege that full self-driving is impeded by weather conditions such as sun glare, fog, dust and darkness. There have been at least 736 crashes and 17 deaths involving the technology, according to an analysis by the Washington Post.

“Tesla continues to have this fetishistic view that it’s going to operate its system solely on cameras, despite every intelligent human being in this entire space saying that can’t be done,” said Brett Schreiber, an attorney who represents several alleged victims of Tesla’s autopilot failures.

“Everyone who has been following collision-avoidant technology since the 90s knows that the holy trinity is radar, lidar and cameras.

Schreiber said he was not surprised to see the wobbling rollout of Tesla’s robotaxis in Austin.

“What you’re also going to see, which is the true tragedy of this thing, is people continuing to be injured and killed by this technology,” he said. “And that’s where it becomes less of a ‘Oh, isn’t that cute? The vehicle can’t make a left’ to now we’re actually at someone’s funeral because of the choices Tesla makes.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brovane