• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2020 john stossel: weyco fire employees for smoking

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Velk
Whether they are equivalent depends on the circumstance - I'd suggest that there will be many cases where the sporting cover will cost more than the extra premiums a casual smoker suffers.

In other words, you have no clue. That doesn't prevent you from posting nonsense, though.
 
Originally posted by: fornax
Originally posted by: Velk
Whether they are equivalent depends on the circumstance - I'd suggest that there will be many cases where the sporting cover will cost more than the extra premiums a casual smoker suffers.

In other words, you have no clue. That doesn't prevent you from posting nonsense, though.

He has an opinion and you have an opinion. That doesn't make his opinion nonsense. I happen to agree with Velk. How is one high risk activity any different then another high risk activity? If one has to pay a higher health premium then so should the other.

How much longer will it before insurance costs go up enough that employers will want to raise premiums on other groups, such as people with family history of cancer, mental illinois, etc.?

What is the advantage of a group insurance policy if they are going to divide it into groups????
 
Back
Top