• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2016 Republican Primary Candidates

That's okay, and I understand the sentiment... welcome to the thread. 🙂

13 men enter Thunderdome, 1 man leaves. 🙂

-John
 
95dbd479e3fc7cbeb560995801947436.jpg
 
john, serious question.

why didn't anyone take ron paul seriously?
Serious answer. I'm taking him seriously.

One of the biggest failures we as a nation have made is electing democratic (as it is known today... socialist/communist) candidates.

Government is run amock, and we need someone who will stop the absurdity.

Rand Paul, can and will do that.

-John
 
Way too early to tell... and you realize, that if we are in last place, that means Hillary Clinton won.

<- Shivers

-John
 
Not only is she running, but she is flaunting a 2 Billion Dollar War Chest.

It's inconceivable to me that anyone could vote for her.

Likewise, Jeb Bush, is running a $1 Billion war chest.

I won't vote for him. I am done with the Bushes, as I have been done with the Clinton's for a long time.

I'm hoping someone beats Jeb Bush, and that is who I will vote for in our two party system.

I won't vote if it is Hillary and Jeb.

-John
 
ok, I'll play.
So, at this point we have 13 potential nominees. Of the 13, who do you really believe
1) deserves the nomination and why
2) will be the first to drop and why
3) who will actually win the nomination and why
4) will there be a surprise dark horse candidate (like Bernie Sanders is turning into)
5) If Rand Paul is not nominated do you think he will run as an independent?

There you go, 5 civil, simple questions about your party.
 
Not only is she running, but she is flaunting a 2 Billion Dollar War Chest.

It's inconceivable to me that anyone could vote for her.

Likewise, Jeb Bush, is running a $1 Billion war chest.

I won't vote for him. I am done with the Bushes, as I have been done with the Clinton's for a long time.

I'm hoping someone beats Jeb Bush, and that is who I will vote for in our two party system.

I won't vote if it is Hillary and Jeb.

-John

That is exactly why I think this election signals the death of the two party system. Rhetoric aside, those who do vote, will vote, which may finally lead to re examining the Electoral College.
 
That's what the thread is about, is exploring Republican candidat4es, without them being labeled a freak show.

So far I know I am not voting for a Bush, and would like to see Rand Paul get some of the enthusiasm that Bernie Sanders is getting.

If Hillary is elected, I will pretty much be decimated, and lose all hope in America.

-John
 
That is exactly why I think this election signals the death of the two party system. Rhetoric aside, those who do vote, will vote, which may finally lead to re examining the Electoral College.
I see your point. There was a time when we could vote for someone who represents our ideas and ideals in Government. Today, each alternative is equally bad.

-John
 
Your saying their support, will be bad?

I'm okay with Jeb Bush, failing.

-John

They're so toxic, their support guarantees anyone a loss. Lincoln wouldn't have got elected if he'd had their support. The fact that more than a handful of Republicans take them seriously makes me shudder way more than the possibility that Hillary could be elected.
 
Because they are religous?

You do know that Hillary and Obama go to church every Sunday?

-John

Because they are loudmouth posturing bad mannered children who spout hate, prejudice and, economic stupidity. They are an embarrassment not seen since John Birch only the great communist conspiracy has been replaced by minorities, immigrants and, the poor.
 
Back
Top