Doubt Sam really deserved to be picked so late.. I'll be rooting for him..
I am tired of the, "Sam should have been drafted much higher" garbage. I am sure we are going to hear this for a couple years, especially if the press doesn't feel he is getting a fair shake.
What are people basing the belief that he should have been drafted higher on?
I have seen nothing to defend this position other than a) he was a DPOY in the SEC and b) a draft guru gave him a 3-5 round "grade."
Anyone who knows college/NFL football knows neither of these mean anything in projecting how a player will do in the NFL and whether they would be, or even should be, drafted (see: multiple players projected to be 1st rounders did not get drafted over the last couple years). The fact he had 4 UDFA offers and WAS drafted indicated teams were willing to take him on so if he had perceived value he would have been drafted sooner. If he was a 3rd round talent one of those 5 teams would have taken him long before the very end of the 7th round as that is a 4 round slide. If you are the other 4 teams you don't let a 3rd round graded player literally slide out of the draft if you value him at the third round. You grab him in the 6th or 7th. Oh wait, other 3rd round grades slip into the 7th too? Well, that is why good players go undrafted. But if you really wanted him you shop your 2015 6th for a 2014 7th. If teams value him he would have gone higher.
I know most in the press and even more fans are not familiar with the draft. They think great college player = high draft pick. Tell that to all those great college QBs who are passed over every season--look at those SEC guys with great college careers and solid size not taken in the first 3 rounds. Or all the elite running backs dropping into the second and later rounds. The NFL drafts based on projection, value, and need.
Michael Sam did have a good senior season. 48 tackles (31 solo), 19 for a loss, and 11.5 sacks. 2 pass deflections and 2 forced fumbles. This performance was good enough for a 2013 1st Team
All-American, Co-SEC
Defensive Player of the Year, and
Bronko Nagurski Trophy finalist. That is a great season.
So why were people down on Sam? Because Michael Sam's combine is not very good. He is 6'2" (not very tall and not a lot of space to add bulk) but to his benefit has long arms (33" 3/8). He is small for a "big" DE at 261lbs but lacks the explosion for a "smaller" pass rushing end or 3-4 OLB. He is slow (4.91 40,) lacks explosion (25.5" verticle, 114" broad jump), and lacks quickness (7.8 3 cone drill, 4.7 shuttle). He also lacks strength (17 rep bench).
He does not project well into the NFL.
That doesn't mean he won't be good. There are a LOT of great players who either played poorly in college or did not project well. Look at Seattle's roster. But also note that players like Sherman, Smith, Maxwell, Wilson, etc. usually had something going for them (e.g. Sherman's height, intelligence, solid speed for a tall player, very good jumping ability, and his college performance is lacking as he played WR his first couple years so he was still developing. Malcom Smith is very fast, Wilson has everything a QB needs except height, etc.)
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/michael-sam-1.html
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/michael-sam?id=2543734
Still don't believe me that Michael Sam was not a shoe in mid round draft pick? I have one name for you in this draft:
Jackson Jeffcoat
Jeffcoat was
NOT drafted. Seattle just picked him up as a UDFA. If you look at the stats, awards, and Combine metrics it is clear to me that Jeffcoat has a much, much higher upside than Sam. Especially if Jeffcoat can find a team willing to tutor him at a pass rushing DE position or pass rushing OLB in a 3-4. He not only has better metrics, other than weight, than Michael Sam but his metrics put him in the upper tier of athletes
in the NFL.
Jeffcoat has good length (6'3" with 33"7/8 arms) and is a SPARQ freak. At the combine he posted a 4.63 40, 36" vertical, 123" broad jump, 6.97 3 cone drill, 4.18 shuttle, and 25 reps. Jeffcoat played DE his senior season but also played OLB the previous year so he has some versatility. Just compare the side-by-side metrics:
Jeffcoat vs. Sam
40: 4.63 vs. 4.91
Vert: 36" vs. 25.5"
Broad Jump: 123" vs. 114"
3 Cone: 6.97 vs. 7.80
Shuttle: 4.18 vs. 4.70
Bench: 25 vs. 17
Height: 6'3" vs. 6'2"
Weight: 247 vs. 261
Jeffcoat blows Sam away. The major flag on Jeffcoat is he is on light side at 247lbs. So he either needs to bulk up (14lbs would put him up with Sam--and there is little doubt at 261 Jeffcoat is still much quicker and explosive) or a team is going to have to work him into a pass rushing DE or OLB.
So the only argument for Sam going mucher higher in the draft while Jeffcoat being fairly undrafted would be Sam was a better college talent. But this doesn't appear to be true when looking at their stats or game tape. Jeffcoat played DE at Texas and had a productive senior year with 82 tackles (40 solo, 42 assists, only FBS d-lineman to lead his team in tackles), 19 for loss, 2 forced fumbles, and 13 sacks. This performance was good enough for a 2013 1st Team
All-American, Co-Big 12
Defensive Player of the Year, and
Ted Hendricks Award winner (i.e. award for nations best defensive end in terms of on and off field contribution). Jackson Jeffcoat also has NFL blood as his dad, Jim Jeffcoat, won 2 Super Bowls with Dallas.
Outside of 14 pounds Jeffcoat is able to match or exceed Michael Same in metrics, statistics, and awards. They are both 1st team All-Americans with Co-DPoY honors. Jeffcoat had about 2x as many tackles and a slight edge in sacks. Based on the above if I presented both players on two score sheet, neither with a name, and said 1 player, based on the stats and combine alone, was drafted in the 7th round and 1 player was undrafted you would have selected the score sheet with Jeffcoat's data. There is no way you say Sam was selected and Jeffcoat was not.
And again, Jeffcoat was NOT drafted. The Rams valued Same as a draft pick. No one valued Jeffcoat. Them the breaks as they say.
All that said, I would love to hear how Michael Sam should have been a 3rd round pick. I am looking at all the great talent that slid past the 3rd round (especially receivers) and I have a hard time seeing how an undersized and slow DE should have gone sooner. I am actually surprised he went before Jeffcoat as at least Jeffcoat has some metrics that could translate to a situation player (i.e. nickel pass rusher).
But I have read nothing to justify why Michael Sam is a 3rd-5th round talent other than those who want to use prime exposure (the NFL) to stir the pot and use the media attention to further their agenda. Which is VERY unfair to players like Jackson Jeffcoat. It also isn't fair to Sam if his prime desire is to play and succeed in the NFL. Look at the Tim Tebow circus. It KILLED his career. I hope Sam, now that he is on the team and the NFL reprimanding slurs (see: Jones in Miami getting fined this weekend) he asks the media to give him space and be an NFL player. It will be VERY hard for him to make the Ram's team as they are stacked on the D-line and 7th rounders get cut all the time. He needs his focus and time on making the team.
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/jackson-jeffcoat?id=2543660
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1737095/jackson-jeffcoat
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jackson-jeffcoat-1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Hendricks_Award