2009 NBA Finals

Page 93 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Flipped Gazelle

Diamond Member
Sep 5, 2004
6,666
3
81
Originally posted by: OCguy
So what is more likely? The Lakers losing 2 in a row, or the Cavs winning 3 in a row?


It hurts me to say this, but I think it is more likely that the Lakers blow this.

IMO, it's more likely the Cavs win 3 in a throw than the Lakers lose out to the Nugs.

If the Magic go cold from 3-pt land, the Cavs can beat them.

It's really looking like an Orlando-LA Finals.
 

puffff

Platinum Member
Jun 25, 2004
2,374
0
0
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
All the starters took between 7-13 shots. Odom took 15.
The Nuggets were 39% from the field, 77% FTs (LA was slightly worse), and 30% from the arc (LA was way worse). Despite the poor shooting from the floor by Denver, LA still only won by 9 and the score separation didn't come until the 4th quarter. Kobe shot below 50% from the field, was 1-6 from three, and had 7 Tos.

It was a win by LA but it definitely was not a pretty win. Any win is a good win though.

Kobe was only one shot under 50% - he shot 6/13. And 22 pts on 13 shots is super efficient, plus has to make his teammates feel good. Again, his impact went way beyond statistics. I'm not even a Kobe "guy", but he truly played a wonderful game.

I agree there was some sloppiness., but Phil Jackson has much to be pleased with. Time to get Odom some more candy!

[/quote]

Studying box scores is fun as hell, especially when playing fantasy, but to get a real sense of whether a player is shooting well, you gotta watch the game. A couple last second heaves at the end of a shot clock or quarter can really skew someone's shooting percentage. As would a hustle play where a player crashes the offensive board, manages to get a tip or two at the basket, but misses. Because regardless there was a real chance of those going in, those count as shot attempts too.

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: puffff
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The Nuggets were 39% from the field, 77% FTs (LA was slightly worse), and 30% from the arc (LA was way worse). Despite the poor shooting from the floor by Denver, LA still only won by 9 and the score separation didn't come until the 4th quarter. Kobe shot below 50% from the field, was 1-6 from three, and had 7 Tos.

It was a win by LA but it definitely was not a pretty win. Any win is a good win though.

Kobe was only one shot under 50% - he shot 6/13. And 22 pts on 13 shots is super efficient, plus has to make his teammates feel good. Again, his impact went way beyond statistics. I'm not even a Kobe "guy", but he truly played a wonderful game.

I agree there was some sloppiness., but Phil Jackson has much to be pleased with. Time to get Odom some more candy!

Studying box scores is fun as hell, especially when playing fantasy, but to get a real sense of whether a player is shooting well, you gotta watch the game. A couple last second heaves at the end of a shot clock or quarter can really skew someone's shooting percentage. As would a hustle play where a player crashes the offensive board, manages to get a tip or two at the basket, but misses. Because regardless there was a real chance of those going in, those count as shot attempts too.
I haven't missed watching a 2nd round or conference finals game yet.

My statement comes from knowing what LA (and Kobe) is capable of compared to the game they played last night. In contrast to that consideration they played decently, but nowhere near great. It certainly wasn't anywhere near their best effort and there was a lot of sloppiness on both sides. Fortunately for LA, Denver played a lot sloppier than they did.

Note that I am not a Denver or LA fan either. I'm simply making a neutral observation as someone who has played lots of basketball and has been a fan of the NBA since the mid-1960s.

That said -- Go Magic.

Edit: fixed nested quotes.
 

herkulease

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2001
3,923
0
0
anyhow I made some candy references to Lamar Odom and TLC did too.

If you're wondering where it came from and didn't see the pregame stuff from yesterday on ABC

here's the Video

Too bad the ESPN/NBA doesn't do more of these types of things.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Go GO Go Magic!

Cleveland is currently laying the smackdown, 34-12 in 1st Qtr.

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!

After 4 games they finally decide to play well but of course it's at home they decided to play well. We'll really see what they're made of when they go back to Orlando. If they really have turned it on then they should be able to do it on the road.

But it looks like the Cavs are letting the Magic get a run in so who knows what'll happen tonight.
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Go GO Go Magic!

Cleveland is currently laying the smackdown, 34-12 in 1st Qtr.

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!

After 4 games they finally decide to play well but of course it's at home they decided to play well. We'll really see what they're made of when they go back to Orlando. If they really have turned it on then they should be able to do it on the road.

But it looks like the Cavs are letting the Magic get a run in so who knows what'll happen tonight.

FYI, Cavs did that the first 2 games.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Originally posted by: Onita
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Go GO Go Magic!

Cleveland is currently laying the smackdown, 34-12 in 1st Qtr.

FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!

After 4 games they finally decide to play well but of course it's at home they decided to play well. We'll really see what they're made of when they go back to Orlando. If they really have turned it on then they should be able to do it on the road.

But it looks like the Cavs are letting the Magic get a run in so who knows what'll happen tonight.

FYI, Cavs did that the first 2 games.

Well yea but every game is different so who knows. Magic could easily get any double digit down quickly with their 3pt shooting. Who knows but it's back to double digits now. I want another good/close game.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
WOW good job Cavs letting the Magic get back within one. Hmm maybe this is going to be a replay of the other games.
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
This is looking like some previous games where Cleveland came out strong and still lost. If it holds true to form it'll come right down to the wire as well.
 

jinduy

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
4,781
1
81
Stan Van Gundy's coaching is unconventional. The players don't play well until they feel intense pressure.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
A few years ago, wasn't the NBA making noises about calling a personal foul for flopping?

Heh. It's like tort reform for basketball. But I don't know how it ever could be reasonably enacted. Maybe you could make an example out of a few players to set a precident. But I just don't see any objective way to continue it.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,637
6,521
126
what happened with williams? i had to do something and came back and he was walking to the lockerroom stripping.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Originally posted by: Flipped Gazelle
A few years ago, wasn't the NBA making noises about calling a personal foul for flopping?

Euro's/South Americans are just too good at it.