LordSnailz
Diamond Member
blah, it's actually not that bad ... it's different but not aztec different.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
I call BS on Mitsu still being around for the 06 model year. 😉
- M4H
Originally posted by: NFS4
Front shot
Originally posted by: wicktron
yuck, doesn't appeal to me.
and it's a mitsubishi... double yuck!
Meh...this is good newsOriginally posted by: NFS4
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=1772100
but that design is less than sexy...or original265 horses that I?m guessing will be mighty impressive. The GT will have a choice of a sic (sic) speed....
You mean like how they used to in the DSM glory days from 89-99? I could only wish...Originally posted by: SuperTool
Why don't they build it on the lancer evo platform with same engine? And have a cheaper version with another engine.
It doesn't take personal experience to know that the big-V6-front-heavy FWD Eclipse is gonna plow through every turn. While the light-and-balanced Type R 'Teg is one of the best handling FWD cars ever built.Originally posted by: sniperruff
and how would you know that? did you actually drive both on a race track?Originally posted by: NutBucket
You're comparing apples to oranges. The 'teg would eat it for lunch around a technical course.Originally posted by: sniperruff
POS or not, a 03' GTS SPYDER is as fast as a 97' integra type R...Originally posted by: CraigRT
anything would look better than that current POS Eclipse...
2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS Spyder 15.2@93.0 3.0 V6 210 5-Speed MT 4/02
1997 Acura Integra Type R 15.2 1.8 I4 190 5-Speed -
link