Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Better interior?? It's nothing but a bunch of plastic and little Chicklet sized buttons.
I like it that way. Personal peference.
Don't get me wrong, the 9-3 is good looking car, but for the money they're asking for it, it should at least have AWD and some more horsepower. Otherwise, it will always be a minor player in this segment.
Well, looking at the Canadian Prices...it's not that bad.
The 9-3 Vector is $43k CDN, that's a pretty good price. Cheaper than a 3-series and roughly same price as a fully loaded G35. And the entire 9-3 model ranges from 35K to $43k CDN, which isn't bad. A Maxima starts off at 36K and a fully loaded Accord is around $40K.
Plus, you add in GM's awesome financing deals and discounts -- it makes it a very good deal.
Bah, Candian's have screwed up overblown pricing. Your auto market SUCKS!
😛
No, we just invalidated your argument on SAAB's pricing.
😛
Hey, don't blame us for cheap cars, just because we are poor.
Invalidate what?
The fact that a Vector has a base price of $32,500 leads me to believe that GM isn't thinking realistically here, especially when you can get a fully loaded front-wheel drive TSX for under $29,000. Sure, you can throw in all the discounts and financing, but you're still paying more for a car that really isn't worth it.
Would I pay $28,000 (after let's say a $4,500 GM discount) for a $32,500 Saab 9-3 Vector?? Hell no, b/c in my opinion it should have been $28,000 to begin with.
The point is, in this crowded field of near-luxury cars, there are a wealth of competitors. Given the 9-3's price, power (or lack thereof...0-60 in 8.3 seconds with a 6-speed manual) and feature list, it just doesn't add up. There are MANY better vehicles in this segment and a mediocre player with an inflated price isn't gonna win any new customers.