$2000 for a Flatscreen TV a waste?

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: sunase
Amusing comparing this thread to http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx?catid=38&threadid=1893404 . Where are all the "it's wrong to criticize" replies?

Because Philippine Mango is a douche? Or everybody hates him? I dunno, I don't mind him but thats the general trend on this forum.

 

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: MrChad

Originally posted by: goku
To be honest, I'm not angsty, I'm just board stiff.

:Q TMI!

Hope you're jokin

 

[raptor13]

No.


Edit: I can't link. 🙁

 

[jagec]

Well, I bought a very nice car for $2100, which has been endless fun in ways that a TV never could be, so to each his own I guess.

 

[NaOH]

Buy whatever you want.

/thread

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

:roll:

Not true that flat on a woman is bad.

If you feel it is, i'm sorry for you.

 

[Rubycon]

Originally posted by: n7

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

:roll:

Not true that flat on a woman is bad.

If you feel it is, i'm sorry for you.

Oh for crying out loud get a grip on LIFE and get some humor. And probably some balls because you must not have any. 😛

 

[Kelemvor]

I'd get a projector for less and then you can have as big of a picture as you want.

 

[imported_goku]

Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
I'd get a projector for less and then you can have as big of a picture as you want.

Prob is, they run hot and, need a dark room due to the weak bulb.

 

[n7]

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Oh for crying out loud get a grip on LIFE and get some humor. And probably some balls because you must not have any. 😛

You need to add teh correct smiley so it's more obvious your comment was meant to be sarcastic, not serious.
:laugh: or 😉 or 😛, for example.

As for balls, if me finding some flatter-chested women attractive make me not have any, then so be it 😉

 

[0roo0roo]

well for one you should tell her a 26" crt cheap tv will not really be hdtv no matter what the label. its more like dvd+ resolution😛 doesn't have the dot pitch to resolve anywhere that resolution. but u know how it is with marketing, if the beam scans 1080 times its "hdtv" regardless if it results in any visible detail heh

 

[Midlander]

Originally posted by: Blazin Trav

Originally posted by: MS Dawn
Funny how flat on a woman is bad yet on a TV...

please use :camera: in your posts so i can read it

Fixed