• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

News 20% of Americans believe microchips are inside COVID-19 vaccines

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
They said that with a straight face yet carry a device in their pocket and probably their wrist that is capable of tracking and recording everything they do... I've long championed for better mental health programs in this country for many reasons, this doesn't touch the tip of the iceberg in regards to that.
 
What kind of microchips are they supposedly using?
Most vaccines use something like 22-25 gauge needles ... thats like .3-.4mm at the biggest.

Im sure some RFID chips are that size (like what we can put in our pets), but, anything with a radio/transmitter is likely going to be physically impossible to fit into a syringe.

Besides, cell phones are MUCH better for tracking people since they can record sound and video and have GPS. The government already uses mobile phones to track people, what is the purpose of trying to implant a chip?
 
Glad I passed on getting the Pfizer vaccine because of the chips in them. I've read that this is why the Delta variant is spreading so fast.
It gets around the microchips in the vaccines so that is why is can spread faster.
 
Because
1.) Internet Poll.
2.) People love to Troll these polls.
3.) I don't think that many people are that stupid.
Citation?

And really? You think people are really smarter than that? Let's find a few comparison examples for specifically the moon landing, just to use as a tuning fork for this specific poll. Remember, we're looking for somewhere around 12%.
2019, 11% believe, 11% use the option of 'neither strongly agree or disagree' (that choice wasn't available in the one here)

2013, 7% believe.

2009, 6% believe.

Apparently in 1999, around 11%... after Fox aired a conspiracy theory 'documentary', it jumped briefly to 20%... glad to see they were in the misinformation game so tightly back then too. Shitfucks.

1995, 6% believe, 11% no opinion.

So basically, from the time we started polling such nonsense until around 2013, it was consistently 6-7%, with a fairly large percentage that 'had no opinion' if given the option (which is absurd). After that, the conspiracy engine of the internet was able to take over, and morons are easy marks for such things. I'm sure the percentages of believers of all major conspiracy theories is up.
 
Citation?

And really? You think people are really smarter than that? Let's find a few comparison examples for specifically the moon landing, just to use as a tuning fork for this specific poll. Remember, we're looking for somewhere around 12%.
2019, 11% believe, 11% use the option of 'neither strongly agree or disagree' (that choice wasn't available in the one here)

2013, 7% believe.

2009, 6% believe.

Apparently in 1999, around 11%... after Fox aired a conspiracy theory 'documentary', it jumped briefly to 20%... glad to see they were in the misinformation game so tightly back then too. Shitfucks.

1995, 6% believe, 11% no opinion.

So basically, from the time we started polling such nonsense until around 2013, it was consistently 6-7%, with a fairly large percentage that 'had no opinion' if given the option (which is absurd). After that, the conspiracy engine of the internet was able to take over, and morons are easy marks for such things. I'm sure the percentages of believers of all major conspiracy theories is up.


Again, though, you can never tell with polls whether people are being sincere in their answers, because nothing is really at stake for them. Maybe a lot of people are crazy or dumb (the Capitol assault, and the last couple of elections, seems to confirm that at least some are, because those involved real stakes and real concequences) but I don't think one can assume everyone answering those sorts of polls truly believes the box they tick.
 
Again, though, you can never tell with polls whether people are being sincere in their answers, because nothing is really at stake for them. Maybe a lot of people are crazy or dumb (the Capitol assault, and the last couple of elections, seems to confirm that at least some are, because those involved real stakes and real concequences) but I don't think one can assume everyone answering those sorts of polls truly believes the box they tick.
Then they also have no reason to lie. Just because we don't like the answer doesn't mean it's wrong.
 
Then they also have no reason to lie. Just because we don't like the answer doesn't mean it's wrong.

People have all sorts of reasons to lie in such things - a sense of mischief, or a desire to amuse themselves (which we'd now call 'trolling' I guess) being one.

I don't know that I'd lie in a political-type opinion poll, but it's sometimes occurred to me that if I ever end up taking part in a social-pscyhology experiment I'll deliberately give answers and choose behaviours that screw with their experiment (because I don't like psychology as an academic discipline, I think it has dismally-low standards and gets used for ideological purposes - one thing that strikes me as an obvious weakness in many such experiments I've heard about, is that the stakes for the participants are always so low...the 'rewards' involved in things like testing how co-operative or selfish or altruisitc people are are always very small, so for me they would be outweighed by the 'reward' of getting to screw with psychologists).
 
People have all sorts of reasons to lie in such things - a sense of mischief, or a desire to amuse themselves (which we'd now call 'trolling' I guess) being one.

I don't know that I'd lie in a political-type opinion poll, but it's sometimes occurred to me that if I ever end up taking part in a social-pscyhology experiment I'll deliberately give answers and choose behaviours that screw with their experiment (because I don't like psychology as an academic discipline, I think it has dismally-low standards and gets used for ideological purposes - one thing that strikes me as an obvious weakness in many such experiments I've heard about, is that the stakes for the participants are always so low...the 'rewards' involved in things like testing how co-operative or selfish or altruisitc people are are always very small, so for me they would be outweighed by the 'reward' of getting to screw with psychologists).
Then you'd be noise on the final tally, which is expected and accounted for with error bars. It also barely moves the needle, as most people aren't quite so sociopathic regarding other peoples' work.

Sure, it's not as precise as math, but neither is the human brain. The science is fuzzy because the subject is fuzzy, but that doesn't make the results wrong.
 
Then you'd be noise on the final tally, which is expected and accounted for with error bars. It also barely moves the needle, as most people aren't quite so sociopathic regarding other peoples' work.

Sure, it's not as precise as math, but neither is the human brain. The science is fuzzy because the subject is fuzzy, but that doesn't make the results wrong.

Nah, it's dismal. As an academic discipline it has a startlingly high incidence of outright academic fraud, and its track record for reproducability is poor. It's built on very questionable philosophical foundations, in my opinion. I'd scrap it entirely as a discipline until we are able to do it properly. As things stand its largely driven by ideology.
 
Maybe A lot of people are crazy AND dumb (the Capitol assault, and the last couple of elections, seems to 100% confirm'S that at least some NEARLY HALF OF AMERICAN VOTERS are JUST PLAIN STUPID.


Ftfy. 😉

😳

*(being proved wrong here would be AWESOME btw... after 2020 though....)
 
Last edited:
I mean, it seems similar to the way it may not in fact be true that the Jedi religion went into a serious decline between 2001 and 2011.




I mean, there were a couple of poor Star Wars movies that came out during that time period (the 'prequels', I think), but is it really likely such a major world faith could decline so dramatically in just ten years? Seems implausible.


Also...


People don't always tell the truth in opinion polls and surveys, I think.
IDK, I've known some heavy metal fans that could probably legitimately consider it their religion.
 
I've been writing user-facing software long enough to believe in the power of human stupidity.


You underestimate this factor at your peril .... it is truly boundless. 😕


OzMAQpm.jpeg



I can certainly see the attraction! 😀
 
Ah, you have just exposed your own intellectual mortality. 😉

Hoax.


The fact that you had to check however sorta proves my point. (also its a very good idea to check out anything that anyone tells you)

Would you even have been more than mildly surprised had it turned out to be real though? Be honest!

😛
 
The fact that you had to check however sorta proves my point. (also its a very good idea to check out anything that anyone tells you)

Would you even have been more than mildly surprised had it turned out to be real though? Be honest!

😛
It seems a bit farfetched and it would take the willpower of a prisoner of war to actually get hard while the stings start before it could ever be put in the hole.

I never saw, but I think a bee or wasp got me once but I didn't see it. The piercing pain is hard hitting.
 
It seems a bit farfetched and it would take the willpower of a prisoner of war to actually get hard while the stings start before it could ever be put in the hole.

I never saw, but I think a bee or wasp got me once but I didn't see it. The piercing pain is hard hitting.


I WOULD imagine it takes some serious willpower to "maintain" your manliness with a dozen hornets digging in!

😛 😱

maxresdefault.jpg


*(I suspect I'd be running and screaming!)
 
Back
Top