- Jan 13, 2004
- 4,294
- 0
- 76
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Nice, passively cooled.
That shows that nvidia just went above and beyond and put a nice cooler on their 6800U designs, while ATI skimped and put that dinky little crap on theirs..
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Nice, passively cooled.
That shows that nvidia just went above and beyond and put a nice cooler on their 6800U designs, while ATI skimped and put that dinky little crap on theirs..
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Nice, passively cooled.
That shows that nvidia just went above and beyond and put a nice cooler on their 6800U designs, while ATI skimped and put that dinky little crap on theirs..
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Anyway, I like how nVidia boardmakers seem to use a lot more imagination than ATI boardmakers and actually give buyers some choice.
$412?? What is Asus thinking? You can get a GT for less than that.Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Anyway, I like how nVidia boardmakers seem to use a lot more imagination than ATI boardmakers and actually give buyers some choice.
Originally posted by: quikah
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Anyway, I like how nVidia boardmakers seem to use a lot more imagination than ATI boardmakers and actually give buyers some choice.
Hmm it is $412, why would you want this over the $399 GT?
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
We couldn't even get past the first post could we.....
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
umm, dont all 6800s use GDDR?
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
We couldn't even get past the first post could we.....
I wonder if Asus botched their naming? Because the v9999's clockspeed matches the 6800GT's.Originally posted by: quikah
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Anyway, I like how nVidia boardmakers seem to use a lot more imagination than ATI boardmakers and actually give buyers some choice.
Hmm it is $412, why would you want this over the $399 GT?
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
I wonder if Asus botched their naming? Because the v9999's clockspeed matches the 6800GT's.Originally posted by: quikah
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, didn't you mean for that second link to be to an Asus V9999?
1GHz GDDR3 instead of 700 MHzDDR
Anyway, I like how nVidia boardmakers seem to use a lot more imagination than ATI boardmakers and actually give buyers some choice.
Hmm it is $412, why would you want this over the $399 GT?
Originally posted by: virtualgames0
Yeah I just felt like trolling
But really, the people that says nvidia has a hot and power hungry design pisses me off, because nvidia went above and beyond to put a nice cooler on there, and they get bashed for it.
I know because my 9800Pro was FAR less resistant to my hot case temps in so. cali weather than my 5900.