• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

2 *new* ipod pics

A 40GB ipod as thin as the nano? :Q

Call me silly but I like the thicker ipods. The 60GB is perfect. Making it thinner without reducing the overall size doesn't seem right. I mean we all know one day that we'll be wearing wristwatches with 500GB and some kind of xtooth radio that communicates at god knows what speed to an earpiece or (ugh) a chip inside the head. As long as it still tells time it's ok. 🙂

What's the big deal with larger screen anyways? It's a *music* player not a portable theater? I dunno maybe it's me but this just isn't that big of a deal.

🙂
 
Originally posted by: C6FT7
A 40GB ipod as thin as the nano? :Q

Call me silly but I like the thicker ipods. The 60GB is perfect. Making it thinner without reducing the overall size doesn't seem right. I mean we all know one day that we'll be wearing wristwatches with 500GB and some kind of xtooth radio that communicates at god knows what speed to an earpiece or (ugh) a chip inside the head. As long as it still tells time it's ok. 🙂

What's the big deal with larger screen anyways? It's a *music* player not a portable theater? I dunno maybe it's me but this just isn't that big of a deal.

🙂
Click to expand...
unless it does play video 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top