- Feb 12, 2004
- 170
- 0
- 0
what gets you the most bang for your buck?
Are 2 7800 GT cards faster?
If so by about how much in most appz? 10%? 20%? Etc...
Are 2 7800 GT cards faster?
If so by about how much in most appz? 10%? 20%? Etc...
Originally posted by: deadseasquirrel
The SLI GTs will be, on average, about 10% faster than the 512GTX at 16x12 4x/8x. Since the GTs are priced MUCH more aggressively, they are the best bang for buck. The 512GTX is $700+ and out of stock just about everywhere. Whereas the GTs can be found for ~$300 each after rebates (or on FS/FT with no rebates). So they're $100+ cheaper and faster at most settings.
The trade-off is that you need an SLI capable motherboard, a good PSU (which, IMO, every system should have anyway), and sufficient cooling in order to run SLI properly. Having used SLI for the past 11 months, I'd have to say that those trade-offs amount to squat compared to the increased performance.
If/When the 512GTX drops to $550, they will be virtually equal from a price-performance equation. Otherwise, unless your monitor's native resolution is above 16x12, or if you just HAVE to play at 20x15, the SLI GTs is your best buy.
Originally posted by: vikingblade
ive heard that SLI does not help the minimum frame rates, only the max.. true??
Also, are there any problems associated with an SLI rig? Is it something a new computer builder can do easily?
Originally posted by: vikingblade
ive heard that SLI does not help the minimum frame rates, only the max.. true??
Also, are there any problems associated with an SLI rig? Is it something a new computer builder can do easily?
Originally posted by: w00t
i'd just get the one has better frames in gaming uses less voltage than both cards and less heat gets dumped inside the case.
Originally posted by: CP5670
How much does SLI help with older games? I think my current power supply should be sufficient for two GTs, which use only a little more power than a 512 GTX, but I'm not totally sure of that.