13Gigatons
Diamond Member
- Apr 19, 2005
- 7,461
- 500
- 126
You know you pay borrow fee everyday on your short position, right? And you know that borrow rate can be less than 1% a year to 200% or even 1,000%, right? GME is considered hard to borrow stock. It has extremely high borrow fee right now you will be paying your broker everyday if you short. That is if you can find a broker who has any shares to lend and will lend it to you. It's the whole reason for the squeeze and the restricted buy that was placed on retail today. So the rich fucks could buy the shares from panicked retail holders of GME while they did that bear raid on GME today by unloading mountain of sell orders at once to drop the price like a rock today and no potential buyers could get in their way to screw up their illegal bear raid?It will come down eventually. Collective internet anger tends to be a temporary thing. Efficient market hypothesis.
Haha he's like Bob's boss from The Incredibles.
There is nothing "fucking stupid" about his question. The value as per the stock price doesn't align with what the company is worth. There is ZERO ability to question this with people that have no idea how the stock market works.
Every logical statement should tell anyone to short it.
It's no different than during the great recession when a select few people were shorting.
Tweak155 and Zorba answered well. But I think it helps to make it personal.
Imagine that I ask you to loan me your spare living room end-table. I will return your table exactly as-is in 1 month. For that, I will pay you $100. You also know what I will do with it in the mean-time. I will sell that table to a stranger. When the month expires, I will buy that table back and return it to you (I'll even clean it up so that nothing changes). You keep the $100 rental fee. Will you take that deal?
In that month, I sell your table to lets say, Ponyo, for $1000. Then in one month I buy it back from Ponyo, for lets say $700. Then I return the table it to you.
You profit $100 (the rental fee). I profit $200 ($300 on the two trades minus the $100 rental fee). Ponyo had your table for a month, hated it, and lost $300.
My gamble is that what if Ponyo likes your table? After the month is up, he requires me to pay $1300 for it. Now Ponyo profits $300. You profit $100, and I'm out $400 (losing $300 to Ponyo on the two trades plus the $100 rental fee). Even worse, what if Ponyo makes me pay $5000 for it. Now I'm out $4100, $4000 to Ponyo and $100 to you. My losses can be infinite if Ponyo wants it to be because after the 1 month time span I am forced to buy it back at whatever price he wants before I can return it to you.
Note: this is a bit of a simplification, I can always borrow another identical end-table to return to you and not quite have an infinite loss.
Uh, overland oil vs pipeline. Nuf said.Things like this honestly begs the question....
Why cant we have bipartisanship?!
Tweak155 and Zorba answered well. But I think it helps to make it personal.
Imagine that I ask you to loan me your spare living room end-table. I will return your table exactly as-is in 1 month. For that, I will pay you $100. You also know what I will do with it in the mean-time. I will sell that table to a stranger. When the month expires, I will buy that table back and return it to you (I'll even clean it up so that nothing changes). You keep the $100 rental fee. Will you take that deal?
In that month, I sell your table to lets say, Ponyo, for $1000. Then in one month I buy it back from Ponyo, for lets say $700. Then I return the table it to you.
You profit $100 (the rental fee). I profit $200 ($300 on the two trades minus the $100 rental fee). Ponyo had your table for a month, hated it, and lost $300.
My gamble is that what if Ponyo likes your table? After the month is up, he requires me to pay $1300 for it. Now Ponyo profits $300. You profit $100, and I'm out $400 (losing $300 to Ponyo on the two trades plus the $100 rental fee). Even worse, what if Ponyo makes me pay $5000 for it. Now I'm out $4100, $4000 to Ponyo and $100 to you. My losses can be infinite if Ponyo wants it to be because after the 1 month time span I am forced to buy it back at whatever price he wants before I can return it to you.
Note: this is a bit of a simplification, I can always borrow another identical end-table to return to you and not quite have an infinite loss.
The point isn't profit. The point is to implode the hedge fund.
Uh, overland oil vs pipeline. Nuf said.
The point isn't profit. The point is to implode the hedge fund.
Uh, it's coming anyway. Truck or rail be way safer.....the source of the oil matters though. It's not simply truck vs pipeline, but de-incentivizing poisonous, earth-destroying fracking.
Obviously, a pipeline is better overall, assuming it is well managed (they rarely are), but it also means far, far less actual jobs. so take what you can get.
anyway, whatever decision leads to the end of fracking is always going to be the right decision.![]()
Them funds are Livin' on a Prayer, saying that You(WSB) Give Us a Bad NameReminds me of the song by Bon Jovi, “Shot down... in a blaze of glory”
Fvck hearing. For what - some stupid tongue lashing for few hours and they hop back on their private jets to go home.Man, great to see the people in power actually understanding and speaking to what really went down here.
Hearings on Capital Hill? Yes, let's have some.
How many GME shares will be needed to buy a 3080 should be the benchmark..GME bux for GPU![]()
And GME has been selling some 3080s on and off, they can scalp GPUs to justify the share price...Oh I know the answer to this... it's a trick question because neither GME shares nor 3080 GPUs are available!
And GME has been selling some 3080s on and off, they can scalp GPUs to justify the share price...
Read like an erotic novel. I feel like I wanna buy some more....This is the most damning proof Citadel and others would've gone bankrupt today if retail wasn't blocked from buying. They wouldn't have been able to pay retail. People showing proof of selling GME for $5,000 today at market sell order before retail was cut off from buying.