2 + 2 = 4

[blake0812]

It all makes sense now

 

[JManInPhoenix]

Bacon is delicious

 

[GagHalfrunt]

2+2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.

 

[Newell Steamer]

And, 4x4=12,... wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub,.... BRRRR-CH-ZZZZZZ, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub!!!

 

[destrekor]

And, 4x4=12,... wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub,.... BRRRR-CH-ZZZZZZ, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub, wub!!!

Didn't eat your pills this morning, I see?

 

[lozina]

what is the common core method for this?

2 + 2 = ?
1 + 1 = 2
2 + 8 = 10
1 + 8 = 9
8 * 8 = 64
64 / 4 = 16
√16 = 4
Speed of light = 299,792,458 m / s
Therefore, 2 + 2 = 4

 

[NoTine42]

1+2+3+4+5+......=

-1/12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-I6XTVZXww

 

[CrackRabbit]

No, 2+2 = 3.999999999999~

 

[DrPizza]

7x13=28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkbQDEXJy2k

 

[Pardus]

7x13=28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkbQDEXJy2k

Funny.

 

[jhu]

2 + 2 = 11
2 + 2 = 4

Both are correct.

 

[lozina]

2 + 2 = 11
2 + 2 = 4

Both are correct.

what about 2 + 2 = 22

especially if you are a programmer!

println "2" + "2";

 

[her209]

1.999... + 1.999... = 3.999...8

 

[Apathetic]

2+2 = 5 for sufficiently large values of 2.

Or for sufficiently wrong definitions of 2 and/or 5

Dave

 

[highland145]

what is the common core method for this?

2 + 2 = ?
1 + 1 = 2
2 + 8 = 10
1 + 8 = 9
8 * 8 = 64
64 / 4 = 16
√16 = 4
Speed of light = 299,792,458 m / s
Therefore, 2 + 2 = 4

 

[slugg]

1.999... + 1.999... = 3.999...8

Hahahaha