1700+@2.3ghz (11.5*200) versus stock 3000+

[littlegohan]

just wondering which cpu is faster? my overclcoked 1700+ , or a stock 3000+

 

[Ilmater]

Well this is hard. The two will perform on different levels. Differences:

- Stock 3000+ has twice the cache that your proc has
- Stock 3000+ has a slower FSB than your proc
- If there was a 3000+ with a T-Bred core instead of a Barton core, it would have a higher clock than yours (2324 vs. 2300)

Given your higher clock and the fact that the 3000+ was actually more like a 2900+ or a 2950+ in benches, I'd say that your proc wins. Especially when your higher FSB is taken into consideration. However, I'd assume that in a few instances, the higher cache would put the 3000+ ahead.

 

[INGlewood78]

My 1700+ @ 2.2 benchmarks faster than a p4 3.0 and AMD 3000+...so I'd say ur 1700+ for sure!

 

[littlegohan]

Originally posted by: INGlewood78
My 1700+ @ 2.2 benchmarks faster than a p4 3.0 and AMD 3000+...so I'd say ur 1700+ for sure!

are you sure about this?
what kind of benchmarks?

 

[INGlewood78]

Sandra

 

[ChampionAtTufshop]

Originally posted by: INGlewood78
Sandra

u do know that isnt the end all benchmark right
synthetically it may win
but in real life situations it may not

 

[INGlewood78]

Originally posted by: ChampionAtTufshop

Originally posted by: INGlewood78
Sandra

u do know that isnt the end all benchmark right
synthetically it may win
but in real life situations it may not

Oh yeah I know...im just comparing a $70 proc with one that is $400...