• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

1700+@2.3ghz (11.5*200) versus stock 3000+

Well this is hard. The two will perform on different levels. Differences:

- Stock 3000+ has twice the cache that your proc has
- Stock 3000+ has a slower FSB than your proc
- If there was a 3000+ with a T-Bred core instead of a Barton core, it would have a higher clock than yours (2324 vs. 2300)

Given your higher clock and the fact that the 3000+ was actually more like a 2900+ or a 2950+ in benches, I'd say that your proc wins. Especially when your higher FSB is taken into consideration. However, I'd assume that in a few instances, the higher cache would put the 3000+ ahead.
 
Originally posted by: ChampionAtTufshop
Originally posted by: INGlewood78
Sandra
Click to expand...

u do know that isnt the end all benchmark right
synthetically it may win
but in real life situations it may not
Click to expand...

Oh yeah I know...im just comparing a $70 proc with one that is $400...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top