168 innocent Pakistani CHILDREN have been MURDERED by US gov.

[Anarchist420]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ikes-in-Pakistan-since-start-of-campaign.html

Why does President Obama have to have such a merciless foreign policy?

Does anyone else think that only a dickhead could order the deaths of little children?

This is dangerous because America really will eventually be invaded if the evil US govt doesn't watch it.

 

[Greenman]

It's called collateral damage. Things like this happen in wars. I don't think we should be there, I don't think we can ever win short of killing everyone. It's time to just pack up and go home.

 

[IGBT]

the usual anti-american action line that gets plugged into news feeds because people in the news business know liberals fall for it every time. Next they will be using the baby milk factory action line for something else. Anybody with half a brain should know these action lines were written years ago and are plug and play in today's world news media.

 

[Newbian]

It's called collateral damage. Things like this happen in wars. I don't think we should be there, I don't think we can ever win short of killing everyone. It's time to just pack up and go home.

This.

When terrorist hide behind civilians it happens a lot more often so it's up to the civilians to stop it by going after the cowards.

 

[Incorruptible]

obama has not only killed children in these drone strikes but many other innocent people, he changed the rules so even teenaged boys are considered "militants"

But just watch as his supporters will defend him and the murder of innocent children

 

[WelshBloke]

It's called collateral damage. Things like this happen in wars. I don't think we should be there, I don't think we can ever win short of killing everyone. It's time to just pack up and go home.

Dangerous thinking there. Thats the kind of crap that terrorists use to justify flying planes into skyscrapers.

 

[ichy]

Dangerous thinking there. Thats the kind of crap that terrorists use to justify flying planes into skyscrapers.

Bullshit. There's a difference between targeting terrorist leaders who sometimes hide behind innocent people and deliberately flying airliners into buildings.

 

[spittledip]

Wow, 775 civilians estimated killed.

Imagine if there was a more powerful country that started to do drone strikes in our country. I can't imagine that anyone here would support that.

 

[Pocatello]

Wow, 775 civilians estimated killed.

Imagine if there was a more powerful country that started to do drone strikes in our country. I can't imagine that anyone here would support that.

Of course nobody here would support us being bombed by another country. That why I prefer our country to be the strongest. If some country think they can bomb the U.S without consequences, they would. I think Japan tried it once.

 

[Incorruptible]

Bullshit. There's a difference between targeting terrorist leaders who sometimes hide behind innocent people and deliberately flying airliners into buildings.

So is it alright to to kill those terrorists if innocent children have to die as well?

 

[ichy]

Wow, 775 civilians estimated killed.

Compared to the number of Pakistanis slaughtered by other Pakistanis that's a drop in the bucket.

 

[Newbian]

So is it alright to to kill those terrorists if innocent children have to die as well?

They don't have to die but not all of them are innocent as many are brainwashed young to sacrifice themselves for what they are forced to do.

Also blame the terrorists for hiding behind children assuming they are safe while they kill dozens of others and try their best to kill hundreds more.

 

[Newbian]

Compared to the number of Pakistanis slaughtered by other Pakistanis that's a drop in the bucket.

This.

Killing some of them can save thousands in the long run.

 

[dud]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ikes-in-Pakistan-since-start-of-campaign.html

Why does President Obama have to have such a merciless foreign policy?

Does anyone else think that only a dickhead could order the deaths of little children?

This is dangerous because America really will eventually be invaded if the evil US govt doesn't watch it.

OP, you fit the penultimate definition of the Internet troll. AFAIK the US Government has never knowingly target civilians in these attacks. The Taliban, on the other hand have no problem taking out civilians while conducting their "attacks".

OP, I am no fan of Obama ... but you are lower than low. You are the Internet troll with words like this: "Does anyone else think that only a dickhead could order the deaths of little children?"

OP, you should have to live with the Taliban (as one of their "wives") ... then come back and report back. Tool ...

 

[Lemon law]

obama has not only killed children in these drone strikes but many other innocent people, he changed the rules so even teenaged boys are considered "militants"

But just watch as his supporters will defend him and the murder of innocent children

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I may be somewhat of an Obama supporter, simply because all the alternatives were worse. but I still have to agree that Obama's use of drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan are not only counter productive to US foreign policy, but they are certified 100% war crimes on the part of the USA.

I had no problem in advocating that GWB&co and his merry band of neo-con sleezyballs should be sent to the sent to the Hague to answer to the war crimes they undeniably committed. And why should I be inconsistent when Obama is also committing international war crimes now.

 

[WelshBloke]

Bullshit. There's a difference between targeting terrorist leaders who sometimes hide behind innocent people and deliberately flying airliners into buildings.

Really? You can't see this from the other side and see parallels?

Them targeting the Pentagon and twin towers but saying all the innocents were unfortunate extras?

 

[WhipperSnapper]

If they were murdered, they were killed by the terrorists and Islamic Fundamentalists hiding behind them.

 

[EagleKeeper]

So who is going to go after the militants for war crimes. Hiding behind civilians, exposing them to military action.

How is this any different that when armies used to round up captured civilians and march them in front off the lines to take the first volleys

 

[5150Joker]

I wonder if Obama sheds any tears for the kids his drones kill? His tearing up on camera yesterday was extremely phony and meant for a cheap photo OP. I even supported this guy against Romney but come on, he's definitely a professional actor.

 

[Jaskalas]

Wow, 775 civilians estimated killed.

Imagine if there was a more powerful country that started to do drone strikes in our country. I can't imagine that anyone here would support that.

Really? Dems wouldn't want red neck christian terrorists taken care of?

 

[JEDIYoda]

His tearing up on camera yesterday was extremely phony and meant for a cheap photo OP.

That was a dumb ass comment and you know it....get over the fact that Romney got ass raped!!

 

[nehalem256]

When you fight a war people die.

I don't know why people are so shocked by this concept.

 

[Greenman]

Dangerous thinking there. Thats the kind of crap that terrorists use to justify flying planes into skyscrapers.

Terrorists don't need any justification. They have hate.

 

[OutHouse]

here is an idea, how about if the fucking pakistani fuckheads get serious about stomping out extremist islam and Taliban. its their own fault that their own people are getting killed.

i have no sympathy.

 

[gevorg]

I wonder if Obama sheds any tears for the kids his drones kill? His tearing up on camera yesterday was extremely phony and meant for a cheap photo OP. I even supported this guy against Romney but come on, he's definitely a professional actor.

he is a professional politician, they can switch from smiling to crying in an instant