.

[warcrow]

.

 

[Schadenfroh]

.

 

[Teliasen]

..

 

[Schadenfroh]

...

 

[wallsfd949]

....

 

[naruto1988]

.....

 

[Crusty]

......

 

[LeetViet]

Super Saiyan 3.14

 

[xcript]

Hello.

 

[Crusty]

What is this..our OWN NEF thread in Software!!!!11!1oneoen!!!oen!!!!one!!!!!111

 

[effee]

..?

 

[Robor]

I've seen plenty of nef threads in Distributed Computing but Software? Of course I've got to get in on it.

BTW, if I let the DC forum know about this it would be 3 digits by the end of the day...

 

[Zugzwang152]

Originally posted by: Robor
I've seen plenty of nef threads in Distributed Computing but Software? Of course I've got to get in on it.

BTW, if I let the DC forum know about this it would be 3 digits by the end of the day...

fortunately you DC'ers stay in the cave that is the DC forum and rarely venture out into daylight.

 

[Elcs]

Originally posted by: Zugzwang152

Originally posted by: Robor
I've seen plenty of nef threads in Distributed Computing but Software? Of course I've got to get in on it.

BTW, if I let the DC forum know about this it would be 3 digits by the end of the day...

fortunately you DC'ers stay in the cave that is the DC forum and rarely venture out into daylight.

Whats the DC forum? Sounds like I dont want to visit there.

Anyway, this is a great way to get my post count up. Someone say something so I can reply

 

[klah]

What we here require is a criterion by which to distinguish with certainty between pure and empirical knowledge. Experience teaches us that a thing is so and so, but not that it cannot be otherwise. First, then, if we have a proposition which in being thought is thought as necessary, it is an a priori judgment; and if, besides, it is not derived from any proposition except one which also has the validity of a necessary judgment, it is an absolutely a priori judgment.

 

[kamper]

Originally posted by: klah
What we here require is a criterion by which to distinguish with certainty between pure and empirical knowledge. Experience teaches us that a thing is so and so, but not that it cannot be otherwise. First, then, if we have a proposition which in being thought is thought as necessary, it is an a priori judgment; and if, besides, it is not derived from any proposition except one which also has the validity of a necessary judgment, it is an absolutely a priori judgment.

I disagree wholeheartedly!

 

[Elcs]

Originally posted by: klah
What we here require is a criterion by which to distinguish with certainty between pure and empirical knowledge. Experience teaches us that a thing is so and so, but not that it cannot be otherwise. First, then, if we have a proposition which in being thought is thought as necessary, it is an a priori judgment; and if, besides, it is not derived from any proposition except one which also has the validity of a necessary judgment, it is an absolutely a priori judgment.

Good judgement comes from experience. However, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.

 

[drag]

Originally posted by: Elcs

Originally posted by: klah
What we here require is a criterion by which to distinguish with certainty between pure and empirical knowledge. Experience teaches us that a thing is so and so, but not that it cannot be otherwise. First, then, if we have a proposition which in being thought is thought as necessary, it is an a priori judgment; and if, besides, it is not derived from any proposition except one which also has the validity of a necessary judgment, it is an absolutely a priori judgment.

Good judgement comes from experience. However, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.

B.S.

Pure and simple.

Me? I never learn from my mistakes. That way everyday is a wonderfull new experiance, my mind is open like that of a child.

Oh, shiny keys.... must.. stick.. in... wall... socket..

 

[jlarsson]

I bent my wookie...