Every american should run their household like that and see how it turns out, i mean if the president does it why can't anyone else?
Well, it's a good thing, then, that household debt is incomparable to national debt.
I know these frivolous comparisons work for the drooling simple people out there, but come on....
Of course I dont. I have voted for several republican candidates, and before I went to school and learned about political science I supported third party candidates. I don't even vote anymore, as voting is pointless.
You might not like what I'm telling you but it doesn't make it any less true. A viable national third party will never, ever, ever happen given our current system of electing people. A viable third party depends on voters acting irrationally.
Sure it is. It's just you need a never ending credit line and an increase in income every year. The increase in income has to be not high enough to pay your own bills so you still need to put stuff on credit, but just enough to pay the minimum payments/interest each month.
SlowSpyder
Diamond Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 8,886
I'm voting 3rd party for the first time in my life today for that reason. I'm tired of both groups doing the same things while pointing the finger at the other party. Both the Democrats and Republicans at this point don't care about you or me, they just want to stay in power so they can continue to be elected royalty.
You understand that the interest rate on government debt is effectively negative at this time, yes? And has been for the past few years?
This is the single most depressing post I've read all year. You are one of the smartest posters on P&N and this is about the dumbest thing I've ever seen you post.
Not that it matters to you but you've definitely lost some respect points from me.
If anyone should be voting it should be people like you who are knowledgable of the issues.
I think I read that cubby doesn't vote either and while I disagree with pretty much every political position he has it's still really a shame that people aren't voting.
Both of your government complaint cards should be revoked.
You do realize we pay $269,000,000,000 a year towards that negative interest rate?
If someone offered to loan you $10,000 now and have you pay them back $9,000 later you're arguing that you wouldn't do it because of debt payments?
Since when are we paying back the loan? Let me guess, this negative interest is only on a small portion of the debt?
Those are not facts,they are manipulated statistics.
i.e.: (I'll just pull one @ random)
"3. Unemployment has dropped from 10.1% in October of 2009 to 5.9% and projected to reach 5.4% by summer of 2015."
Well yeah,since the administration changed the definition of "not having a job" to "collecting unemployment" in order to skew the numbers
Here's the real "unemployment" number: 12.6%
http://www.forbes.com/sites/louisefron/2014/08/20/tackling-the-real-unemployment-rate-12-6/
http://rt.com/usa/156800-americans-economy-unemployed-work/
Well I'm sorry if I disappoint you, but I'm just following the math. If you vote because your goal is to place your preferred candidate in office you are wasting your time.
To be clear there are other reasons to vote, it makes people feel good, for one. So if you find value in voting then I encourage you to do it, but we should all do it with clear eyes as to what it accomplishes.
I vote
<snip>
I just understand how the game is played...those who show up win.
You voted. I did not vote. Overall, Republicans won this election cycle.
It is the chaos that is elections, and the value of one singular vote.
"The $1.4 trillion federal budget deficit that Obama inherited in 2009 was in a large part due to the high rate of unemployment. When millions of people were put out of work in 2008 and 2009, it resulted in far less income taxes and less economic activity to generate federal revenue."
Oh ya, revenue was down $419 Billion in 2009 but just ignore that $535 Billion increase in spending.
Says the guy who thinks billionaires who think the rich should pay more in taxes shouldn't voluntarily pay more taxes because it's the aggregate of taxes from multiple tax payers that make the policy effective.
I vote, not because I think my vote is more important than others (it's not, it's equal), but rather to nullify someone else's vote whose policy views directly contradict mine with the hope that there are more peoples views like mine.
No disillusionment found, I just understand how the game is played...those who show up win.
The BOL has always used U3 as the official measurement.Those are not facts,they are manipulated statistics.
i.e.: (I'll just pull one @ random)
"3. Unemployment has dropped from 10.1% in October of 2009 to 5.9% and projected to reach 5.4% by summer of 2015."
Well yeah,since the administration changed the definition of "not having a job" to "collecting unemployment" in order to skew the numbers
Here's the real "unemployment" number: 12.6%
http://www.forbes.com/sites/louisefron/2014/08/20/tackling-the-real-unemployment-rate-12-6/
http://rt.com/usa/156800-americans-economy-unemployed-work/
Sure it is. It's just you need a never ending credit line and an increase in income every year. The increase in income has to be not high enough to pay your own bills so you still need to put stuff on credit, but just enough to pay the minimum payments/interest each month.
Fact: If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, if you like your plan, you can keep it, period, end of story.