128k vs 256k cache of Sempron Skt 754

irenealan

Senior member
Mar 11, 2004
382
0
0
Hi, I tried to find out if the extra 128k cache of a Sempron skt 754 would give any difference but most articles I found stated that with overclocking, the extra cache won't yield much difference and the performance edge is insignificant. Is that true? Should I not bother to get the extra cache and save some $? Thanks for your comment!
 

Fox5

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
5,957
7
81
Assuming both overclock to the same speed, the one with 256KB cache will perform about 200 mhz better.
However, I think the 256KB ones are 130nm while the 128KB is 90nm, which would make it probably overclock better.
 

Duvie

Elite Member
Feb 5, 2001
16,215
0
71
cache in games makes a bigger difference and 128 to 256 is a nice big jump almost more so then 256 was to 512 and 512 to 1mb.....I stil dont think it probably earns the PR rating as most of the AMD pr ratings are borked IMO...
 

mindwreck

Golden Member
May 25, 2003
1,585
1
81
the difference ins't as big as most people think Text

I went ahead and bought the 2800+ with 256k cache because i felt like, whatever, its only 10 bucks more and overclocks well.
If your buget is that tight i would get the 128k.
 

Impaqt

Member
Jul 6, 2004
36
0
0
THe extra 128k is NOT a huge benefit... Nowhere near an "Extra 200mhz" maybe 50..... MAYBE..... I've extensively tested Sempron 754s... and found the 2600+ to be the very best bang for the buck....

 

irenealan

Senior member
Mar 11, 2004
382
0
0
Thanks for all the help! Cuz I am deciding whether I should get a 2600+, 2800+ or the 3000+. If the extra cache won't matter much then I will choose between 2600+ and 3000+. Since the price difference between the two isn't much, then I wonder if it's worth to get the 3000+ for the bigger multiplier. What do you guys think?
 

sangyup81

Golden Member
Feb 22, 2005
1,082
1
81
from what I've seen, it seems that the 256k version overclocks better
i wouldn't call it a scientific analysis though
 

Budman

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,980
0
0
If you want cool & quiet get the 3000+ because the 2600+ and 2800+ dont support cool & quiet.

Just an other thing for you to think about. ;)
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,972
13,065
136
Originally posted by: Fox5
However, I think the 256KB ones are 130nm while the 128KB is 90nm, which would make it probably overclock better.

Not true. All the Palermo-core Semprons are 90nm CPUs. This includes the Palermo 2800+ and 3100+, both of which have 256k l2 cache. Keep in mind that the older 3100+ is a 130nm chip(and is not a Palermo).