Originally posted by: chizow
Originally posted by: mfbf
Anybody tell me which is better CF or SM? My digital camera can take either but is one really better than the other since they are almost the same price after rebate.
mfbf
CF is faster but draws more power. CF is also used in a larger variety of periphs, so you don't have to buy as many flashmem formats.
I wish they had this deal on Viking CF, there is a noticeable difference with digicams depending on CF speed, as posted in a review at Steve's digicams or DPReview. IIRC Sandisk was one of the worse
Chiz