12/7/41, a date which will live in infamy

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
No your views are extremely uncommon and fringe.

I would say that Eurocentrism is fringe. Most people in the world don't practice it.

Non-profits are fine. A lot of them are based in Europe. Amnesty International was founded in and headquartered in your favorite, the UK.

Do you think that they're racist if they target European policies?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I would say that Eurocentrism is fringe. Most people in the world don't practice it.



Do you think that they're racist if they target European policies?

Eurocentrism is pretty uncommon. But that's not what makes you unusual is it? It's your Europhobia. Are you part of any organizations that share your view that Churchill is worse than Hitler or that the UK should be bombed in response to recent BP-related events?

Is who racist if they target European policies? Amnesty International? They are not racist. They don't focus 99% of their attention on Europe. Right now on their homepage they are pretty evenly spread across the map in their critiques.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Eurocentrism is pretty uncommon. But that's not what makes you unusual is it? It's your Europhobia. Are you part of any organizations that share your view that Churchill is worse than Hitler or that the UK should be bombed in response to recent BP-related events?
Most of the people on this forum are Eurocentric. Opposing Eurocentrism is not Europhobia.

I'm not aware of many organizations dedicated to stances like that on any topic. That seems like a bizarre thing to create an association for. However, there are many scholars that support me. Churchill is deeply unpopular in many parts of the world for his atrocities just as Hitler is unpopular here because of his atrocities. We don't popularly focus on Churchill's atrocities, but that doesn't erase them from history. But other cultures do emphasize Churchill's atrocities and our worship of him is going to look quite horrific as the new powers emerge.

Is who racist if they target European policies? Amnesty International? They are not racist. They don't focus 99% of their attention on Europe. Right now on their homepage they are pretty evenly spread across the map in their critiques.
Human rights organizations targeting European policies. For example, there are many focused on the plight of the Roma in Europe. Are those organizations racist? Do you consider the Roma to be European?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Human rights organizations targeting European policies. For example, there are many focused on the plight of the Roma in Europe. Are those organizations racist? Do you consider the Roma to be European?

No those organizations are not racist. A lot of organizations are single-issue organizations.

Depends on that their citizenship if we're talking about citizenship. Culturally it does not seem like they are well integrated into European culture.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
No those organizations are not racist. A lot of organizations are single-issue organizations.

Depends on that their citizenship if we're talking about citizenship. Culturally it does not seem like they are well integrated into European culture.

What is European culture? Who gets to pick and choose what is European culture? Is the culture of the Roma not European culture?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
By classifying it as a minority subculture of Europe, are you putting it on par with the cultures of the Basques, Catalans, Scottish, etc.?

What do you mean by "on par?" Basques, Catalans, and Scots are very well integrated and have been around Europe for thousands of years. The Romani have a more recent presence in Europe and are very poorly integrated. Where is this going? If a Romani is a citizen they are citizens...
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
What do you mean by "on par?" Basques, Catalans, and Scots are very well integrated and have been around Europe for thousands of years. The Romani have a more recent presence in Europe and are very poorly integrated. Where is this going? If a Romani is a citizen they are citizens...

I want to know if you are putting them in a different category. Where is the cut off? The Roma have been around for hundreds of years; the earliest reference to Catalonia is in the 1300s which is similar to the first reference of the Roma. The Roma were in Europe before Mozart, the Englightenment, Newton, etc.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
I want to know if you are putting them in a different category. Where is the cut off? The Roma have been around for hundreds of years; the earliest reference to Catalonia is in the 1300s which is similar to the first reference of the Roma. The Roma were in Europe before Mozart, the Englightenment, Newton, etc.

They are classified as the same of other "travelers" both in mainland Europe and in the UK, their nationality or heritage is of no importance what so ever to anyone, their behaviour is.

If you are completely unwilling to live in a society, work in a society or adhere to the laws of a society you will become an outcast, that goes for EVERYONE regardless of age, sex, nationality or ethnicity.

I know you are trying to imply this has to do with racism but it doesn't, not even a little bit.

I suppose in a brain that can concoct a defense for Churchill being worse then Hitler there is no sanity left though.

Your poor parents must be so ashamed of you.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
They are classified as the same of other "travelers" both in mainland Europe and in the UK, their nationality or heritage is of no importance what so ever to anyone, their behaviour is.

If you are completely unwilling to live in a society, work in a society or adhere to the laws of a society you will become an outcast, that goes for EVERYONE regardless of age, sex, nationality or ethnicity.

I know you are trying to imply this has to do with racism but it doesn't, not even a little bit.

We're talking about culture.

I suppose in a brain that can concoct a defense for Churchill being worse then Hitler there is no sanity left though.

Your poor parents must be so ashamed of you.

Churchill was a monster and anyone trying to wash away his atrocities is akin to a Holocaust denier.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,569
3,762
126
This thread is not even close to what I expected. The stupidity in this thread far surpasses what I would have thought possible - even for P&N
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
This thread is not even close to what I expected. The stupidity in this thread far surpasses what I would have thought possible - even for P&N
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on this thread Exterous, it somewhat started well, but in typical P&N style it slowly degenerated into the absurd.

One thing we can't deny, 12/7/1941 was a pivotal event in world history. And our OP was correct in starting the thread.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
I want to know if you are putting them in a different category. Where is the cut off? The Roma have been around for hundreds of years; the earliest reference to Catalonia is in the 1300s which is similar to the first reference of the Roma. The Roma were in Europe before Mozart, the Englightenment, Newton, etc.

Category related to what?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
The other ones I listed.

I've lost track of what we're talking about. Romani are citizens of whatever country they have citizenship with. Romani are a minority culture in Europe. What else do you want to know specifically?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
I've lost track of what we're talking about. Romani are citizens of whatever country they have citizenship with. Romani are a minority culture in Europe. What else do you want to know specifically?

Do you prefer Catalans to be a minority culture of Europe? Scots, etc.
 

Exterous

Super Moderator
Jun 20, 2006
20,569
3,762
126
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on this thread Exterous, it somewhat started well, but in typical P&N style it slowly degenerated into the absurd.

o_O It had degenerated by the first reply. Ah wel....
 

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,130
749
126
all i have to say is, it's great that 60 years later after pearl harbor and the atomic bombings that Japan and the US are great allies.

i've been to both places back to back this year and it's really depressing to know and see what kind of destruction happened at those places.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
all i have to say is, it's great that 60 years later after pearl harbor and the atomic bombings that Japan and the US are great allies.

i've been to both places back to back this year and it's really depressing to know and see what kind of destruction happened at those places.

I have always been amazed at that as well. It really is a tribute to the way we dealt with our former foes post WW II.