Originally posted by: ndee
They all suck but #2 is the best looking.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: ndee
They all suck but #2 is the best looking.
Originally posted by: chin311
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: ndee
They all suck but #2 is the best looking.
Originally posted by: LakAttack
Originally posted by: ndee
They all suck but #2 is the best looking.
Agreed.
<---- (Adidas Fanboy)
Originally posted by: Ornery
- What kind of men worry so much about their clothes?
Originally posted by: Ornery
Putting food on the table, keeping things organized, clean and sanitary. Only thing I car about my cars is that they're safe and keep rolling.
Edit: Are you, by any chance, a "Style over Substance" kind of guy?
Originally posted by: Ornery
Not style and substance. Style OVER substance. Spending more for less substance because of style concerns is flippin' ghey!
Apple consumers are famously style-minded and will often make a purchase decision based on a computer's color rather than its storage capacity.
Originally posted by: Ornery
"Hm? Which one would you take: A fugly as hell computer with a 120GB harddisk or the same computer, a lot better looking, but only 80GB. Same price. I would go with the good looking one. "
Can't get 'em for the same price, even with a 50% larger capacity. That's the point! A PC is a tool not a piece of sculpture. Putting neon lights in 'em, and painting them all sorts of fancy colors is pretty damn twisted to me. I don't blame manufacturers for doing it, because it seems there's a market for this crap, but I do blame certain consumers for creating this market in the first place. $100.00 for tennis shoes?![]()
Originally posted by: LakAttack
Originally posted by: ndee
They all suck but #2 is the best looking.
Agreed.
<---- (Adidas Fanboy)