11 year old girl gang-raped by 5

[SagaLore]

Originally posted by: SSSnail

She went into a basement bedroom with one of the suspects and began to have sex. She said she wasn't held against her will but that she "felt pressured" to submit.[/i]

I didn't know they breed slvts that young, but read the full article before condemning the perps. Even though this is wrong on a lot of levels, but I don't think rape is used appropriately in this case. Apparently, she wasn't held against her will, no vilence involved, so it's not classified as raped.

Exactly.

which showed the 11-year-old naked from the waist down on top of one of the suspects

 

[Alone]

Another Pope touching little girls.

Ugh.

 

[Kelvrick]

Originally posted by: randay

wrong. its rape whether she consented or not. legally she cannot consent to sex. most of those boys cant either.

So she raped them?!

Legally, it is rape, but its not like hte media is trying to make it or what people immediately think of when they hear 5 kids rape an 11 yo. At least me, I think of them grabbing her off the street and violently raping her in some basement, not what is described to happen here.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: SagaLore

Originally posted by: SSSnail

She went into a basement bedroom with one of the suspects and began to have sex. She said she wasn't held against her will but that she "felt pressured" to submit.[/i]

I didn't know they breed slvts that young, but read the full article before condemning the perps. Even though this is wrong on a lot of levels, but I don't think rape is used appropriately in this case. Apparently, she wasn't held against her will, no vilence involved, so it's not classified as raped.

Exactly.

which showed the 11-year-old naked from the waist down on top of one of the suspects

i would think 5 boys 15-19 would have an easy time to talk a young girl into sex.

and yes it is still rape. while not the typcial rape you think of it is still rape. a 11 yr old can not consent to sex.

 

[regnez]

Originally posted by: AgentJean

Originally posted by: PokerGuy
Perhaps burning people at the stake like in medieval Europe isn't always a bad idea. These guys should be burned at the stake.

I think flayed alive is a better option.

Flayed alive while burning at the stake FTW.

 

[randay]

Originally posted by: Kelvrick

Originally posted by: randay

wrong. its rape whether she consented or not. legally she cannot consent to sex. most of those boys cant either.

So she raped them?!

its possible, but would never hold up in court.

Legally, it is rape, but its not like hte media is trying to make it or what people immediately think of when they hear 5 kids rape an 11 yo. At least me, I think of them grabbing her off the street and violently raping her in some basement, not what is described to happen here.

The article says that she said she was pressured into it. Or at least she felt pressured. Its obvious that if the boys didnt talk to her she would not have had sex with them. yes there is a difference between violent rape and rape, when I read the article it didnt seem to suggest violent rape at all.

 

[Xyclone]

WTF?! :|