11/05 BCS Rankings are out

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sciencewhiz

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
5,885
8
81
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: Wreckem

So WTF are you arguing about? I never said Rutgers wouldnt jump some teams. I said theres no shot at them playing for the title because its impossible for them to jump 10 teams without several of those teams losing.

Either Ohio State or Michigan is guaranteed to lose.
At least one, and probably 2 of Florida, Auburn, and Arkansas will lose.
At least one, and probably 2 of USC, Cal, and Notre Dame will lose.

So, rutgers has to only jump half as many teams.

OSU/Michigan losing wont have any effect on Rutgers moving up.

Rutgers wont jump over the SEC or Big 12 Champions. Unless said team has 2 losses.

If USC beats Cal and Notre Dame. Rutgers wont jump over them. Likewise if Cal beats USC, Rutgers wont jump over Cal.

But its moot, Rutgers wont beat both Louisville and WVU.

In Colley, the only 1 loss team that would be ahead of undefeated Rutgers is USC. I think USC only having 1 loss is about as likely as Rutgers beating Louisville and WVU.

The rest of the computers should be similar.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: her209
What do you guys think about the number of games that the top 10 teams have left would affect the final rankings:

...
3 Louisville - 3 games (S. Florida, Pittsburgh, UConn)
I thought they also play Rutgers :confused:
Oops... you're right. I missed that one.

ESPN's website not loading for me at the moment tho. :(
 
Nov 7, 2000
16,403
3
81
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: her209
What do you guys think about the number of games that the top 10 teams have left would affect the final rankings:

...
3 Louisville - 3 games (S. Florida, Pittsburgh, UConn)
I thought they also play Rutgers :confused:
Oops... you're right. I missed that one.

ESPN's website not loading for me at the moment tho. :(
consider conference championships too

still lots of time for teams to falter, or go out strong with big wins
 

arod

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2000
4,236
0
76
Originally posted by: her209
What do you guys think about the number of games that the top 10 teams have left would affect the final rankings:

1 Ohio State - 2 games (Northwestern, #2 Michigan)
2 Michigan - 2 games (Indiana, #1 Ohio State)
3 Louisville - 4 games (#13 Rutgers, S. Florida, Pittsburgh, UConn)
4 Florida - 3 games (S. Carolina, W. Carolina, Florida St.)
5 Texas - 2 games (Kansas St., #25 Texas A&M)
6 Auburn - 2 games (Georgia, Alabama)
7 USC - 4 games (#20 Oregon, #8 California, #9 Notre Dame, UCLA)
8 California - 3 games (Arizona, #7 USC, Stanford)
9 Notre Dame - 3 games (Air Force, Army, #7 USC)
10 West Virgina - 4 games (Cincy, Pittsburgh, S. Florida, #13 Rutgers)

if usc wins out its likely they would go.... thats a pretty tough schedule left.

 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: HardcoreRobot
Originally posted by: her209
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: her209
What do you guys think about the number of games that the top 10 teams have left would affect the final rankings:

...
3 Louisville - 3 games (S. Florida, Pittsburgh, UConn)
I thought they also play Rutgers :confused:
Oops... you're right. I missed that one.

ESPN's website not loading for me at the moment tho. :(
consider conference championships too

still lots of time for teams to falter, or go out strong with big wins

Do conference championships get factored into the BCS calculations?
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Originally posted by: arod
Originally posted by: her209
What do you guys think about the number of games that the top 10 teams have left would affect the final rankings:

1 Ohio State - 2 games (Northwestern, #2 Michigan)
2 Michigan - 2 games (Indiana, #1 Ohio State)
3 Louisville - 4 games (#13 Rutgers, S. Florida, Pittsburgh, UConn)
4 Florida - 3 games (S. Carolina, W. Carolina, Florida St.)
5 Texas - 2 games (Kansas St., #25 Texas A&M)
6 Auburn - 2 games (Georgia, Alabama)
7 USC - 4 games (#20 Oregon, #8 California, #9 Notre Dame, UCLA)
8 California - 3 games (Arizona, #7 USC, Stanford)
9 Notre Dame - 3 games (Air Force, Army, #7 USC)
10 West Virgina - 4 games (Cincy, Pittsburgh, S. Florida, #13 Rutgers)

if usc wins out its likely they would go.... thats a pretty tough schedule left.

Go to what? Championship game? I don't know about that. But then that means Cal could still go to the Rose Bowl? Hah, unlikely.

Now if USC loses out to Cal, which there exists some possibility for, then it's roses for Cal.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Do conference championships get factored into the BCS calculations?

conference championships are treated like a normal game.

Interesting...so the SEC runner-up could conceivably get counted for two losses to the same team?
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Wreckem

No one needs to worry about Rutgers even if the beat Louisville, there is no way they can get to the #2 spot.

What if they also beat WVU?

(Not that I care...personally, I Rutgers'll lose to both)

Theres just no way to go from unranked to the title game in the course of a season. Even with wins vs both they have WAY to much ground to make up. Rutgers isnt going to jump over the 10 teams in front of it in the human polls unless those teams lose.

If Rutgers beats WVU and Louisville they will be ranked high in the human polls, no doubt about it.

They wont jump 10 spots. The human polls dont work that way.

I'd say they'd jump significantly

The human polls don't work that way because they've already built the two losses to WVU and Louisville into their expectations.

If Rutgers actually wins those games, those voters will have to do a lot of rethinking ;)
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,225
4,006
136
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Wreckem

No one needs to worry about Rutgers even if the beat Louisville, there is no way they can get to the #2 spot.

What if they also beat WVU?

(Not that I care...personally, I Rutgers'll lose to both)

Theres just no way to go from unranked to the title game in the course of a season. Even with wins vs both they have WAY to much ground to make up. Rutgers isnt going to jump over the 10 teams in front of it in the human polls unless those teams lose.

If Rutgers beats WVU and Louisville they will be ranked high in the human polls, no doubt about it.

They wont jump 10 spots. The human polls dont work that way.

I'd say they'd jump significantly

The human polls don't work that way because they've already built the two losses to WVU and Louisville into their expectations.

If Rutgers actually wins those games, those voters will have to do a lot of rethinking ;)
How'd you come up with that theory?

The preconceived bias isn't that Rutgers already has two losses for games yet to be played (if so, they'd probably be near the end of the top 25). The preconceived bias is that they started the season unranked; so despite an unbeaten record, they aren't a great team until they start beating some Top 10 teams. At least they'll have their shots. It's much more of a theoretical exercise to rank Boise State, which probably will get an automatic BCS berth anyway.

Is DLeRium correct that if USC wins out and again goes to the BCS title game, Cal will receive the Rose Bowl bid?
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: manly
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: Wreckem
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: Wreckem

No one needs to worry about Rutgers even if the beat Louisville, there is no way they can get to the #2 spot.

What if they also beat WVU?

(Not that I care...personally, I Rutgers'll lose to both)

Theres just no way to go from unranked to the title game in the course of a season. Even with wins vs both they have WAY to much ground to make up. Rutgers isnt going to jump over the 10 teams in front of it in the human polls unless those teams lose.

If Rutgers beats WVU and Louisville they will be ranked high in the human polls, no doubt about it.

They wont jump 10 spots. The human polls dont work that way.

I'd say they'd jump significantly

The human polls don't work that way because they've already built the two losses to WVU and Louisville into their expectations.

If Rutgers actually wins those games, those voters will have to do a lot of rethinking ;)
How'd you come up with that theory?

The preconceived bias isn't that Rutgers already has two losses for games yet to be played (if so, they'd probably be near the end of the top 25). The preconceived bias is that they started the season unranked; so despite an unbeaten record, they aren't a great team until they start beating some Top 10 teams. At least they'll have their shots. It's much more of a theoretical exercise to rank Boise State, which probably will get an automatic BCS berth anyway.

Is DLeRium correct that if USC wins out and again goes to the BCS title game, Cal will receive the Rose Bowl bid?

Wait...isn't that what we're talking about? How Rutgers would be ranked if they beat Louisville (3) and WVU (10)?
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,225
4,006
136
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Wait...isn't that what we're talking about? How Rutgers would be ranked if they beat Louisville (3) and WVU (10)?
Yes. But then you made the questionable statement that Rutgers is ranked where it is because humans have already factored future losses into their current ranking. Now I realize I'm paraphrasing, but that's the most reasonable reading of your post.

Btw, I mostly agree that Rutgers would jump pretty high if they beat two Top-10 teams(although not all the way to BCS #2). However, your apparent rationale for their current ranking is mystifying.

There would have to be nearly a perfect storm of upsets to get an unbeaten Rutgers into the BCS title game; and then surely the whole system would be scrapped and replaced with some playoff.
 

sciencewhiz

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
5,885
8
81
Originally posted by: manly
Is DLeRium correct that if USC wins out and again goes to the BCS title game, Cal will receive the Rose Bowl bid?

It's definetly a strong possibility. There are 10 spots for teams in BCS bowls, and 6 are guaranteed to BCS conference champions. Boise State would be guaranteed one of the remaining 4 spots, and the OSU/Michigan loser would likely be guaranteed a spot by being in the top 4 of the BCS rankings.

Since the Rose Bowl would lose both the Big 10 and Pac 10 champions, they would get first pick of 2 teams and would almost certainly pick OSU/Michigan loser and Cal.
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
If anything Texas is playing worse than they did when OSU stompted them...and I'm not confident at all they they are going to be A&M anyway

Florida has more quality games left, and if they win out, there is no way Texas passes them, period.

I actually think both Florida and Texas are going to lose before the end of the season, which should make things very interesting.

I think the championship game will be OSU v Louisville, with a Michigan v USC Rose bowl game
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: manly
Is DLeRium correct that if USC wins out and again goes to the BCS title game, Cal will receive the Rose Bowl bid?

It's definetly a strong possibility. There are 10 spots for teams in BCS bowls, and 6 are guaranteed to BCS conference champions. Boise State would be guaranteed one of the remaining 4 spots, and the OSU/Michigan loser would likely be guaranteed a spot by being in the top 4 of the BCS rankings.

Since the Rose Bowl would lose both the Big 10 and Pac 10 champions, they would get first pick of 2 teams and would almost certainly pick OSU/Michigan loser and Cal.

Not that strong. I think a more likely possibility is:

Rose: OSU/Michigan loser vs. Cal/USC winnar
Holiday Bowl: Cal/USC loser vs. Texas A&M?
Championship: OSU/Michigan winnar vs. Louisville? Rutgers is unlikely

Anyways, if I had to put money down, it would be OSU vs. Louisville for the championship.

I'd coin flip for the Rose Bowl. Even if USC has a good chance of winning against Cal, it needs to beat Oregon, ND and fUCLA, and if it slips once more against either team, it's over.

Edit: for those who think Michigan will win (small chance), then we could see Wisconsin going into the rose bowl?
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
Originally posted by: manly
Is DLeRium correct that if USC wins out and again goes to the BCS title game, Cal will receive the Rose Bowl bid?

It's definetly a strong possibility. There are 10 spots for teams in BCS bowls, and 6 are guaranteed to BCS conference champions. Boise State would be guaranteed one of the remaining 4 spots, and the OSU/Michigan loser would likely be guaranteed a spot by being in the top 4 of the BCS rankings.

Since the Rose Bowl would lose both the Big 10 and Pac 10 champions, they would get first pick of 2 teams and would almost certainly pick OSU/Michigan loser and Cal.

Not that strong. I think a more likely possibility is:

Rose: OSU/Michigan loser vs. Cal/USC winnar
Holiday Bowl: Cal/USC loser vs. Texas A&M?
Championship: OSU/Michigan winnar vs. Louisville? Rutgers is unlikely

Anyways, if I had to put money down, it would be OSU vs. Louisville for the championship.

I'd coin flip for the Rose Bowl. Even if USC has a good chance of winning against Cal, it needs to beat Oregon, ND and fUCLA, and if it slips once more against either team, it's over.

Edit: for those who think Michigan will win (small chance), then we could see Wisconsin going into the rose bowl?

yeh USC definetely has the tougher part of its schedule left
who would be #2 if auburn, texas and florida lost